3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia Forum
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:49 pm
3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
non-URM, current Teach for America corps member
Please also chance me at the T7
Please also chance me at the T7
- jrthor10
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:33 am
Re: 3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
Did you graduate in 2012?
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:56 pm
Re: 3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
So are you applying this cycle? Isn't TFA a 2 year program? Either way I think you have a decent shot.
-
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am
Re: 3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
I think you have a decent shot at Columbia, but my guess is less than 50% (or maybe 50/50). I think you will get at least one T7 acceptance though. Also, I would throw out a Stanford app just in case.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: 3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
Thanks guys. In answer to the above question, if accepted anywhere I will defer for one year to finish my TFA 2-year commitment. Schools typically allow you to defer for TFA.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: 3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
Do you think CLS and other T7 schools will average my two LSATs, consider only the higher, or put more emphasis on the higher?
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: 3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
Jesus Christ. You're borderline at the T7. Throw them all an app and pray for a good outcome.tarheel12 wrote:Do you think CLS and other T7 schools will average my two LSATs, consider only the higher, or put more emphasis on the higher?
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: 3.89 / 165 then 169 / ED Columbia
They only consider the highest. Heard it from the Admissions Director at a presentation.tarheel12 wrote:Do you think CLS and other T7 schools will average my two LSATs, consider only the higher, or put more emphasis on the higher?