* Forum
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: 3.99/167
I think everywhere in the T-14 is "worth the app" for you, although HYS are unlikely with your LSAT, particularly H and Y. Those are really solid numbers though, so apply broadly and see what happens.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:11 pm
Re: 3.99/167
Bump. I'm interested to know whether Stanford is in play, and what you all think my shot is at CNMVP.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: 3.99/167
Stanford could be in play depending upon the rest of your application; obviously, your LSAT is the key obstacle for you to overcome.
- Puffin
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:17 pm
Re: 3.99/167
Stanford is incredibly unlikely with a 167, (It's at their 25th I believe) barring truly stellar softs.CanadianWolf wrote:Stanford could be in play depending upon the rest of your application; obviously, your LSAT is the key obstacle for you to overcome.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:11 pm
Re: 3.99/167
What would qualify as "stellar?" My softs and GPA were enough to get me to the final round of the Rhodes Scholarship.Puffin wrote:Stanford is incredibly unlikely with a 167, (It's at their 25th I believe) barring truly stellar softs.CanadianWolf wrote:Stanford could be in play depending upon the rest of your application; obviously, your LSAT is the key obstacle for you to overcome.
- Puffin
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:17 pm
Re: 3.99/167
Being a Rhodes Scholar. However that would display that you have significantly better than average softs. Would be worth an app.
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: 3.99/167
Retake the LSAT and reapply.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:11 pm
Re: 3.99/167
See above: the 167 was my third time in under two years and I'm pretty intent on applying now.Doorkeeper wrote:Retake the LSAT and reapply.