170/ 3.8 Forum
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Blanket T14. Will get acceptances in T6. Will get $ from lesser T14's.
lawschoolnumbers.com
lawschoolpredictor.com
Go forth and prosper.
lawschoolnumbers.com
lawschoolpredictor.com
Go forth and prosper.
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
i have similar numbers although I'm not sure how much that one point counts (170 just sounds SO much better than 169); applied to a number of T20 but just got my apps in last weekend so haven't heard anything yet; you should get your apps in ASAP though; would be very interested to see how your cycle goes, good luck!
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
I'm waiting until this weekend to send in my apps. In case I bomb the LSAT and cancel my scores, I don't want them to see that second test date. On the other side of that if I feel I did really well I'm going to write an addendum.
Bad idea?
Bad idea?
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Just send them now. Honestly your score now is pretty good and it will take them a while to get to your app since you're applying a little later. You might want to list that you're re-taking for schools you're borderline at so they know.viacavour wrote:I'm waiting until this weekend to send in my apps. In case I bomb the LSAT and cancel my scores, I don't want them to see that second test date. On the other side of that if I feel I did really well I'm going to write an addendum.
Bad idea?
Don't write an addendum until you get your score back. There is nothing more embarrassing than sending in an addendum to explain a score jump and then finding out that you didn't improve by much or actually scored lower.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
A 170 is pretty significant over a 169, because it's median/above median for a lot of T14 schools whereas 169 isn't. Also, people just are subconsciously biased when they see the number (IMO, not grounded in science or anythingcactuarX3 wrote:i have similar numbers although I'm not sure how much that one point counts (170 just sounds SO much better than 169); applied to a number of T20 but just got my apps in last weekend so haven't heard anything yet; you should get your apps in ASAP though; would be very interested to see how your cycle goes, good luck!

FWIW though, Michigan/Penn/Cornell/Duke/Boalt seem to be very friendly to high GPA/slightly lower LSATs, so you have a great shot there! (:
And I agree--OP, get your apps in ASAP.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
you can submit additional addenda even after your app has been received?crumpetsandtea wrote:
Don't write an addendum until you get your score back.
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Yep, you can. They will understand, especially if you've just had a change to your app you need to explain (higher LSAT for example).viacavour wrote:you can submit additional addenda even after your app has been received?crumpetsandtea wrote:Don't write an addendum until you get your score back.
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
argggh, so there is a big difference? goddamn, if it's literally ONE question on the LSAT that ruins my chances of getting into T14, I'm going to jump out the 20th story window of my office
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
I mean there's a difference, but don't freak out too bad. Your GPA is still high so you should get some good news. I'd suggest considering a retake to get off WLs/to get money though. (:cactuarX3 wrote:argggh, so there is a big difference? goddamn, if it's literally ONE question on the LSAT that ruins my chances of getting into T14, I'm going to jump out the 20th story window of my office
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:42 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Just send in your app now. Seriously. Apply to the entire T14, and you'll get in somewhere (likely more than one place). A 170 is high enough for an excellent school. It's not worth it to retake.
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
any data on LSN to support that (e.g. lots of 170s getting in and then all of a sudden very few 169s getting in with similar GPAs?)crumpetsandtea wrote:cactuarX3 wrote:Technically there's only a sliver of a difference, but oftentimes schools will set a soft floor there.
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
You're free to go look if you'd like. (:cactuarX3 wrote:any data on LSN to support that (e.g. lots of 170s getting in and then all of a sudden very few 169s getting in with similar GPAs?)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
glanced at a few graphs at some of the T14 schools; looks like in many cases, acceptances at 170 turned into WLs at 169; damn, looks like i got a few tickets for the WL train this cycle
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Again, I'd recommend considering a retake: worst case, it doesn't help. Best case, you get into a school you might not have, or you get $$! I had a friend with a 3.8X/168 who got WL-ed at Michigan; retook in June, got a 171 and got in off the WL with a half scholarship. I know it's just an anecdote and 1 example, but IMO that one shot makes it worth it.cactuarX3 wrote:glanced at a few graphs at some of the T14 schools; looks like in many cases, acceptances at 170 turned into WLs at 169; damn, looks like i got a few tickets for the WL train this cycle
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
wait, so he was still riding the waitlist in June (as in 2-3 months before school was going to start?) and they still considered that score? AND had a spot for him AND had money left over?
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: 170/ 3.8
This happens all the time. People often double or triple deposit and don't make their final decision until June or July.cactuarX3 wrote:wait, so he was still riding the waitlist in June (as in 2-3 months before school was going to start?) and they still considered that score? AND had a spot for him AND had money left over?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Aren't people discouraged if not prohibited from double depositing? I thought when you deposit at a school, you're supposed to withdraw from all the other schools you got into, but you're not obligated to withdraw from any waitlists.Tiago Splitter wrote:This happens all the time. People often double or triple deposit and don't make their final decision until June or July.cactuarX3 wrote:wait, so he was still riding the waitlist in June (as in 2-3 months before school was going to start?) and they still considered that score? AND had a spot for him AND had money left over?
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Yep. And they got back to him in like, a week. People get off the waitlist as late as July/August. The friend I mentioned in this quote:cactuarX3 wrote:wait, so he was still riding the waitlist in June (as in 2-3 months before school was going to start?) and they still considered that score? AND had a spot for him AND had money left over?
Didn't get accepted into UChi until mid-August. He'd already found an apartment in a city for a different T14 but decided to find a subleaser and go to Chi anyway.Anecdotally, I have a friend with a 3.9X and a similar LSAT score to the two of you who got WL/A at Chicago.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: 170/ 3.8
None of the schools I was accepted to had this language in their acceptance letters. I believe the second deposit, usually due in June or July, is the one that also requires withdrawal of other apps. The second one seems to also be much more expensive, so that aspect also helps force a decision. I'm also under the impression that schools can find out from LSAC whether people have open apps at other schools after a certain date (like June 15th.)soj wrote:Aren't people discouraged if not prohibited from double depositing? I thought when you deposit at a school, you're supposed to withdraw from all the other schools you got into, but you're not obligated to withdraw from any waitlists.Tiago Splitter wrote:This happens all the time. People often double or triple deposit and don't make their final decision until June or July.cactuarX3 wrote:wait, so he was still riding the waitlist in June (as in 2-3 months before school was going to start?) and they still considered that score? AND had a spot for him AND had money left over?
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
You're probably right. I was thinking of the second deposit.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: 170/ 3.8
Everything Crumps has told you in this thread is sound advice (she's smart). That said, don't have a panic attack. I'm 3.27/169 and got Mich (granted, ED). With a much better GPA, you're going to see some T14 love somewhere.cactuarX3 wrote:argggh, so there is a big difference? goddamn, if it's literally ONE question on the LSAT that ruins my chances of getting into T14, I'm going to jump out the 20th story window of my office
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: 170/ 3.8
Umam, thanks for the vote of confidence!
Did you have any amazing softs/WE/URM?
Did you have any amazing softs/WE/URM?
- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: 170/ 3.8
I'm still in UG. Basically no softs, no WE, and white as rice. I am in-state and ED, but that's not supposed to be a big boost at Mich. I stand by what I said.cactuarX3 wrote:Umam, thanks for the vote of confidence!
Did you have any amazing softs/WE/URM?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login