BuckinghamB wrote:It just seems like political dispositions very obviously color some people's opinions on things, which is fine until the arguments devolve into something that really isn't very law-related. I guess that would be what I consider a gunner (though not necessarily gunning for grades). It's really not that bad at all in my class, but people definitely seem to get more riled up/confrontational in conlaw more than any other class I've had. See, e.g. the ACA case.mephistopheles wrote:honest question, but can you please describe said gunners
yeah, i never really understood when people brought up arguments (opinions, really) that weren't grounded in the law. it's laughable how little it contributes to the discussion.
)
