4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT Forum

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
acardsfan1

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm

4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by acardsfan1 » Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:31 pm

I was not planning applying until next fall, but I have changed my mind. Assuming I can get all of my materials together by Mid-December, what are t14 chances with those numbers if I apply at this point in the process? Am I significantly hurting myself at Berkeley, Penn, Michigan, Duke, VA, Cornell, and GT by applying now rather than earlier? Thanks for any help you can give!

User avatar
Dialogue

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:46 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by Dialogue » Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:36 pm

Apply this year, you'll be fine. The whole "apply early" thing is overdone on this board.

You'll be in at several T14s, with a good chance at $$$.

User avatar
JollyGreenGiant

Silver
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by JollyGreenGiant » Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:21 pm

If those are the schools you want then it should be fine.

User avatar
im_blue

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by im_blue » Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:39 am

Why aren't you applying to CCN as well? You should get into at least one, if not all 3 of them.

User avatar
Moxie

Silver
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by Moxie » Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:17 pm

im_blue wrote:Why aren't you applying to CCN as well? You should get into at least one, if not all 3 of them.
Or Stanford? Your odds aren't great, but they're good enough to apply.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


acardsfan1

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by acardsfan1 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:04 pm

With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.

User avatar
Tanicius

Gold
Posts: 2984
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by Tanicius » Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:05 pm

acardsfan1 wrote:With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.
There's no harm in applying though. You've got excellent chances at NYU and Chicago specifically.

User avatar
im_blue

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by im_blue » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:25 pm

acardsfan1 wrote:With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.
You've still got good chances at Chicago and especially NYU.

User avatar
kurla88

Bronze
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:27 am

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by kurla88 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:31 pm

Got into Chicago with your numbers and unimpressive softs. Got WLed by Columbia, NYU and Harvard. Definitely apply everywhere!

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


acardsfan1

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by acardsfan1 » Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:30 pm

I really appreciate all of the help so far. No one thinks applying somewhat late (probably a little before Christmas) is going to be a problem?

User avatar
im_blue

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by im_blue » Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:50 pm

acardsfan1 wrote:I really appreciate all of the help so far. No one thinks applying somewhat late (probably a little before Christmas) is going to be a problem?
It won't be a problem. It's not early anymore, but it's not late either. Late would be submitting after the holidays and going complete in late January or February.

johndhi

Bronze
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:25 am

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by johndhi » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:36 pm

you think working with state legislature is a WEAK soft? what the hell is a strong soft, then?

User avatar
randyn

New
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by randyn » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:38 pm

what Undergrad/major

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
The Dan

Bronze
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by The Dan » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:43 pm

LSP says "Consider" for Harvard and Yale, "Admit" for Stanford, "Strong Consider" for Columbia and NYU, and "Admit" everywhere else. Shoot for the moon.

acardsfan1

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by acardsfan1 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:42 pm

johndhi wrote:you think working with state legislature is a WEAK soft? what the hell is a strong soft, then?
I sincerely hope the admission committees feel the same way!

randyn, I went to Butler University (small, liberal arts college in Indianapolis) with a major in English literature and minor in Spanish.

UofO

New
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:17 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by UofO » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:11 pm

Apply to all T-14 - including HYS.

User avatar
BasketCaseBrief

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by BasketCaseBrief » Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:15 pm

Apply to all T14s. I think you'll be accepted to at least 9 of them (but Yale is a big bee eye teesee aiche). You're going to a fine Ivy, my friend.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


cpunch

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:37 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by cpunch » Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:18 pm

in everywhere except Y and possibly HS

User avatar
Dany

Diamond
Posts: 11559
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by Dany » Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:22 pm

Just make sure you apply before the huge rush after Dec. LSAT scores are released. You'll do fine.

User avatar
JollyGreenGiant

Silver
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by JollyGreenGiant » Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:40 pm

cpunch wrote:in everywhere except Y and possibly HS
And probably Columbia.

acardsfan1

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by acardsfan1 » Sat Nov 28, 2009 10:19 pm

Thank you everyone for all of the advice/opinions. I have everything ready and am just waiting on LORs to be returned before I apply. Is it still a better idea to fax LORs to LSAC?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
im_blue

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by im_blue » Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:14 am

acardsfan1 wrote:Thank you everyone for all of the advice/opinions. I have everything ready and am just waiting on LORs to be returned before I apply. Is it still a better idea to fax LORs to LSAC?
Yes, faxing LORs should take a day or two, while mailed LORs can take longer to process.

HITeacher2

New
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by HITeacher2 » Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:42 am

Hmm.... I got into CLS, HLS and SLS with basically the exact same stats (retook a 169 to get a 171, so if 171 is your only lsat then you're better off than me) and no work experience. I applied before the economy tanked (I'm in my second year of a TFA deferral) and applied as soon as apps became open though, but I can vouch that you're right on the edge of getting in at top-6 schools. If you had applied earlier on you may have already gotten your JR2, but that's just speculation =p Basically, do not sell yourself short!

User avatar
fidesverita

Bronze
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by fidesverita » Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:49 am

Tanicius wrote:
acardsfan1 wrote:With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.
There's no harm in applying though. You've got excellent chances at NYU and Chicago specifically.
Just curious, why do you say NYU and Chicago? Are they particularly numbers driven?

User avatar
fidesverita

Bronze
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm

Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT

Post by fidesverita » Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:50 am

im_blue wrote:
acardsfan1 wrote:Thank you everyone for all of the advice/opinions. I have everything ready and am just waiting on LORs to be returned before I apply. Is it still a better idea to fax LORs to LSAC?
Yes, faxing LORs should take a day or two, while mailed LORs can take longer to process.
I talked to the LSAC people, and they said while faxing cuts down on mailing time, they still have heaps of faxes to go through and processing time may ultimately be the same.

So up to your discretion.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “What are my chances?”