+1beachbum wrote:This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.chrispronger wrote:One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.
On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?
. Forum
- Kikero
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am
Re: .
- chrispronger
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:12 pm
Re: .
I'm on it. Nice study breakbeachbum wrote:This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.chrispronger wrote:One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.
On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?

- shredderrrrrr
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Re: .
Hell yeah.chrispronger wrote:I'm on it. Nice study breakbeachbum wrote:This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.chrispronger wrote:One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.
On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: .
In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.
Further narrowing it down:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&start=25
You can assume they have relatively strong knowledge of DC, maybe a local of DC and probably white.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... &start=125
Definitely a guy since he refers to his "tiny dick" and how he is going to "study" so hard. Also, definitely someone big law focused.
LOL @ people thinking they are anonymous on this site.
Further narrowing it down:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&start=25
You can assume they have relatively strong knowledge of DC, maybe a local of DC and probably white.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... &start=125
Definitely a guy since he refers to his "tiny dick" and how he is going to "study" so hard. Also, definitely someone big law focused.
LOL @ people thinking they are anonymous on this site.
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: .
I didn't either. I seem to forget everything I knew about a law school subject immediately after I take the exam.rad lulz wrote:I had no idea how to answer it.kalvano wrote:What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: .
I'm studying for Con Law II right now, and it's a good question that requires some thought, but a few pages of Chemerinsky would easily set you on the right path.rad lulz wrote:I had no idea how to answer it.kalvano wrote:What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.
- Always Credited
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Re: .
Shit just got weirdMorgan12Oak wrote:In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.
Further narrowing it down:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&start=25
You can assume they have relatively strong knowledge of DC, maybe a local of DC and probably white.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... &start=125
Definitely a guy since he refers to his "tiny dick" and how he is going to "study" so hard. Also, definitely someone big law focused.
LOL @ people thinking they are anonymous on this site.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: .
Ahh if it's a conlaw II type question, then I have no idea. I only took I. Basically no individual rights.kalvano wrote:I'm studying for Con Law II right now, and it's a good question that requires some thought, but a few pages of Chemerinsky would easily set you on the right path.rad lulz wrote:I had no idea how to answer it.kalvano wrote:What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: .
Nah, we can narrow it down to one. Two sections were in this particular class together, and this person definitely wasn't in my section (which took the final first).Morgan12Oak wrote:In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: .
I wonder what the OP is doing right now: drawing the shades, unplugging his internet router, fashioning a mustache disguise...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Always Credited
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Re: .
Probably asking people on another forum how to defend against charges of academic dishonesty in law schoolstillwater wrote:I wonder what the OP is doing right now: drawing the shades, unplugging his internet router, fashioning a mustache disguise...
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: .
A self-proclaimed tiny one in factPitchO20 wrote:OP seems like a dick.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: .
I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves
- Lawl Shcool
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: .
Where'd you get racist?Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Re: .
See http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&start=25
He got banned for a relatively racist comment for a week from TLS talking about the poor minorities apparently
He got banned for a relatively racist comment for a week from TLS talking about the poor minorities apparently
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- shredderrrrrr
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Re: .
I feel slightly sadistic for finding so much pleasure in OP's potential punishment...
ETA: After quoting the below comment, fuck it. I'll gladly watch that asshole get called out.
ETA: After quoting the below comment, fuck it. I'll gladly watch that asshole get called out.
Last edited by shredderrrrrr on Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- shredderrrrrr
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Re: .
Lawl Shcool wrote:Where'd you get racist?Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves
honestapplicant wrote:Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood
- Lawl Shcool
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: .
Ahhh now I see. Carry on.shredderrrrrr wrote:Lawl Shcool wrote:Where'd you get racist?Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselveshonestapplicant wrote:Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood
- Always Credited
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Re: .
shredderrrrrr wrote:Lawl Shcool wrote:Where'd you get racist?Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselveshonestapplicant wrote:Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login