4.0/174 Forum
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
4.0/174
The LSN graph lists me at about 90% for Harvard, but LSAC puts me at 50-60%. Anyone know why the discrepancy and which is more accurate?
- alwayssunnyinfl
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: 4.0/174
LSAC has access to more data, I'd predict.giuseppes12 wrote:The LSN graph lists me at about 90% for Harvard, but LSAC puts me at 50-60%. Anyone know why the discrepancy and which is more accurate?
-
- Posts: 706
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:42 pm
Re: 4.0/174
LSAC's predictor is totally screwed. Use LSN. You are in at Harvard, some money CCN, and a lot more money lower T-14. As to Y/S, a lot depends on softs. Probably coin toss on Y/S.
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: 4.0/174
I feel like more data wouldn't move it from 90% to 50%, though. Unless the LSN data is unrepresentative somehow... dissonance why do you think the LSAC predictor is inaccurate?alwayssunnyinfl wrote:LSAC has access to more data, I'd predict.giuseppes12 wrote:The LSN graph lists me at about 90% for Harvard, but LSAC puts me at 50-60%. Anyone know why the discrepancy and which is more accurate?
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: 4.0/174
Why does it matter why LSAC's calculator is off. You know your numbers and you know what schools they will probably land you.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: 4.0/174
Doesn't the LSAC predictor make it's predictions based on score bands? Since the median is encompassed within the score band, maybe that's why. Regardless, like Miller said, who cares? LSN is a record of actual people. And why do you need exact percentages? Your chances are very high, so apply and hope for the best.giuseppes12 wrote:I feel like more data wouldn't move it from 90% to 50%, though. Unless the LSN data is unrepresentative somehow... dissonance why do you think the LSAC predictor is inaccurate?alwayssunnyinfl wrote:LSAC has access to more data, I'd predict.giuseppes12 wrote:The LSN graph lists me at about 90% for Harvard, but LSAC puts me at 50-60%. Anyone know why the discrepancy and which is more accurate?
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: 4.0/174
Well hopefully people actually have a solid reason for thinking the LSAC predictor is off, not just hearsay lol. And 50% vs. 90% makes a difference for how I structure the application; e.g. my app to Yale is gonna be substantially different than my app to NYUSamara wrote:Doesn't the LSAC predictor make it's predictions based on score bands? Since the median is encompassed within the score band, maybe that's why. Regardless, like Miller said, who cares? LSN is a record of actual people. And why do you need exact percentages? Your chances are very high, so apply and hope for the best.giuseppes12 wrote:I feel like more data wouldn't move it from 90% to 50%, though. Unless the LSN data is unrepresentative somehow... dissonance why do you think the LSAC predictor is inaccurate?alwayssunnyinfl wrote:LSAC has access to more data, I'd predict.giuseppes12 wrote:The LSN graph lists me at about 90% for Harvard, but LSAC puts me at 50-60%. Anyone know why the discrepancy and which is more accurate?
-
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Re: 4.0/174
What?giuseppes12 wrote: And 50% vs. 90% makes a difference for how I structure the application
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: 4.0/174
if it's 50% he can write a personal statement about succeeding against unlikely oddsBumi wrote:What?giuseppes12 wrote: And 50% vs. 90% makes a difference for how I structure the application