4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT Forum
-
acardsfan1

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm
4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
I was not planning applying until next fall, but I have changed my mind. Assuming I can get all of my materials together by Mid-December, what are t14 chances with those numbers if I apply at this point in the process? Am I significantly hurting myself at Berkeley, Penn, Michigan, Duke, VA, Cornell, and GT by applying now rather than earlier? Thanks for any help you can give!
- Dialogue

- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:46 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Apply this year, you'll be fine. The whole "apply early" thing is overdone on this board.
You'll be in at several T14s, with a good chance at $$$.
You'll be in at several T14s, with a good chance at $$$.
- JollyGreenGiant

- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
If those are the schools you want then it should be fine.
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Why aren't you applying to CCN as well? You should get into at least one, if not all 3 of them.
- Moxie

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Or Stanford? Your odds aren't great, but they're good enough to apply.im_blue wrote:Why aren't you applying to CCN as well? You should get into at least one, if not all 3 of them.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
acardsfan1

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.
- Tanicius

- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
There's no harm in applying though. You've got excellent chances at NYU and Chicago specifically.acardsfan1 wrote:With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
You've still got good chances at Chicago and especially NYU.acardsfan1 wrote:With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.
- kurla88

- Posts: 367
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:27 am
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Got into Chicago with your numbers and unimpressive softs. Got WLed by Columbia, NYU and Harvard. Definitely apply everywhere!
-
acardsfan1

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
I really appreciate all of the help so far. No one thinks applying somewhat late (probably a little before Christmas) is going to be a problem?
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
It won't be a problem. It's not early anymore, but it's not late either. Late would be submitting after the holidays and going complete in late January or February.acardsfan1 wrote:I really appreciate all of the help so far. No one thinks applying somewhat late (probably a little before Christmas) is going to be a problem?
-
johndhi

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:25 am
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
you think working with state legislature is a WEAK soft? what the hell is a strong soft, then?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- The Dan

- Posts: 107
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:48 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
LSP says "Consider" for Harvard and Yale, "Admit" for Stanford, "Strong Consider" for Columbia and NYU, and "Admit" everywhere else. Shoot for the moon.
-
acardsfan1

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
I sincerely hope the admission committees feel the same way!johndhi wrote:you think working with state legislature is a WEAK soft? what the hell is a strong soft, then?
randyn, I went to Butler University (small, liberal arts college in Indianapolis) with a major in English literature and minor in Spanish.
-
UofO

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:17 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Apply to all T-14 - including HYS.
- BasketCaseBrief

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:52 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Apply to all T14s. I think you'll be accepted to at least 9 of them (but Yale is a big bee eye teesee aiche). You're going to a fine Ivy, my friend.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
cpunch

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:37 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
in everywhere except Y and possibly HS
- Dany

- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Just make sure you apply before the huge rush after Dec. LSAT scores are released. You'll do fine.
- JollyGreenGiant

- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
And probably Columbia.cpunch wrote:in everywhere except Y and possibly HS
-
acardsfan1

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:27 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Thank you everyone for all of the advice/opinions. I have everything ready and am just waiting on LORs to be returned before I apply. Is it still a better idea to fax LORs to LSAC?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Yes, faxing LORs should take a day or two, while mailed LORs can take longer to process.acardsfan1 wrote:Thank you everyone for all of the advice/opinions. I have everything ready and am just waiting on LORs to be returned before I apply. Is it still a better idea to fax LORs to LSAC?
-
HITeacher2

- Posts: 78
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Hmm.... I got into CLS, HLS and SLS with basically the exact same stats (retook a 169 to get a 171, so if 171 is your only lsat then you're better off than me) and no work experience. I applied before the economy tanked (I'm in my second year of a TFA deferral) and applied as soon as apps became open though, but I can vouch that you're right on the edge of getting in at top-6 schools. If you had applied earlier on you may have already gotten your JR2, but that's just speculation =p Basically, do not sell yourself short!
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
Just curious, why do you say NYU and Chicago? Are they particularly numbers driven?Tanicius wrote:There's no harm in applying though. You've got excellent chances at NYU and Chicago specifically.acardsfan1 wrote:With regards to CCN or Stanford, I worry a bit about my softs. They are decent, but won't blow anyone away. Also, I graduated this past May, and so I haven't left a lot of time for extraordinarily meaningful work experience. I am currently working as a Legislative Assistant in the state legislature and will have a full year there by time I enroll, but that seems pretty weak for Northwestern, especially.
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: 4.0 UGPA, 171 LSAT
I talked to the LSAC people, and they said while faxing cuts down on mailing time, they still have heaps of faxes to go through and processing time may ultimately be the same.im_blue wrote:Yes, faxing LORs should take a day or two, while mailed LORs can take longer to process.acardsfan1 wrote:Thank you everyone for all of the advice/opinions. I have everything ready and am just waiting on LORs to be returned before I apply. Is it still a better idea to fax LORs to LSAC?
So up to your discretion.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login