Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163 Forum
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:06 am
Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163
GPA dropped from 3.7 to 3.39 because I got cocky and tried to learn Mandarin for my required language.
LSAT taken on 3 hours sleep, luckily I stumbled through it with a 163 (though I was testing around 168).
Lame excuses aside, I have limited funds for applications and I'm hoping the military background will give me at least enough soft skills to wiggle my way into the 20-35, shooting for UW madison, but what are some of my better options in this range. I know T-14 is a waste of time.
LSAT taken on 3 hours sleep, luckily I stumbled through it with a 163 (though I was testing around 168).
Lame excuses aside, I have limited funds for applications and I'm hoping the military background will give me at least enough soft skills to wiggle my way into the 20-35, shooting for UW madison, but what are some of my better options in this range. I know T-14 is a waste of time.
- Eirhoff73
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:26 pm
Re: Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163
I've heard that military is a plus.
- 2LT_CPG
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163
Bump. I'm an Army officer and I want to know more about this supposed bump.
- burndtscorcho
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:47 pm
Re: Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163
Fellow military as well... want to see where this goes.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:06 am
Re: Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163
Just started looking up, my transfer GPA brought me up to an LSAT GPA of 3.7. Got an outside chance at the bottom of T14 with an epic personal statement
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163
Retake, and sleep this time for God's sake.
- 2LT_CPG
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Military GPA 3.39 LSAT 163
Do admissions committees view currently serving reservists and guardsmen who havent yet deployed vastly differently from vets with deployments? I've read a few things on this board that have divergent views on that point. Some say they only care or give you a URM-like bump if you've been deployed a few times and have a CIB with a personal statement that rocks. Others say any service at all is treated almost all the same.
Obviously they want to get as many vets in as they can, and rightly so, but I feel like the run of the mill adcomm folks see a military-oriented personal statement with the 'Military Service' tab filled out on the application and treat everything the same; and they shouldn't.
Obviously they want to get as many vets in as they can, and rightly so, but I feel like the run of the mill adcomm folks see a military-oriented personal statement with the 'Military Service' tab filled out on the application and treat everything the same; and they shouldn't.