168/3.91/Military/non-URM Forum

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by kevin0201 » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:13 am

LSAT: Cancel / 165 / Bombed June 2014 LSAT
GPA: 3.91 from an Ivy League school

Currently serving in the Army as an enlisted. Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
I'll have served for two years by the time I attend law school (which will count for work experience).

So the issue is, I panic when I see logic games. Weird, I know, but I can't help it. I got one more re-take left since my first test was in June 2012; so my understanding is, I'll be able to take again in October? However, preparing for the test while working full-time has been rough, and I don't know if raising my score is very likely. I do not wish to take another year off to study for the LSAT. I'm already behind of others by 2 years, due to my service.

Another issue I have is my parents. If I had a choice, I do not want to depend on them for law school, for various reasons. Schools that offer full tuition scholarship sound nice, but I know that my numbers aren't good enough to ED Northwestern, but good enough for EDing GWU.

Lower T-14 schools are an option, but loans will be a pain because I'm not an American citizen, and I will need a co-signer and a bunch of other things that aren't very fun to deal with.

Thanks for reading, and please comment freely about what I should do. ED a school that'll give me a good money but with worse job prospects? Or, go to a higher ranked school with a better chance for BigLaw, but pay a lot more fore it? And perhaps advice with LG?

Edit: June LSAT score for Asia just came out. 168 now.
Last edited by kevin0201 on Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Ti Malice

Gold
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by Ti Malice » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:31 am

You have a Yale-worthy GPA. Whether you take on $300K of debt at a T14 (ED to UVA) or give up on the T14 for a scholarship at a regional school, I think it would be tragic either way when all that's standing between you and YHS is LG.

What exactly have you done in studying for LG? How many times have you taken the LSAT? Maybe you could benefit from a few sessions with a private tutor on LG -- or something. I just have to think it's too early for you to throw in the towel.

Big Dog

Silver
Posts: 1205
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by Big Dog » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:47 am

Thank you for your service.

Now get onto LG prep. Check out Manhattan's books, or Velocity. Don't waste that GPA when the LG are the easiest on which to improve. Improve 3+, and prosper.

Good luck.

User avatar
bjsesq

Diamond
Posts: 13320
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by bjsesq » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:21 am

kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.

(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by kevin0201 » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:49 am

bjsesq wrote:
kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.

(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
bjsesq

Diamond
Posts: 13320
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by bjsesq » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:51 am

kevin0201 wrote:
bjsesq wrote:
kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.

(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.
Ok. Ranger school would help in apps, PLDC not so much

User avatar
heythatslife

Silver
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:18 pm

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by heythatslife » Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:25 am

bjsesq wrote:
kevin0201 wrote:
bjsesq wrote:
kevin0201 wrote: Nothing too intense but expected to complete a competitive leadership course in August.
Ranger school or PLDC/BNCOC? This may actually make a difference.

(Assuming not ranger because you are posting here)
WLC (Warrior Leader Course). Says WLC used to be PLDC? I start in August.
Ok. Ranger school would help in apps, PLDC not so much
Hmmm do most adcoms actually appreciate how much of a big deal Ranger School is compared to other random courses?

User avatar
bjsesq

Diamond
Posts: 13320
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by bjsesq » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:22 pm

heythatslife wrote:Hmmm do most adcoms actually appreciate how much of a big deal Ranger School is compared to other random courses?
The title of Army Ranger helps, even if you aren't a batt boy. Mostly because people don't know the difference.

User avatar
TheSpanishMain

Gold
Posts: 4744
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by TheSpanishMain » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:55 pm

Will you be Post 911 eligible? If so, consider EDing UVA for a full ride if you serve a full three years

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by kevin0201 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 6:16 pm

Edit: 168!!! June score just came out (I'm stationed in Korea).

Now what?

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 165/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by kevin0201 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 6:16 pm

TheSpanishMain wrote:Will you be Post 911 eligible? If so, consider EDing UVA for a full ride if you serve a full three years
Unfortunately, no...

User avatar
Mullens

Silver
Posts: 1138
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by Mullens » Mon Jul 14, 2014 6:25 pm

Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by kevin0201 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:18 pm

Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
twenty

Gold
Posts: 3189
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by twenty » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:43 pm

Typically you'd have very little chance of getting ED NU, but vets tend to outperform their numbers. Bummer you don't have the GI Bill though.

I'd ED to NU regardless and hope for the best.

Ti Malice

Gold
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by Ti Malice » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:48 pm

kevin0201 wrote:
Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...
Yes, you definitely have a chance at NU via ED. Here are some folks with 168s and lower GPAs that were accepted with a full ride this cycle:

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MeowMix77
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jaredcal
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Wildcats17

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM ED GWU or take chances with T14?

Post by kevin0201 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:06 pm

Ti Malice wrote:
kevin0201 wrote:
Mullens wrote:Don't ED GWU. I'll be interested to see where this year's LSAT medians fall because it will greatly impact your cycle but you should blanket the T14.
Do I have any chances with EDing NU? There's no one similar to my numbers on myLSN...
Yes, you definitely have a chance at NU via ED. Here are some folks with 168s and lower GPAs that were accepted with a full ride this cycle:

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MeowMix77
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jaredcal
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Wildcats17
Yeah. I made the GPA range wider and found that 1 person out of 3 was accepted ED at NU.
Is the number small because I'm a reverse splitter?

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by kevin0201 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:07 pm

I'm entertaining the idea of EDing NU and blanketing T14 and some more.

Yay or nay?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
twenty

Gold
Posts: 3189
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by twenty » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:29 pm

Blanket the T20. I'd be absolutely shocked if you didn't end up with at least one full ride.

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by kevin0201 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:37 pm

twenty wrote:Blanket the T20. I'd be absolutely shocked if you didn't end up with at least one full ride.
Thanks!

daleearnhardt123

Bronze
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by daleearnhardt123 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:03 pm

The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by kevin0201 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:25 pm

daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


daleearnhardt123

Bronze
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by daleearnhardt123 » Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:34 pm

kevin0201 wrote:
daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.
Here's a vet with pretty much identical #s (shade worse than yours really): http://lawschoolnumbers.com/zbollenb

Unfortunately this person only applied to 3 schools and didn't post scholly amts. Nonetheless, I think this should demonstrate that EDing GW would be an awful choice.

kevin0201

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by kevin0201 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:40 am

daleearnhardt123 wrote:
kevin0201 wrote:
daleearnhardt123 wrote:The people in this thread have been wildly pessimistic. Knowing a good # of vets at my T10, I can confidently say that you should expect a LOT of money from many of the bottom T14. Your #s are good as is, and as a vet you're absolutely certain to out-perform them. I think you're better than even money at every school from the T6 on down, and an outside chance at H and S.
That sounds too good to be true haha. Being a vet is a good soft, but my impression was that it would give me the boost of a half a point on LSAT.
Here's a vet with pretty much identical #s (shade worse than yours really): http://lawschoolnumbers.com/zbollenb

Unfortunately this person only applied to 3 schools and didn't post scholly amts. Nonetheless, I think this should demonstrate that EDing GW would be an awful choice.
Yeah not EDing GWU no more. I was so sure I bombed the June LSAT.

Thanks for so much useful information! Are you a vet yourself?

winstonsalem

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:12 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by winstonsalem » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:48 am

Here are some other profiles of vets,

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/r-t87

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/thedave29

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/twobitrye

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/goreman

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bahama

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/matthewsean85

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/SchusterFlook

By the way, I know of vets with LSATs around 167-168 who made it into H and Y as non-URMs. You should apply to literally all of the top 14, including Y, as your military credentials will be worth much more than half a point on the LSAT.

daleearnhardt123

Bronze
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: 168/3.91/Military/non-URM

Post by daleearnhardt123 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:06 am

winstonsalem wrote:Here are some other profiles of vets,

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/r-t87

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/thedave29

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/twobitrye

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/goreman

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bahama

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/matthewsean85

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/SchusterFlook

By the way, I know of vets with LSATs around 167-168 who made it into H and Y as non-URMs. You should apply to literally all of the top 14, including Y, as your military credentials will be worth much more than half a point on the LSAT.
Responding again just to echo this. Law schools love vets. Good work ethics and you all outperform your #s at OCI regularly, which is great for the school's employment stats. Not a vet myself, just happen to know a good #.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “What are my chances?”