161/3.5 schools in so cal? Forum

[secondshot]

Hey guys, I need to know if I could expect any scholarship money at all with a 3.5, 161 LSAT at any of the following schools: LMU, Pepperdine, USD, or Southwestern?

I need at least 75% of my tuition covered. I can cover the rest without a loan. I really need to avoid loans. Thanks for your help.

[whitespider]

75% or more?

Your best bets are SD and Southwestern. Though, both really only give you coin-flip odds at, you know... actually being a lawyer.

http://www.lstscorereports.com/state/CA/

[whitespider]

Though, dude, I thought I recognized your username so searched your post history...

"will be 45 when I enter LS. I have a wife and mortgage, with 2 kids."

Please don't do this to your wife and kids.

[secondshot]

Take it easy, a lot has changed over the last 6 months. We're financially secure. We're just not trying to incur anymore debt. My last career has given me a secure savings for the rest of my life and my wife is also very financially secure. My kids colleges are both paid. Yes, I will be 45 when I enter LS, but it will be a luxury, a lifetime dream without cost. I can afford maybe 25% of the tuition at any of the schools listed without affecting our life savings. That's why I asked.

Also, been offered a spot at a small firm with good friends after LS, so job prospects is not a concern.

[03152016]

then go to an unaccredited school on the cheap

edit: actually obviously you should retake until you get $$$
but since you probably won't do that, might as well take the cheapest route possible

[03152016]

and of course the wise move would be not to go at all

[whitespider]

I should never have looked at your post history, because now I've fallen down the rabbit hole...

March 2014
(http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4#p7558254)
(http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 8#p7537938)
You're a sophomore asking about softs that has never taken the LSAT

April 2014
(http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 8#p7588118)
You've been admitted to UCLA at sticker

Impressive.

[secondshot]

It's due to the inability for people to answer posted questions, and instead editorialize their answers like this thread has already deteriorated into. That's why sometimes I have to manipulate my answers to get the question I'm asking answered. Looks like nothings changed around here. Later.

[03152016]

no actually you are just a moron (as evidenced by your shitty numbers and your unwillingness to listen to reason)
good luck op, have fun playing lawyer at your friend's shitlaw firm

170 here I come!

[cron1834]

no actually you are just a moron (as evidenced by your shitty numbers and your unwillingness to listen to reason)
good luck op, have fun playing lawyer at your friend's shitlaw firm

[TheSpanishMain]

no actually you are just a moron (as evidenced by your shitty numbers and your unwillingness to listen to reason)
good luck op, have fun playing lawyer at your friend's shitlaw firm

170 here I come!

Don't worry, he'll just post another thread where he'll claim he does have a 170.

I never understand how people expect not to get caught when they post blatantly contradictory bullshit like this.