3.8 Forum
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/darascal
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/salsero
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/caciqueYara
Check these profiles out from last cycle. You're below both medians for t14 schools. Salsero's cycle may be most indicative of yours, although his GPA/LSAT are slightly higher. Search on LSN if you need more info.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/salsero
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/caciqueYara
Check these profiles out from last cycle. You're below both medians for t14 schools. Salsero's cycle may be most indicative of yours, although his GPA/LSAT are slightly higher. Search on LSN if you need more info.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
- BLUERUFiO
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:46 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
Checking out these profiles made me very curious about which school they chose to attend.
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
I think salsero went to UCI and rascal is still among us. No clue about cacique.I wish they would update their profiles for future MA/PR applicants.BLUERUFiO wrote:Checking out these profiles made me very curious about which school they chose to attend.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
Best case scenario you're looking at a WL at this point. Maybe a WL>acceptance in the summer depending on how this cycle shakes out in general.applyinglate wrote:so basically out of the t14? Because that's what I saw on those profiles.BentleyLittle wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/darascal
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/salsero
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/caciqueYara
Check these profiles out from last cycle. You're below both medians for t14 schools. Salsero's cycle may be most indicative of yours, although his GPA/LSAT are slightly higher. Search on LSN if you need more info.
also hispanic = mexican in lsn?
I would look up MA, Mexican, Mexican American, PR, etc. PR/Mexicans are the only hispanics that seem to receive some sort of URM boost.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
I really couldn't give you advice on a certain school. Even those guys got WL'd and never got called back. Honestly, if you're set on applying this cycle I'd retake in February. I think today is the last day to register. Otherwise, retake in June/September and apply early next cycle.
You could also be wasting hundreds on applications. Use that $ on a retake.
You could also be wasting hundreds on applications. Use that $ on a retake.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
A retake for me is difficult. English isn’t my first language, and according to my pt averages a 162 was one point above my past 5 tests average.
Even if you can’t predict, any guesses?
Even if you can’t predict, any guesses?
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
Well congrats on the 162 as an ESL! Lots of people can't break 160 with English as a first language. I think if you're smart enough to score a 162, a couple more points could be within your reach. You have nothing to lose as schools take your highest score.applyinglate wrote:A retake for me is difficult. English isn’t my first language, and according to my pt averages a 162 was one point above my past 5 tests average.
Even if you can’t predict, any guesses?
With that being said, you're applying late with your stats. There was a MA URM with a 160 that got Cornell earlier in the cycle but she applied in September.
Where do you want to practice? Have you thought about a strong regional? I know Iowa (maybe a full ride) and Illinois would give you decent money with your stats.
Last edited by BentleyLittle on Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
[2
Last edited by applyinglate on Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
If you want to be in California you really need to retake. You're probably out at S, B, USC, UCLA. Irvine is a toss up but you probably wouldn't get much $. Those are really the only schools worth going to from what I understand.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
would berk be an instant out for me?BentleyLittle wrote:If you want to be in California you really need to retake. You're probably out at S, B, USC, UCLA. Irvine is a toss up but you probably wouldn't get much $. Those are really the only schools worth going to from what I understand.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
I would say so.applyinglate wrote:would berk be an instant out for me?BentleyLittle wrote:If you want to be in California you really need to retake. You're probably out at S, B, USC, UCLA. Irvine is a toss up but you probably wouldn't get much $. Those are really the only schools worth going to from what I understand.

-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
Seems like I have a shot at cornell?
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
you didnt.eaternation wrote:sent u a pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
Couldn't hurt if you really wanted to throw an app. But all those people that were admitted applied early.applyinglate wrote:Seems like I have a shot at cornell?
Also, see this thread http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=222406
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
Thanks.BentleyLittle wrote:Couldn't hurt if you really wanted to throw an app. But all those people that were admitted applied early.applyinglate wrote:Seems like I have a shot at cornell?
Also, see this thread http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=222406
Also whats up with HLS and Uchi?
How much difference does applying early makes for urm?
- BentleyLittle
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
Chicago definitely prefers that you apply early so I would save your money there. And H would be a hail mary unless you retake in Feb and kill it.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: 3.58 162 URM
I see. Oh well. I guess I can try to retake...BentleyLittle wrote:Chicago definitely prefers that you apply early so I would save your money there. And H would be a hail mary unless you retake in Feb and kill it.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login