3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history Forum
-
Rainy
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:10 pm
3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Thanks for the help guys.
Last edited by Rainy on Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
thewaves
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 7:26 pm
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Shoot for HYS, you're a lock for CCN
-
Rainy
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?
-
Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
.
Last edited by Dr.Zer0 on Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Softs, LOR, resumes are TTT.Rainy wrote:Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?
Enjoy CCN.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
SupCutie
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:27 pm
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Dude... 175. Drop the mic and enjoy T6.Rainy wrote:Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?
-
Rainy
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
Thanks for the help so far guys - it's much appreciated and I'm feeling a lot better. One final question and I'll leave you all alone and fly majestically into the sunset. How much of a boost does applying ED to Columbia give me? I'd rather go to Stanford, but I don't want to waste my ED opportunity and I'm not sure my chances at the former (as a note I have 3 close family members - sister/parents - who attended Stanford UG, although I doubt admissions gives a rat's ass). Thoughts?
Once again, thank you so much for your time.
Once again, thank you so much for your time.
-
MoMettaMonk
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history
http://www.admissionsbythenumbers.com/Rainy wrote:Thanks for the help so far guys - it's much appreciated and I'm feeling a lot better. One final question and I'll leave you all alone and fly majestically into the sunset. How much of a boost does applying ED to Columbia give me? I'd rather go to Stanford, but I don't want to waste my ED opportunity and I'm not sure my chances at the former (as a note I have 3 close family members - sister/parents - who attended Stanford UG, although I doubt admissions gives a rat's ass). Thoughts?
Once again, thank you so much for your time.
From what we can tell, EDing to Columbia provides no boost, or a boost so small as to not be statistically significant. Generally speaking, a candidate like you EDing is awesome for Columbia, and a pretty bad deal for you.
