You are here: Home » Law School Admissions » Dean Interviews »

Johann Lee on Northwestern Law Admissions: Work Experience, Interviews, and Application Strategy

Last Updated: September 2026

 

Top-Law-Schools.com originally interviewed Johann Lee, then Assistant Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid at Northwestern University School of Law, in August 2009. Although specific admissions procedures have changed since that conversation, many of the principles Lee discussed remain highly relevant to applicants deciding how to present their experience, career goals, writing ability, and overall readiness for law school.

Northwestern University School of Law is now known as Northwestern Pritzker School of Law. The school continues to place unusual emphasis on professional experience, maturity, communication skills, leadership, and clearly defined career goals when reviewing applicants. Its current admissions policy identifies work experience, career progression, interpersonal skills, maturity, motivation, leadership, and clarity of goals among the factors it may consider.

Editor's Note: This article reorganizes the enduring admissions lessons from Johann Lee's original interview and supplements them with current context. Historical statements concerning deadlines, tuition, scholarships, interview formats, and discontinued programs should not be treated as current Northwestern admissions policy. Applicants should always verify current requirements directly with Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.

 

Why Work Experience Matters in Northwestern Law Admissions

 

One of the most distinctive themes in Johann Lee's admissions philosophy was the value of meaningful experience before law school.

Lee's central point was not that applicants needed a prestigious corporate title or a particular type of employer. What mattered was what applicants had actually learned and accomplished. Experiences that developed responsibility, leadership, project management, advocacy, teamwork, maturity, and professional judgment could provide evidence that an applicant was ready to contribute to a demanding law school environment.

That philosophy continues to be visible in Northwestern's admissions approach. Northwestern continues to describe work experience as an important factor in admissions, and recent entering-class profiles show that a substantial majority of students arrive with post-undergraduate experience.

For prospective students, the practical lesson is straightforward: the name of an employer is only part of the story. An admissions committee may be more interested in what you were trusted to do, how you handled responsibility, what problems you solved, how you worked with others, and how your experience shaped your goals.

Applicants who want a broader understanding of the application process can review the Top-Law-Schools Law School Admissions Guide and LawCrossing's How Law Schools Determine Who to Admit.

 

Can You Apply to Law School Straight From College?

 

Applicants do not need years of full-time employment to build a credible law school application.

For students applying directly from college, however, the application has to answer questions that professional experience might otherwise help answer.

    • Does the applicant understand why they want a legal education?

 

    • Have they demonstrated maturity?

 

    • Can they collaborate with people in professional or academic settings?

 

    • Have they assumed meaningful responsibility?

 

    • Do they have a reasonably thoughtful career direction?



Internships, research, campus leadership, volunteer work, entrepreneurial projects, substantial employment during college, public service, and other experiences may help establish those qualities.

The most important distinction is between merely participating in activities and being able to explain what those experiences demonstrate.

An applicant who completed several internships but cannot explain what was learned may have a less compelling story than an applicant who held one long-term position, accepted increasing responsibility, solved meaningful problems, and can explain how the experience influenced the decision to attend law school.

 

Explain Why Law School Fits Your Career Direction

 

One of the most enduring lessons from Lee's interview is the importance of having a reason for attending law school beyond simply postponing a career decision.

A law school application should communicate intention.

That does not mean applicants must know exactly what practice area they will enter after graduation. Many law students change their interests after being exposed to new subjects. What matters is demonstrating that the decision to pursue a JD has been considered carefully.

Applicants should be prepared to explain questions such as:

    • Why law school?

 

    • Why now?

 

    • What experiences influenced the decision?

 

    • What do you hope a legal education will allow you to do that you cannot do presently?



These answers can emerge through the personal statement, application essays, résumé, interview, or a combination of materials. The goal is not to manufacture certainty. It is to demonstrate thoughtful motivation.

 

What Makes Law School Work Experience Valuable?

 

The strongest professional experience is not necessarily the experience with the most impressive job title.

Admissions committees can look beyond titles and ask what an applicant actually did.

Consider whether your experience demonstrates:

    • Increasing responsibility

 

    • Leadership

 

    • Analytical ability

 

    • Communication skills

 

    • Teamwork

 

    • Project management

 

    • Initiative

 

    • Client interaction

 

    • Advocacy

 

    • Judgment

 

    • Persistence

 

    • The ability to function effectively in a professional environment



Applicants should therefore write résumé descriptions that emphasize contributions and responsibilities rather than merely identifying employers and positions.

Someone who managed a complex project, trained other employees, communicated with clients, coordinated a team, solved an operational problem, or assumed responsibility beyond the formal job description may have an especially useful experience to discuss.

The same principle can apply to nonprofit work, military service, public service, teaching, entrepreneurship, research, international work, community organizations, or less traditional time between college and law school.

 

The Law School Admissions Interview

 

Johann Lee viewed the admissions interview as an opportunity for the school to understand qualities that are difficult to capture through grades and standardized test scores alone.

Those qualities can include interpersonal ability, communication, maturity, professional judgment, career motivation, leadership, and the ability to explain past experiences clearly.

The interview can also reveal whether the applicant has researched the school and can articulate why its academic environment and opportunities fit the applicant's goals.

Northwestern's interview format has changed substantially since Lee's 2009 interview. Northwestern Pritzker School of Law now uses an online video interview process. Applicants should consult the school's current admissions instructions for requirements and procedures applicable to their admission cycle.

The underlying preparation strategy nevertheless remains useful: know your résumé, understand your reasons for attending law school, research the institution, and be prepared to discuss experiences that demonstrate how you think and work.

For additional preparation guidance, see LawCrossing's Law School Interviews and How to Deal With Them.

 

Early Decision and Demonstrating Genuine Interest

 

Early Decision can demonstrate unusually strong interest because it generally involves a binding commitment to attend if admitted.

However, applicants should not view Early Decision simply as an admissions tactic. A binding application should follow serious research into the school, its cost, programs, employment outcomes, location, culture, and whether it fits the applicant's long-term goals.

The broader lesson from Lee's discussion remains valuable regardless of whether an applicant chooses Early Decision: admissions committees want evidence that applicants understand the institution to which they are applying.

Generic statements about reputation, rankings, or prestige rarely demonstrate much research. Applicants can make a stronger case by connecting specific aspects of the school to their academic interests, professional objectives, preferred learning environment, or career plans.

 

LSAT Scores, Retakes, and Putting Forward Your Strongest Application

 

Applicants often face a difficult timing decision: submit an application immediately or delay it to retake the LSAT, improve an essay, secure a better recommendation, or strengthen another important component.

Lee's broader principle was that applicants should prioritize submitting their strongest application.

Applying earlier can have advantages at schools operating with rolling admissions, but speed should not become more important than quality. An avoidable weakness in a personal statement, poorly prepared application, or test score an applicant reasonably believes can be improved may matter more than submitting several weeks earlier.

Because policies concerning multiple LSAT scores differ by institution and can change, applicants should verify each target school's current rules.

Applicants considering another test attempt can also review TLS's Guide to Retaking the LSAT and the broader TLS LSAT Preparation Resources.

 

Do Writing Skills Matter in Admissions?

 

Legal education and legal practice depend heavily on writing, so applicants should treat every written component seriously.

The personal statement is not merely an opportunity to supply additional biographical information. It gives admissions readers evidence of an applicant's ability to organize ideas, communicate clearly, exercise judgment, and reflect on experience.

Proofreading also matters. Grammar errors, awkward sentences, vague claims, excessive jargon, and careless formatting may undermine an otherwise strong application.

Applicants should approach every written submission—from the personal statement to optional essays and addenda—as part of a single professional presentation.

 

When Should You Write a Law School Addendum?

 

An addendum is useful when the admissions committee needs context to understand something unusual or potentially confusing in an application.

Examples may include:

    • A meaningful change in academic performance

 

    • An interruption in education

 

    • An unusual testing history

 

    • Significant circumstances affecting a particular period of an applicant's record



An addendum should provide context, not turn every minor imperfection into a crisis.

If an applicant's GPA moved only slightly during one semester, for example, drawing significant attention to the change may accomplish little. Similarly, applicants should avoid using an addendum simply to argue that an unfavorable result should not count.

Effective addenda tend to be concise, factual, proportional to the issue, and focused on information necessary for evaluating the application.

 

Writing a Strong Law School Personal Statement

 

Johann Lee identified introspection and individuality as characteristics of memorable personal statements.

That remains useful advice.

A compelling personal statement should help an admissions committee understand something meaningful about the applicant that cannot be learned simply by reviewing the résumé, transcript, and test scores.

Rather than trying to sound like what an applicant imagines a future lawyer should sound like, strong essays usually benefit from specificity, reflection, and a recognizable personal voice.

An experience itself does not have to be extraordinary. What matters is what the applicant understood, learned, changed, accomplished, or decided because of it.

TLS provides an extensive Law School Personal Statements Resource Center covering topic selection, structure, examples, common mistakes, and revision strategies. Applicants can also review LawCrossing's guidance on Submitting Your Law School Essays.

 

Choosing the Right Letters of Recommendation

 

A famous recommender is not automatically a strong recommender.

A detailed letter from someone who has directly observed an applicant's work, intellectual ability, judgment, reliability, writing, growth, or leadership can often communicate substantially more than a generic letter from a prestigious individual who barely knows the applicant.

Applicants should therefore think about depth of knowledge.

For applicants who have spent significant time in the workforce, a professional recommender may be able to describe the person they have become after college. For current students and recent graduates, professors may provide important evidence about analytical ability, classroom performance, writing, and intellectual engagement.

Requirements vary by school, so applicants should follow each institution's current instructions.

For additional guidance, see TLS's Law School Letters of Recommendation Advice.

 

Transfer Admissions

 

Transfer admission requires law schools to evaluate a different body of evidence because applicants have already demonstrated some level of performance in legal education.

First-year law school grades can therefore become extremely important, along with the rigor of the applicant's existing program, writing ability, reasons for transferring, and evidence that the applicant can succeed in the new institution.

Transfer applicants should avoid assuming that policies concerning credits, scholarships, deadlines, class rank, writing samples, or Early Decision remain unchanged from earlier admissions cycles.

Northwestern maintains current transfer requirements in its official JD admissions materials, and applicants should consult those requirements directly before applying.

 

Financial Aid, Scholarships, and the Cost of Law School

 

The financial side of law school deserves as much attention as admission itself.

Tuition, scholarships, living expenses, borrowing, interest, employment outcomes, geographic preferences, and anticipated career paths all affect the value of a particular law school choice.

Statements concerning tuition or scholarship procedures in older admissions interviews should therefore be treated as historical information.

Applicants should compare current scholarship offers and estimated total costs rather than focusing exclusively on rankings or initial tuition figures. A scholarship at one institution may materially change the financial comparison with another school.

 

How to Choose a Law School

 

Perhaps the most universally applicable point from Johann Lee's original discussion is the importance of due diligence before enrolling.

Applicants should research schools beyond headline rankings.

Before making a final decision, applicants should consider:

    • Curriculum and academic offerings

 

    • Employment outcomes

 

    • Geographic markets where graduates work

 

    • Clinics and experiential opportunities

 

    • Faculty strengths

 

    • Journals and student organizations

 

    • Student culture

 

    • Financial aid and total debt

 

    • Career services

 

    • Employers that regularly recruit from the school



When possible, speak with current students and graduates. Attend admissions events. Visit the campus or explore available virtual resources. Ask whether the environment is one in which you would actually want to spend several demanding years.

Northwestern applicants can begin with the TLS Northwestern Law Profile, but the same principle applies to every school under consideration.

A law school decision can affect finances, geography, professional relationships, and career opportunities for years. Applicants should approach it as a significant professional investment rather than simply pursuing the highest-ranked acceptance they receive.

 

The Lasting Admissions Lessons from Johann Lee

 

Although the mechanics of law school admissions have changed since the original 2009 conversation, the central questions facing applicants remain remarkably similar.

An admissions committee is trying to understand more than whether an applicant can earn strong grades or perform well on a standardized test. It is also trying to determine what the person has done, what they have learned, why they want a legal education, how clearly they communicate, how thoughtfully they make decisions, and what they may contribute to the law school community.

A strong application therefore works as a coherent whole. Work experience supports the résumé. The résumé provides context for the personal statement. Recommendations validate qualities demonstrated elsewhere. The interview provides another view of motivation and communication. Addenda explain genuine anomalies without distracting from the broader application.

Applicants who can connect these pieces into a clear, credible story are better positioned to show an admissions committee not merely what they have achieved, but who they are becoming.

 

Related Top-Law-Schools and LawCrossing Resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Relevant Top-Law-Schools Forum Discussions

 

    • Law School Admissions Forum – Questions and discussions about applications, recommendations, admissions strategy, and related issues.

 

 

 

 

    • Financial Aid Forum – Discussions concerning scholarships, loans, tuition, and financing a legal education.

 

    • Transfers Forum – Advice and discussion for law students considering transferring between schools.



Originally based on Top-Law-Schools.com's August 2009 interview with Johann Lee. Updated and reorganized to provide evergreen law school admissions guidance and to distinguish historical comments from current Northwestern Pritzker School of Law admissions practices.

Site Search
© Top Law Schools LLC 2003-2020 all rights reserved