3.7 170 Forum
-
- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:34 pm
Re: 3.7 170
Just get your actual score. There’s a ton of difference between 168, 169, 170, 171, and 172.
-
- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:52 am
Re: 3.7 170
This! Plus, don't be hesitant to retake if you end up with, say, a 168 or even a 169. World of difference in admissions and merit aid outcomes between a 169 vs. a 171.The Lsat Airbender wrote:Just get your actual score. There’s a ton of difference between 168, 169, 170, 171, and 172.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:46 pm
Re: 3.7 170
Didn't mean it to sound like I was just content and gonna stop if I get a 170. Realistically, anything under a 177, I would retake. Just wanted to have an idea as a hypothetical assuming I get like a 170 as a "safety", so to speak.
-
- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:52 am
Re: 3.7 170
Possibly I am misreading the tone of your post, but if you're serious, I hafta say: There's no reasonable need to retake "anything under a 177." There's very little to no advantage to further score improvements at any school once you hit 175, and I don't even know that I'd ever advise someone in the 171-174 range to retake, unless they had a consistent PT record of 175+s and their GPA is high enough that the extra points might make a marginal difference.lawguy999 wrote:Didn't mean it to sound like I was just content and gonna stop if I get a 170. Realistically, anything under a 177, I would retake. Just wanted to have an idea as a hypothetical assuming I get like a 170 as a "safety", so to speak.
In fact, the only good reason I can think of for retaking a 176 would be for someone who wants to tutor the LSAT and wants to be able to claim they were able to score 180.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login