(It's pretty clear that I should re-take and aim for a 170(+) to be a strong candidate in general and for Columbia Law--opens many more doors, $$, etc. However, I'm hesitant to take the September test because of the new digital format... TBD

lsatstrides12 wrote:I graduated in 2016 with a 3.70 GPA and have three years of engaging legal experience. Strong softs, I think! I scored a 159 on my first LSAT in March 2019 (below practice performance) and raised it to a 167 for the June test. I hope to attend a T14 school and plan to ED to Columbia. What do you think my chances are with my current numbers?
(It's pretty clear that I should re-take and aim for a 170(+) to be a strong candidate in general and for Columbia Law--opens many more doors, $$, etc. However, I'm hesitant to take the September test because of the new digital format... TBD)
There's no real downside in retaking as schools really just look at the highest score. You're unlikely to get into Columbia with those numbers, even by EDing. As is, you're about 50-50 of snagging a t-14 altogether.lsatstrides12 wrote:I graduated in 2016 with a 3.70 GPA and have three years of engaging legal experience. Strong softs, I think! I scored a 159 on my first LSAT in March 2019 (below practice performance) and raised it to a 167 for the June test. I hope to attend a T14 school and plan to ED to Columbia. What do you think my chances are with my current numbers?
(It's pretty clear that I should re-take and aim for a 170(+) to be a strong candidate in general and for Columbia Law--opens many more doors, $$, etc. However, I'm hesitant to take the September test because of the new digital format... TBD)
You have a very strong resume and a 167 is a good score, but Columbia is not an easy school to get into and 167 will definitely be on the low side for them. As another poster said, if you really really want to be in the T14 you can probably get into lower schools with some hefty debt attached. Likely a good shot at GT, Michigan, Cornell, Northwestern, and potentially Penn. The 3 years of legal experience can end up potentially beating out other candidates who are in the 165-169 range, so there's still definitely a shot at NYU/Columbia. But the difference between 167 and 169-70 can be surprisingly important to the top schools.lsatstrides12 wrote:I graduated in 2016 with a 3.70 GPA and have three years of engaging legal experience. Strong softs, I think! I scored a 159 on my first LSAT in March 2019 (below practice performance) and raised it to a 167 for the June test. I hope to attend a T14 school and plan to ED to Columbia. What do you think my chances are with my current numbers?
(It's pretty clear that I should re-take and aim for a 170(+) to be a strong candidate in general and for Columbia Law--opens many more doors, $$, etc. However, I'm hesitant to take the September test because of the new digital format... TBD)
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login