/ Forum

indo · Post by **indo** » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:23 am

djwjddl wrote:Berkeley?
2 year WE
3 outstanding recs

95% accepted

djwjddl · Post by **djwjddl** » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:04 pm

seems a bit high? bump

FloridaCoastalorbust · Post by **FloridaCoastalorbust** » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:27 pm

Just go to the other sites. There are many data points for you.

helix23 · Post by **helix23** » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:36 pm

Someone out there correct me if I'm wrong, but Berkeley seems to be one of the most difficult of the T14 to predict based on numbers. It seems like they put a big emphasis on diversity and unusual softs as opposed to just numbers.

A lot of red: http://berkeley.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1112/

Rahviveh · Post by **Rahviveh** » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:43 pm

helix23 wrote:Someone out there correct me if I'm wrong, but Berkeley seems to be one of the most difficult of the T14 to predict based on numbers. It seems like they put a big emphasis on diversity and unusual softs as opposed to just numbers.

A lot of red: http://berkeley.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1112/

Accurate to an extent. You still need the numbers to get in, so softs wont overcome weak numbers, but they seem to look for other things even for strong candidates.

That said, the graph isnt all that different from their peers like P or V, except they reject people instead of waitlisting them.

/ Forum

/

Re: 169;3.85

Re: 169;3.85

Re: 169;3.85

Re: 169;3.85

Re: 169;3.85

Register now to search topics and post comments!