3.4/164 Forum
-
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: 3.4/164
Why are these the schools you are considering with a 164 if I may ask
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 3.4/164
Check out http://www.mylsn.com for chances
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
The 164 is from a practice exam, I haven't actually taken the LSAT yet, the 3.4 is also just where I'm sitting at right now. Just trying to get an idea of if I were to finish with the same GPA and get the same LSAT score as the practice exam where could I expect to go, because reading "average LSAT scores/GPAs" vary online and have limited reliability.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: 3.4/164
oh, then this is irrelevant. The real LSAT is what matters, and in reality nothing can replicate the anxiety and stress of test day. But, with a 164, you should be looking at better schools.mattf wrote:The 164 is from a practice exam, I haven't actually taken the LSAT yet, the 3.4 is also just where I'm sitting at right now. Just trying to get an idea of if I were to finish with the same GPA and get the same LSAT score as the practice exam where could I expect to go, because reading "average LSAT scores/GPAs" vary online and have limited reliability.
- R. Jeeves
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: 3.4/164
Have you taken your LSAT yet? From your post history it looks like you're in the early stages of your undergraduate career as a chemistry major. You'll be better off trying pursuing employment as a chemist instead of a lawyer if you are shooting for any of the schools you've listed. Shoot for a higher LSAT score, set your sights on a T-14.
ETA: Just saw your post above. Shoot for a 170+ on your LSAT. Get your GPA up if you can too.
ETA: Just saw your post above. Shoot for a 170+ on your LSAT. Get your GPA up if you can too.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
I started out majoring in chemistry, I did some undergrad research in a lab for a while and despised it. My interpersonal skills are too strong for a job doing any kind of chemical research or work really, it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social. Judging from the lab I did undergrad research in and the type of people in the chemistry classes I'm taking I'm guessing that would be the majority of the type of people I would work with. In addition to that a career in law has appealed to me for quite a while.pulstar1 wrote:Have you taken your LSAT yet? From your post history it looks like you're in the early stages of your undergraduate career as a chemistry major. You'll be better off trying pursuing employment as a chemist instead of a lawyer if you are shooting for any of the schools you've listed. Shoot for a higher LSAT score, set your sights on a T-14.
ETA: Just saw your post above. Shoot for a 170+ on your LSAT. Get your GPA up if you can too.
Last edited by mattf on Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: 3.4/164
Run, run as fast as your little legs can take you in the exact opposite direction as law school.mattf wrote:it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
Maybe law school students and lawyers are sometimes, or commonly anti-social but that doesn't mean that all of them are or that the clients would be.twenty wrote:Run, run as fast as your little legs can take you in the exact opposite direction as law school.mattf wrote:it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social
Also, I sincerely doubt that they come close to matching the level of "anti-socialness" as a large amount of the people majoring in something science-related.
- R. Jeeves
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: 3.4/164
Is it too late to switch your major? I'm in engineering and I have the same complaints, but by the time I decided that law school would be my escape route I was already in too deep.mattf wrote:I started out majoring in chemistry, I did some undergrad research in a lab for a while and despised it. My interpersonal skills are too strong for a job doing any kind of chemical research or work really, it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social. Judging from the lab I did undergrad research in and the type of people in the chemistry classes I'm taking I'm guessing that would be the majority of the type of people I would work with. In addition to that a career in law has appealed to me for quite a while.pulstar1 wrote:Have you taken your LSAT yet? From your post history it looks like you're in the early stages of your undergraduate career as a chemistry major. You'll be better off trying pursuing employment as a chemist instead of a lawyer if you are shooting for any of the schools you've listed. Shoot for a higher LSAT score, set your sights on a T-14.
ETA: Just saw your post above. Shoot for a 170+ on your LSAT. Get your GPA up if you can too.
What exactly is a T-14 school and what are the average LSAT/GPA for those schools? What's the benefit of going to one of those skills as opposed to the schools I listed above or any other school for that matter?
T-14 refers to the law schools ranked numbers 1 through 14 by USNWR. Graduating from one of these schools is more likely to get you a job that can service your debt than most other schools can.
But how do you know that a career in law is what you want? Do you know any thing about the profession? Do you know what the salaries and job prospects are like? You aren't familiar with the concept of T-14, so it looks like you have quite a bit of research left to do before it would be wise to plan on going to law school for sure.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 3.4/164
I saw what you edited out. T14 is the top schools as ranked by US News, basically the best law schools in the country and most people consider them a cut above the rest. The rest of the U.S. News rankings really don't matter for the most part.mattf wrote:I started out majoring in chemistry, I did some undergrad research in a lab for a while and despised it. My interpersonal skills are too strong for a job doing any kind of chemical research or work really, it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social. Judging from the lab I did undergrad research in and the type of people in the chemistry classes I'm taking I'm guessing that would be the majority of the type of people I would work with. In addition to that a career in law has appealed to me for quite a while.pulstar1 wrote:Have you taken your LSAT yet? From your post history it looks like you're in the early stages of your undergraduate career as a chemistry major. You'll be better off trying pursuing employment as a chemist instead of a lawyer if you are shooting for any of the schools you've listed. Shoot for a higher LSAT score, set your sights on a T-14.
ETA: Just saw your post above. Shoot for a 170+ on your LSAT. Get your GPA up if you can too.
Check out the website law school transparency for an idea of how well schools place their grads, where they place them, etc. to come up with a list to apply to.
- Mullens
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
Re: 3.4/164
1. Law is a pretty anti-social profession. If you hate working with anti-social people, being a lawyer probably isn't for you.mattf wrote:I started out majoring in chemistry, I did some undergrad research in a lab for a while and despised it. My interpersonal skills are too strong for a job doing any kind of chemical research or work really, it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social. Judging from the lab I did undergrad research in and the type of people in the chemistry classes I'm taking I'm guessing that would be the majority of the type of people I would work with. In addition to that a career in law has appealed to me for quite a while.pulstar1 wrote:Have you taken your LSAT yet? From your post history it looks like you're in the early stages of your undergraduate career as a chemistry major. You'll be better off trying pursuing employment as a chemist instead of a lawyer if you are shooting for any of the schools you've listed. Shoot for a higher LSAT score, set your sights on a T-14.
ETA: Just saw your post above. Shoot for a 170+ on your LSAT. Get your GPA up if you can too.
What exactly is a T-14 school and what are the average LSAT/GPA for those schools? What's the benefit of going to one of those skills as opposed to the schools I listed above or any other school for that matter?
2. Here's a google doc of the LSAT/GPA medians.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- R. Jeeves
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: 3.4/164
There are other ways out of STEM though. You don't have to be a lawyer to escape.mattf wrote:Maybe law school students and lawyers are sometimes, or commonly anti-social but that doesn't mean that all of them are or that the clients would be.twenty wrote:Run, run as fast as your little legs can take you in the exact opposite direction as law school.mattf wrote:it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social
Also, I sincerely doubt that they come close to matching the level of "anti-socialness" as a large amount of the people majoring in something science-related.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
I don't know much about law school, admissions, application process, etc. But I've done a decent amount of research on what the day-to-day job is like, what the outlook for jobs is like, how much lawyers of different fields enjoy their job, the different types of law you can go into, etc.pulstar1 wrote:Is it too late to switch your major? I'm in engineering and I have the same complaints, but by the time I decided that law school would be my escape route I was already in too deep.mattf wrote:I started out majoring in chemistry, I did some undergrad research in a lab for a while and despised it. My interpersonal skills are too strong for a job doing any kind of chemical research or work really, it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social. Judging from the lab I did undergrad research in and the type of people in the chemistry classes I'm taking I'm guessing that would be the majority of the type of people I would work with. In addition to that a career in law has appealed to me for quite a while.pulstar1 wrote:Have you taken your LSAT yet? From your post history it looks like you're in the early stages of your undergraduate career as a chemistry major. You'll be better off trying pursuing employment as a chemist instead of a lawyer if you are shooting for any of the schools you've listed. Shoot for a higher LSAT score, set your sights on a T-14.
ETA: Just saw your post above. Shoot for a 170+ on your LSAT. Get your GPA up if you can too.
What exactly is a T-14 school and what are the average LSAT/GPA for those schools? What's the benefit of going to one of those skills as opposed to the schools I listed above or any other school for that matter?
T-14 refers to the law schools ranked numbers 1 through 14 by USNWR. Graduating from one of these schools is more likely to get you a job that can service your debt than most other schools can.
But how do you know that a career in law is what you want? Do you know any thing about the profession? Do you know what the salaries and job prospects are like? You aren't familiar with the concept of T-14, so it looks like you have quite a bit of research left to do before it would be wise to plan on going to law school for sure.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: 3.4/164
1) Take "those people majoring in something science related" and put them in a group of between 80 and 350 other equally smart people.mattf wrote:Also, I sincerely doubt that they come close to matching the level of "anti-socialness" as a large amount of the people majoring in something science-related.
2) Zap their credit cards in the amount of anywhere from 100k to 320k.
3) Tell them that the only way to make that money back is to "be smarter" on a 4 hour test than the other smart people in the group.
It's not just really awkward and anti-social, it's also needlessly over-competitive. Other law students are unquestioningly the worst part of law school.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
And I did a fair amount of research on other jobs I could have with a Chemistry degree that would better suit my interests and different ways I could switch my major but I don't see being a lawyer as a "way to escape". I see it as a job I would enjoy doing and an alternative to what I was planning on doing before but later realized I would not enjoy.pulstar1 wrote:There are other ways out of STEM though. You don't have to be a lawyer to escape.mattf wrote:Maybe law school students and lawyers are sometimes, or commonly anti-social but that doesn't mean that all of them are or that the clients would be.twenty wrote:Run, run as fast as your little legs can take you in the exact opposite direction as law school.mattf wrote:it would drive me insane to work around people who were anti-social
Also, I sincerely doubt that they come close to matching the level of "anti-socialness" as a large amount of the people majoring in something science-related.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
But why is it so anti-social. Who specifically involved with the job of being a lawyer is anti-social? Or is it just other lawyers/law students.twenty wrote:1) Take "those people majoring in something science related" and put them in a group of between 80 and 350 other equally smart people.mattf wrote:Also, I sincerely doubt that they come close to matching the level of "anti-socialness" as a large amount of the people majoring in something science-related.
2) Zap their credit cards in the amount of anywhere from 100k to 320k.
3) Tell them that the only way to make that money back is to "be smarter" on a 4 hour test than the other smart people in the group.
It's not just really awkward and anti-social, it's also needlessly over-competitive. Other law students are unquestioningly the worst part of law school.
- Mullens
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
- R. Jeeves
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: 3.4/164
Fair points, but have you actually had a conversation with a chem major before? ....yeah that's because no one has. I have a difficult time believing that lawyers are weirder than STEMers. Anecdote: Seoulless is a chem major.twenty wrote:1) Take "those people majoring in something science related" and put them in a group of between 80 and 350 other equally smart people.mattf wrote:Also, I sincerely doubt that they come close to matching the level of "anti-socialness" as a large amount of the people majoring in something science-related.
2) Zap their credit cards in the amount of anywhere from 100k to 320k.
3) Tell them that the only way to make that money back is to "be smarter" on a 4 hour test than the other smart people in the group.
It's not just really awkward and anti-social, it's also needlessly over-competitive. Other law students are unquestioningly the worst part of law school.
ETA: although, yes, an environment that is academically competitive to this degree is almost certainly not going to foster the social environment that youre imagining OP.
Last edited by R. Jeeves on Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: 3.4/164
I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. Who else would be in the scope of "people" if not lawyers/law students? If you want to go for the apples to apples comparison here, we're comparing people in law to people in hard sciences. They're pretty much the same, with the former being more competitive (probably) due to more debt and less job security. If you're including clients, judges, professors, etc., then the comparison is less fair.
edit> I'm sure chem majors are horrible people too.
edit2> I guess all this to say: don't go for law because you think chem/etc. is ridiculously anti-social.
edit> I'm sure chem majors are horrible people too.
edit2> I guess all this to say: don't go for law because you think chem/etc. is ridiculously anti-social.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
Why do you feel the need to challenge me? I was curious before I even started seriously considering law school what exactly it was that a lawyer does on a day-to-day basis. So I researched it, and not just from one source but multiple. Believe it or not T14 never came up under any of the write-ups of what a lawyer does on a daily basis, and as I had previously mentioned I was more curious with what lawyers actually did and less with what is required of a prospective law student in terms of grades/LSAT score and what law school I should to go to, to achieve what I desire.Mullens wrote:What do you think the day-to-day job of a lawyer is like? Please explain it to me. I have a hard time believing you truly understand when you had never heard of the T14.mattf wrote:
I don't know much about law school, admissions, application process, etc. But I've done a decent amount of research on what the day-to-day job is like, what the outlook for jobs is like, how much lawyers of different fields enjoy their job, the different types of law you can go into, etc.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
I guess anti-social isn't the best adjective to use, socially awkward would be better. And while many lawyers may be anti-social they aren't entirely who you work with. You work people of various professions. Whereas if I were to work as a chemist I would be working almost exclusively with chemists (with the exception of my bosses who would most likely be chemists who simply climbed the ladder).twenty wrote:I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. Who else would be in the scope of "people" if not lawyers/law students? If you want to go for the apples to apples comparison here, we're comparing people in law to people in hard sciences. They're pretty much the same, with the former being more competitive (probably) due to more debt and less job security. If you're including clients, judges, professors, etc., then the comparison is less fair.
edit> I'm sure chem majors are horrible people too.
edit2> I guess all this to say: don't go for law because you think chem/etc. is ridiculously anti-social.
And I'm not going for law solely because I think chem is anti-social, I'm deciding not to pursue a career in chemistry because the majority of the people working in it are anti-social.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: 3.4/164
At some level that's probably true, but not enough to make a notable difference. There are places where that rings more true than others. At a law firm, you'll be with socially-awkward/anti-social lawyers 24/7. There's very little client interaction as a budding associate. On the other hand, if you start with the PD's office, you'll probably have lots of client interaction pretty early on. I suppose that is unique from chemistry in that regard - but if chemistry is a D-, law is a B- as far as sociability goes. It's probably an improvement depending on what you're doing, but also kind of a frying pan -> fire thing if the social awkwardness of chem people bothers you that much. Like, it will bother you in law, too, is what I'm saying.mattf wrote:I guess anti-social isn't the best adjective to use, socially awkward would be better. And while many lawyers may be anti-social they aren't entirely who you work with. You work people of various professions. Whereas if I were to work as a chemist I would be working almost exclusively with chemists (with the exception of my bosses who would most likely be chemists who simply climbed the ladder).twenty wrote:I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. Who else would be in the scope of "people" if not lawyers/law students? If you want to go for the apples to apples comparison here, we're comparing people in law to people in hard sciences. They're pretty much the same, with the former being more competitive (probably) due to more debt and less job security. If you're including clients, judges, professors, etc., then the comparison is less fair.
edit> I'm sure chem majors are horrible people too.
edit2> I guess all this to say: don't go for law because you think chem/etc. is ridiculously anti-social.
And I'm not going for law solely because I think chem is anti-social, I'm deciding not to pursue a career in chemistry because the majority of the people working in it are anti-social.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:09 pm
Re: 3.4/164
It's to a lesser degree, and I could be somewhat selective in what I do as a lawyer to maximize client interaction and minimize social awkwardness. You're going to have that type of people no matter where you guy, I understand that and I can tolerate it to a certain degree, even to a moderately-high degree. But working in a chemistry lab, it's a lot to put up with. It's almost to the point where having the simplest of colloquial conversations can prove almost cumbersome (e.g. "So how have you been doing today?" ".....Good....")twenty wrote:At some level that's probably true, but not enough to make a notable difference. There are places where that rings more true than others. At a law firm, you'll be with socially-awkward/anti-social lawyers 24/7. There's very little client interaction as a budding associate. On the other hand, if you start with the PD's office, you'll probably have lots of client interaction pretty early on. I suppose that is unique from chemistry in that regard - but if chemistry is a D-, law is a B- as far as sociability goes. It's probably an improvement depending on what you're doing, but also kind of a frying pan -> fire thing if the social awkwardness of chem people bothers you that much. Like, it will bother you in law, too, is what I'm saying.mattf wrote:I guess anti-social isn't the best adjective to use, socially awkward would be better. And while many lawyers may be anti-social they aren't entirely who you work with. You work people of various professions. Whereas if I were to work as a chemist I would be working almost exclusively with chemists (with the exception of my bosses who would most likely be chemists who simply climbed the ladder).twenty wrote:I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. Who else would be in the scope of "people" if not lawyers/law students? If you want to go for the apples to apples comparison here, we're comparing people in law to people in hard sciences. They're pretty much the same, with the former being more competitive (probably) due to more debt and less job security. If you're including clients, judges, professors, etc., then the comparison is less fair.
edit> I'm sure chem majors are horrible people too.
edit2> I guess all this to say: don't go for law because you think chem/etc. is ridiculously anti-social.
And I'm not going for law solely because I think chem is anti-social, I'm deciding not to pursue a career in chemistry because the majority of the people working in it are anti-social.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login