LSAT: 173
Top 25 UG, Business major, No URM status.
Chances at T6 please

I know that law school admissions are (nearly) all numbers-based, but how come on Lawschoolnumbers.com I still see some waitlists above the average stats?
Shitty Apps or Yield Protection.crazi4law wrote: I know that law school admissions are (nearly) all numbers-based, but how come on Lawschoolnumbers.com I still see some waitlists above the average stats?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'm not sure about Columbia, but NYU definitely does.PigBodine wrote:NYU and Columbia don't give an ED boost.
What do you base that on? I'm not sure I see anyone on the list of acceptances who wouldn't have had a great chance coming through the front door. While it's possible that it might break a tie (though there's really no way to prove that), it's definitely very different from MVP's ED system, where's it'll give you a very consistent, very measurable boost.hdsoc wrote:I'm not sure about Columbia, but NYU definitely does.PigBodine wrote:NYU and Columbia don't give an ED boost.
This doesn't make sense. Why would they offer Ed then? And if it's just to get as many good students as they can and they give no boost in return, don't you think word would get out?PigBodine wrote:NYU and Columbia don't give an ED boost.
1. If you look at most schools' ED information, they say point blank that it's just a speed of response thing and that they evaluate students according to the same standards as RD students. At a lot of schools (G, M, P, V) this is a total fiction akin to their claiming to average LSAT scores and they're just saying that in an effort to be as non-transparent as possible. At NYU & Columbia, it seems like the boilerplate ED stuff is actually the case. That it's just a speed of response thing. Although the sample size is really small, there's just no clear evidence that the boost is there. It's possible that the people hdsoc is pointing to might not have gotten in RD, but, on the other hand, they might have. They definitely would have been competitive. Last cycle, they took RD 173s all the way down to 3.3. FlamingCow had a 3.7, not a 3.5, plus a lot of work experience. People with those kind of stats have been getting in RD throughout this cycle and the last one. On top of that, a lot of EDers with solid stats got rejected. The only outright ding at the 173+ 3.5+ level from NYU was to an EDer.Br3v wrote:This doesn't make sense. Why would they offer Ed then? And if it's just to get as many good students as they can and they give no boost in return, don't you think word would get out?PigBodine wrote:NYU and Columbia don't give an ED boost.
1. Increases yield.Br3v wrote:This doesn't make sense. Why would they offer Ed then? And if it's just to get as many good students as they can and they give no boost in return, don't you think word would get out?PigBodine wrote:NYU and Columbia don't give an ED boost.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Maybe you should take a closer look. Those LSN numbers, while limited, actually appear to show a pretty clear ED boost at NYU. The lowest GPA by far in the 172 column came from a non-URM admitted ED applicant, and two of the four lowest GPAs in that column did. Same with the lowest GPA among 180 scorers (again, by far). The lowest GPA among 170 scorers came from a non-URM admitted ED applicant (tied with one other, actually). One of only two non-URM applicants accepted with a 167 was an ED applicant. Two of the four lowest GPAs among 169 scorers came from non-URM admitted applicants; one of the people lower than these two was a PhD and a saxophonist who had won national and international awards.PigBodine wrote:What do you base that on? I'm not sure I see anyone on the list of acceptances who wouldn't have had a great chance coming through the front door. While it's possible that it might break a tie (though there's really no way to prove that), it's definitely very different from MVP's ED system, where's it'll give you a very consistent, very measurable boost.hdsoc wrote:I'm not sure about Columbia, but NYU definitely does.PigBodine wrote:NYU and Columbia don't give an ED boost.
http://nyu.lawschoolnumbers.com/applica ... =3&type=jd
Lol. So you think they're telling the truth by saying ED provides no boost (which makes no sense), but lying when they say everyone is evaluated equally for scholarships and financial aid? You can't have it both ways.Doorkeeper wrote:1. Increases yield.Br3v wrote:This doesn't make sense. Why would they offer Ed then? And if it's just to get as many good students as they can and they give no boost in return, don't you think word would get out?PigBodine wrote:NYU and Columbia don't give an ED boost.
2. Decreases scholarship money to give out.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login