Northwestern law splitter question Forum

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
Post Reply
User avatar
Harry_Pluxen

Bronze
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:36 pm

Northwestern law splitter question

Post by Harry_Pluxen » Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:15 am

resolved
Last edited by Harry_Pluxen on Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jk148706

Gold
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by jk148706 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:47 pm

.
Last edited by jk148706 on Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Harry_Pluxen

Bronze
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:36 pm

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by Harry_Pluxen » Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:25 pm

jk148706 wrote:Barely higher gpa and 171 here.

Accepted at NU last cycle

Had some work experience though, but honestly don't think that was the difference maker really
Do you mind if I ask what kind of work experience you had? Was it post-undergrad?

Thanks.

jk148706

Gold
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by jk148706 » Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:38 pm

.
Last edited by jk148706 on Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Chrstgtr

Bronze
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:53 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by Chrstgtr » Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:47 pm

jk148706 wrote:
Harry_Pluxen wrote:
jk148706 wrote:Barely higher gpa and 171 here.

Accepted at NU last cycle

Had some work experience though, but honestly don't think that was the difference maker really
Do you mind if I ask what kind of work experience you had? Was it post-undergrad?

Thanks.
three years of post undergrad work.. but non-impressive, nothing notable.

I don't think that made much of a difference.. plenty of k-jds with my numbers got in as well
I think NU's work requirement is more of a "I did something" than "I did something awesome"

It is def worth applying if you have any sort of WE.

K-JDs exist, just not in large numbers. Either way anyone looking for a T14 for apply.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


jk148706

Gold
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by jk148706 » Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:40 am

While I think NU places SOME value on WE, I just don't think it factors in as much as most ppl on TLS do.

They're interested in numbers just like everyone else.

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by Tiago Splitter » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:04 am

jk148706 wrote:While I think NU places SOME value on WE, I just don't think it factors in as much as most ppl on TLS do.

They're interested in numbers just like everyone else.
The emphasis on WE has declined quite a bit with the drop in apps. A few years ago WE was effectively mandatory.

User avatar
whitespider

Silver
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:37 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by whitespider » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:13 am

Harry_Pluxen wrote:expecting low-mid 170s on lsat next month
I really wouldn't be stressing out about your chances until you have an actual LSAT score. Lots of people "expect" a score in the 170s and end up with scores in the 150s or 160s.

Keep in mind only about 2.5 of every 100 LSAT takers break 170.

Right now, just focus on acheiving the highest LSAT possible. Don't stress about your options quite yet.

jk148706

Gold
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by jk148706 » Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:10 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
jk148706 wrote:While I think NU places SOME value on WE, I just don't think it factors in as much as most ppl on TLS do.

They're interested in numbers just like everyone else.
The emphasis on WE has declined quite a bit with the drop in apps. A few years ago WE was effectively mandatory.
ah, could explain why so many people keep saying it, even though I don't really see it.

gotcha

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


kcdc1

Silver
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by kcdc1 » Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:13 pm

I think NU has been quietly reducing its work experience emphasis in order to improve/maintain its LSAT median. If you hit your LSAT target and you do well on the interview component, you will most likely be admitted.

User avatar
Attax

Gold
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by Attax » Fri Aug 29, 2014 6:05 pm

Take the LSAT first. I was a splitter with a 168 and was WL at NU (withdrew)

User avatar
Harry_Pluxen

Bronze
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:36 pm

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by Harry_Pluxen » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:03 am

Whitespider: Agreed, LSAT is still the focus in the final (home stretch) month atm.

Do you think it matters that my work experience will still be relevant even though their emphasis on WE has declined?

thanks

User avatar
whitespider

Silver
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:37 am

Re: Northwestern law splitter question

Post by whitespider » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:11 am

In an age of declining apps, numbers rules. I'd say a 17X gets you in regardless of WE.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “What are my chances?”