168/3.91/Military/non-URM Forum
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
168/3.91/Military/non-URM
LSAT: Cancel / 165 / Bombed June 2014 LSAT
GPA: 3.91 from an Ivy League school
Currently serving in the Army as an enlisted. Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
I'll have served for two years by the time I attend law school (which will count for work experience).
So the issue is, I panic when I see logic games. Weird, I know, but I can't help it. I got one more re-take left since my first test was in June 2012; so my understanding is, I'll be able to take again in October? However, preparing for the test while working full-time has been rough, and I don't know if raising my score is very likely. I do not wish to take another year off to study for the LSAT. I'm already behind of others by 2 years, due to my service.
Another issue I have is my parents. If I had a choice, I do not want to depend on them for law school, for various reasons. Schools that offer full tuition scholarship sound nice, but I know that my numbers aren't good enough to ED Northwestern, but good enough for EDing GWU.
Lower T-14 schools are an option, but loans will be a pain because I'm not an American citizen, and I will need a co-signer and a bunch of other things that aren't very fun to deal with.
Thanks for reading, and please comment freely about what I should do. ED a school that'll give me a good money but with worse job prospects? Or, go to a higher ranked school with a better chance for BigLaw, but pay a lot more fore it? And perhaps advice with LG?
Edit: June LSAT score for Asia just came out. 168 now.
GPA: 3.91 from an Ivy League school
Currently serving in the Army as an enlisted. Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
I'll have served for two years by the time I attend law school (which will count for work experience).
So the issue is, I panic when I see logic games. Weird, I know, but I can't help it. I got one more re-take left since my first test was in June 2012; so my understanding is, I'll be able to take again in October? However, preparing for the test while working full-time has been rough, and I don't know if raising my score is very likely. I do not wish to take another year off to study for the LSAT. I'm already behind of others by 2 years, due to my service.
Another issue I have is my parents. If I had a choice, I do not want to depend on them for law school, for various reasons. Schools that offer full tuition scholarship sound nice, but I know that my numbers aren't good enough to ED Northwestern, but good enough for EDing GWU.
Lower T-14 schools are an option, but loans will be a pain because I'm not an American citizen, and I will need a co-signer and a bunch of other things that aren't very fun to deal with.
Thanks for reading, and please comment freely about what I should do. ED a school that'll give me a good money but with worse job prospects? Or, go to a higher ranked school with a better chance for BigLaw, but pay a lot more fore it? And perhaps advice with LG?
Edit: June LSAT score for Asia just came out. 168 now.
Last edited by kevin0201 on Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
You have a Yale-worthy GPA. Whether you take on $300K of debt at a T14 (ED to UVA) or give up on the T14 for a scholarship at a regional school, I think it would be tragic either way when all that's standing between you and YHS is LG.
What exactly have you done in studying for LG? How many times have you taken the LSAT? Maybe you could benefit from a few sessions with a private tutor on LG -- or something. I just have to think it's too early for you to throw in the towel.
What exactly have you done in studying for LG? How many times have you taken the LSAT? Maybe you could benefit from a few sessions with a private tutor on LG -- or something. I just have to think it's too early for you to throw in the towel.
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Thank you for your service.
Now get onto LG prep. Check out Manhattan's books, or Velocity. Don't waste that GPA when the LG are the easiest on which to improve. Improve 3+, and prosper.
Good luck.
Now get onto LG prep. Check out Manhattan's books, or Velocity. Don't waste that GPA when the LG are the easiest on which to improve. Improve 3+, and prosper.
Good luck.
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.bjsesq wrote:Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Ok. Ranger school would help in apps, PLDC not so muchkevin0201 wrote:WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.bjsesq wrote:Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
- heythatslife
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:18 pm
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Hmmm do most adcoms actually appreciate how much of a big deal Ranger School is compared to other random courses?bjsesq wrote:Ok. Ranger school would help in apps, PLDC not so muchkevin0201 wrote:WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.bjsesq wrote:Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
The title of Army Ranger helps, even if you aren't a batt boy. Mostly because people don't know the difference.heythatslife wrote:Hmmm do most adcoms actually appreciate how much of a big deal Ranger School is compared to other random courses?
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Will you be Post 911 eligible? If so, consider EDing UVA for a full ride if you serve a full three years
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Edit: 168!!! June score just came out (I'm stationed in Korea).
Now what?
Now what?
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Unfortunately, no...TheSpanishMain wrote:Will you be Post 911 eligible? If so, consider EDing UVA for a full ride if you serve a full three years
- Mullens
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Typically you'd have very little chance of getting ED NU, but vets tend to outperform their numbers. Bummer you don't have the GI Bill though.
I'd ED to NU regardless and hope for the best.
I'd ED to NU regardless and hope for the best.
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Yes, you definitely have a chance at NU via ED. Here are some folks with 168s and lower GPAs that were accepted with a full ride this cycle:kevin0201 wrote:Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MeowMix77
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jaredcal
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Wildcats17
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?
Yeah. I made the GPA range wider and found that 1 person out of 3 was accepted ED at NU.Ti Malice wrote:Yes, you definitely have a chance at NU via ED. Here are some folks with 168s and lower GPAs that were accepted with a full ride this cycle:kevin0201 wrote:Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MeowMix77
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jaredcal
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Wildcats17
Is the number small because I'm a reverse splitter?
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
I'm entertaining the idea of EDing NU and blanketing T14 and some more.
Yay or nay?
Yay or nay?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Blanket the T20. I'd be absolutely shocked if you didn't end up with at least one full ride.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Thanks!twenty wrote:Blanket the T20. I'd be absolutely shocked if you didn't end up with at least one full ride.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Here's a vet with pretty much identical #s (shade worse than yours really): http://lawschoolnumbers.com/zbollenbkevin0201 wrote:That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
Unfortunately this person only applied to 3 schools and didn't post scholly amts. Nonetheless, I think this should demonstrate that EDing GW would be an awful choice.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Yeah not EDing GWU no more. I was so sure I bombed the June LSAT.daleearnhardt123 wrote:Here's a vet with pretty much identical #s (shade worse than yours really): http://lawschoolnumbers.com/zbollenbkevin0201 wrote:That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
Unfortunately this person only applied to 3 schools and didn't post scholly amts. Nonetheless, I think this should demonstrate that EDing GW would be an awful choice.
Thanks for so much useful information! Are you a vet yourself?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Here are some other profiles of vets,
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/r-t87
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/thedave29
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/twobitrye
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/goreman
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bahama
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/matthewsean85
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/SchusterFlook
By the way, I know of vets with LSATs around 167-168 who made it into H and Y as non-URMs. You should apply to literally all of the top 14, including Y, as your military credentials will be worth much more than half a point on the LSAT.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/r-t87
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/thedave29
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/twobitrye
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/goreman
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bahama
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/matthewsean85
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/SchusterFlook
By the way, I know of vets with LSATs around 167-168 who made it into H and Y as non-URMs. You should apply to literally all of the top 14, including Y, as your military credentials will be worth much more than half a point on the LSAT.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM
Responding again just to echo this. Law schools love vets. Good work ethics and you all outperform your #s at OCI regularly, which is great for the school's employment stats. Not a vet myself, just happen to know a good #.winstonsalem wrote:Here are some other profiles of vets,
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/r-t87
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/thedave29
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/twobitrye
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/goreman
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bahama
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/matthewsean85
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/SchusterFlook
By the way, I know of vets with LSATs around 167-168 who made it into H and Y as non-URMs. You should apply to literally all of the top 14, including Y, as your military credentials will be worth much more than half a point on the LSAT.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login