Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA Forum
-
Hopeful_Splitter

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:14 am
Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
27 Years old with 5 years of WE. (3 years Corporate (non-law related) and 2 years entrepreneurial)
172 LSAT
2.7 GPA (worked throughout college, but definitely could have managed time more efficiently)
What schools should I submit an application for?
Will schools look at my lack of legal work experience as a negative?
172 LSAT
2.7 GPA (worked throughout college, but definitely could have managed time more efficiently)
What schools should I submit an application for?
Will schools look at my lack of legal work experience as a negative?
-
nebula666

- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
Enjoy Northwestern
-
Pancakes12

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:13 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
I would say ED at Northwestern (for the full scholarship) is worth a try with that LSAT and WE. Lack of legal experience is inconsequential.
- Icculus

- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
OP should ED because I think it would give him an RD bump but no way that GPA gets him the $50k/year.jlb251 wrote:I would say ED at Northwestern (for the full scholarship) is worth a try with that LSAT and WE. Lack of legal experience is inconsequential.
-
Hopeful_Splitter

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:14 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
Thank you for the replies.
I am planning on applying to NU, GULC, UVA, UCI, UC Hastings. I'm from SoCal.
Are there any schools that I am overlooking?
I am planning on applying to NU, GULC, UVA, UCI, UC Hastings. I'm from SoCal.
Are there any schools that I am overlooking?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
Throw out UCI and Hastings and apply to USC and UCLA.Hopeful_Splitter wrote:Thank you for the replies.
I am planning on applying to NU, GULC, UVA, UCI, UC Hastings. I'm from SoCal.
Are there any schools that I am overlooking?
- Icculus

- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
USC and UCLA are unlikely to take a sub 3.0.Winston1984 wrote:Throw out UCI and Hastings and apply to USC and UCLA.Hopeful_Splitter wrote:Thank you for the replies.
I am planning on applying to NU, GULC, UVA, UCI, UC Hastings. I'm from SoCal.
Are there any schools that I am overlooking?
-
Ti Malice

- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
I have no idea why we keep seeing this advice here. NU does not give out full rides to people with bad GPAs. The purpose of the full-ride ED is to lure applicants from CCN, not to lock down splitters for median maintenance.jlb251 wrote:I would say ED at Northwestern (for the full scholarship) is worth a try with that LSAT and WE.
OP, you have a strong shot at RD admission to NU.
- MT Cicero

- Posts: 692
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
.
Last edited by MT Cicero on Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Clearly

- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
jlb251 wrote:I would say ED at Northwestern (for the full scholarship) is worth a try with that LSAT and WE. Lack of legal experience is inconsequential.
-
Hopeful_Splitter

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:14 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
I am definitely not expecting a scholly from NU. Do you guys think that the decline in applications will continue this year?
-
haus

- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:07 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
My guess is the the decline will continue, but the rate of decline will lessen.Hopeful_Splitter wrote:I am definitely not expecting a scholly from NU. Do you guys think that the decline in applications will continue this year?
- Clearly

- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
I'm gonna guess the other way. June LSAT registrations were down 5% from last year, we'll have a much better idea after Oct registration release, but it doesn't seem to be getting better.haus wrote:My guess is the the decline will continue, but the rate of decline will lessen.Hopeful_Splitter wrote:I am definitely not expecting a scholly from NU. Do you guys think that the decline in applications will continue this year?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Hopeful_Splitter

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:14 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
Guys, I appreciate all your help. Thanks again. Time to get started on my Personal statements.
- bananasplit19

- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:53 pm
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
Near-exact stats, CA boy, and same age when I applied last cycle. Got some cash from NU and GULC after riding waitlists, and am at Northwestern now. Applying to Hastings was a waste of time, but UCI gave me a full ride which was tempting, and was at least valuable for negotiating purposes. Ditto for WUSTL, which you should definitely add to your list, even if you have no intention of going.
If I could do it again? I'd be curious to see what an ED to UVA would've yielded (although looking back on it now, I'm glad I'm here and not in Virginia). Also would've tossed an app to UCLA and USC. I didn't apply to those two because, as above posters have noted, it wasn't likely I'd get in. But you never know in today's law school app world. And if you do get in, it's better to have too many options as opposed to too few. PM me if you have questions; best of luck!
If I could do it again? I'd be curious to see what an ED to UVA would've yielded (although looking back on it now, I'm glad I'm here and not in Virginia). Also would've tossed an app to UCLA and USC. I didn't apply to those two because, as above posters have noted, it wasn't likely I'd get in. But you never know in today's law school app world. And if you do get in, it's better to have too many options as opposed to too few. PM me if you have questions; best of luck!
-
optimist1

- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
does ding mean u get rejected or accepted?
-
haus

- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:07 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
rejectedoptimist1 wrote:does ding mean u get rejected or accepted?
- jingosaur

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Older Splitter 172 LSAT, 2.7 GPA
Good application strategy, but get rid of UC Hastings since they basically decided to because a third tier school (LSAT median dropped to a 159 this year). If I were you, I'd shoot applications out to UCLA, USC, and UCI, because UCI will probably give you a full ride (don't go if they dont) and there's still a chance, albeit a small one, that UCI still can place students into jobs. Northwestern is probably the best fit for someone with your numbers.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login