2.3, 178 LSAT Forum

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
Post Reply
yacoal03

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:18 am

2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by yacoal03 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:30 am

Hey guys,




This is for the next cycle(I am currently working at my friend's photography company).

I know HYS is out of the way, but do I have any realistic shot at any t-14 schools(Georgetown or Northwestern?)

I am willing to go anywhere at this point right now.

I have zero to none soft(except a year of work experience at friend's company).

I can't say for sure, but my LOR are just average I think.

My gpa is very low, because my science major just raped the crap out of me my first two years of college(changed to poli-sci later

and was around 3.4..I am just terrible with chemistry :( ).


What do you think guys? I would appreciate any feedback or input.

Thank you!

minuit

Silver
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:39 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by minuit » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:43 am

Default response: Northwestern.

bobbyh1919

Silver
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:40 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by bobbyh1919 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:55 am

Holyyy crap. You are quite the splitter my friend. You're probably in for an incredibly unpredictable cycle. Just blanket the T-14 (not HYS) and hope for the best I suppose.

User avatar
law4vus

Silver
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by law4vus » Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:00 am

bobbyh1919 wrote:Holyyy crap. You are quite the splitter my friend. You're probably in for an incredibly unpredictable cycle. Just blanket the T-14 (not HYS) and hope for the best I suppose.
Gotta throw some of the splitter-friendly Tier 1s an app as well. I'm thinking WUSTL, Illinois, GW, Emory. There's so little data on that big of a split so who knows how this cycle will turn out.

User avatar
Neatrends

Bronze
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by Neatrends » Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:04 am

"ED to UVa!" =)

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


willwash

Bronze
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by willwash » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:28 pm

Chicago is notoriously splitter friendly, though their most recent full GPA range only started at 3.14...

User avatar
soj

Platinum
Posts: 7888
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by soj » Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:06 am

willwash wrote:Chicago is notoriously splitter friendly
I have never heard that.

User avatar
TaipeiMort

Silver
Posts: 869
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by TaipeiMort » Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:24 am

willwash wrote:Chicago is notoriously splitter friendly, though their most recent full GPA range only started at 3.14...
Do you mean NU?

User avatar
TaipeiMort

Silver
Posts: 869
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by TaipeiMort » Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:31 am

OP:

Your syntax is slightly off. Are you a nonnative English speaker? I think if you art, this may impact your cycle favorably. It will give adcomms a reason to accept you, as your LAST does a lot for them.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


005618502

Gold
Posts: 2577
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by 005618502 » Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:47 am

Obviously a flame. When someone tries to justify a 2.3 = flame. No one is that stupid. They would have said: I just didnt give a shit in classes, and a 3.4 in poli sci haha

User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by JamMasterJ » Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:12 am

minuit wrote:Default response: Northwestern.
correct response: Northwestern with the most remote chance at GULC. Otherwise, non-T14

I've never really seen GPAs quite that low on either schools graph accompanied by LSATs that high. However, there are somewhat similar results that lead me to think you have a shot at Northwestern at least

thelawyler

Silver
Posts: 941
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by thelawyler » Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:47 am

AssumptionRequired wrote:Obviously a flame. When someone tries to justify a 2.3 = flame. No one is that stupid. They would have said: I just didnt give a shit in classes, and a 3.4 in poli sci haha
Yup, thinking troll / flame.

User avatar
chill

Bronze
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:55 am

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by chill » Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:57 pm

.
Last edited by chill on Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
cool

New
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:48 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by cool » Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:55 pm

Flame.

User avatar
mrtoren

Silver
Posts: 733
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:43 pm

Re: 2.3, 178 LSAT

Post by mrtoren » Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:26 am

To anyone who posted a legitimate response to this thread..shame on you.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “What are my chances?”