Opinions? Forum
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:36 am
Opinions?
Graduated in May, and I am working full time now. I'm considering applying this cycle, with a 170 and 3.94 from a Top 5 school; ideally I would get in to HYSC but if not, I'm considering retaking in the spring (Feb or June 2015 LSAT). Should I go ahead and apply this cycle and see what happens, or should I wait for the next cycle? I'm not going to retake in September because I wont be able to actually prepare given that I work full time and it's just the start of my full time job, but I'm hoping to be able to prepare in time for one of the 2015 tests.
My chances don't seem great with my current stats; the LSAT being a bit low for where I want to go. I'm not in a rush to get into Law School and would only go if I got into HYSC; money wouldn't be a problem, as my parents are generously going to support me.
Please don't quote.
Thanks all!
My chances don't seem great with my current stats; the LSAT being a bit low for where I want to go. I'm not in a rush to get into Law School and would only go if I got into HYSC; money wouldn't be a problem, as my parents are generously going to support me.
Please don't quote.
Thanks all!
- thequigley
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Opinions?
Faded wrote: Please don't quote.
- thequigley
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Opinions?
Why not apply? If you get in, you get in.
- CoffeeIsLife
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:25 pm
Re: Opinions?
Edit: Shitty search parameters
Last edited by CoffeeIsLife on Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:36 am
Re: Opinions?
But that has a range of 4 points, which I feel is quite large; the difference between a 172 and a 170 is significant, no?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: Opinions?
Yes, those are bad search parameters. Unless you're looking for scarce URM data, an LSAT range should never be anything close to that broad. You get more data points, but you're sweeping in a ton of irrelevant data. Also, the 2011-12 cycle was considerably more competitive than the last two and should be excluded at this point.Faded wrote:But that has a range of 4 points, which I feel is quite large; the difference between a 172 and a 170 is significant, no?

- R. Jeeves
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Opinions?
Go for it. Applying to only 4 schools wont be too much work. Your current chances are worth at least taking a stab. Also, if you reapply next year with a 172+ and some more work exp., a rejection in a previous cycle won't hurt you all that much.