3.962/159 AA Female Forum
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:12 pm
3.962/159 AA Female
1st post. Submitted a number of apps. Reverse splitter - Strong GPA, weak LSAT - 3.962 GPA, 159 LSAT, AA Female. Thoughts regarding T14? Additionally, D1 Athlete and member of Honors College.
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 am
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Retake, get a 165, go to Yale.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
I really do not want to retake, if accepted in a T14 or USC.
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
A 165 and a 159, both way below Yale's (and most t14's) 25%, are irrelevant. Apply to all T14 schools, I'm fairly sure you'll get into one or two.
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 am
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Quartile games don't work with URMs. With a 3.96 and her other achievements, a 165 would get her Yale.tennisking88 wrote:A 165 and a 159, both way below Yale's (and most t14's) 25%, are irrelevant. Apply to all T14 schools, I'm fairly sure you'll get into one or two.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sach1282
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:50 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
What? This is not true at all. By that logic the LSAT shouldn't matter at all to URMs at reach schools.tennisking88 wrote:A 165 and a 159, both way below Yale's (and most t14's) 25%, are irrelevant.
Last edited by sach1282 on Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Apply this cycle but don't go to USC or a lower T14. If you retake and get in the low to mid 160s it would probably solidify your chances of getting into HYS and having substantial scholarship offers from the mid-T14.
- sach1282
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:50 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
I agree that you should retake, the difference between USC/lower T14 and HYS or $$ at CCN is pretty substantial.
- Jack Smirks
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
I'm guessing you'll get into a few of the lower T-14s. I would still strongly consider a retake if you think you underperformed or have the capacity for any improvement at all.
- Rammstein
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 11:19 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Can you be talked out of going to law school?
- Opie
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:27 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Haha... Intimidated?Rammstein wrote:Can you be talked out of going to law school?
- Rammstein
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 11:19 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Opie wrote:Haha... Intimidated?Rammstein wrote:Can you be talked out of going to law school?
Yes. Very intimidated.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Thanks for all the feedback. At this point, I can just wait and hope, as a retake is not in the plans.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Hahaha. You really think *Yale* is playing that big a numbers game? What do they do, get all the professors in a room and say, we absolutely insist that you treat all LSAT scores below our 25% as identical? A 169 is no different from a 145. And if you don't, will figure it out, and...oh, right, you have tenure.tennisking88 wrote:A 165 and a 159, both way below Yale's (and most t14's) 25%, are irrelevant. Apply to all T14 schools, I'm fairly sure you'll get into one or two.
Obviously law schools play numbers games, but some people take this to absurd levels.
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:47 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
I really hope you are a troll.lsdream wrote:I really do not want to retake, if accepted in a T14 or USC.
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 5:00 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Exactly how badly do you not want to retake? Would you do it for $100k? Because that could be what you're looking at from numerous schools with much, much better placement than USC if you can hit 165. Wait until June, pick up about ten questions (get LG Bible and pick up 5+ in LG alone), score around 165, collect $100k at T14 of your choice. Don't waste your time, GPA, or money on anything less.lsdream wrote:I really do not want to retake, if accepted in a T14 or USC.
- cutecarmel
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:39 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
.
Last edited by cutecarmel on Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 89vision
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Awesome post.cutecarmel wrote:If you want to get into Yale, a retake is your only option.
Coming from another African American female, PLEASE do not play the race card. You want to go to Yale if you know that you are kick ass and better than everyone that got rejected. You don't want to be at a school where everyone thinks that you are the token black kid who only go accepted because she was black. If you want Yale, retake and bust your ass to score in the high 160s or 170s. Its not worth it if its not earned.
If you can't retake, apply to a lower ranked school where your are more qualified and shine there.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
I never expressed an interest in Yale. My post referenced t-14 schools or USC. Other posters suggested retaking and considering Yale.89vision wrote:Awesome post.cutecarmel wrote:If you want to get into Yale, a retake is your only option.
Coming from another African American female, PLEASE do not play the race card. You want to go to Yale if you know that you are kick ass and better than everyone that got rejected. You don't want to be at a school where everyone thinks that you are the token black kid who only go accepted because she was black. If you want Yale, retake and bust your ass to score in the high 160s or 170s. Its not worth it if its not earned.
If you can't retake, apply to a lower ranked school where your are more qualified and shine there.
- fathergoose
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
The real question is if you think that if you busted your ass for 6 months you could get 165+
If you can't then go to USC and kick ass.
If you think you could, then retake and go to hys or ccn or at the least mvp with $$$ or a full ride at USC.
It's worth taking a year off for. I know opportunity cost comes into all of this but I think it would be pay of significantly to retake if you thought you were capable of 165+
If you can't then go to USC and kick ass.
If you think you could, then retake and go to hys or ccn or at the least mvp with $$$ or a full ride at USC.
It's worth taking a year off for. I know opportunity cost comes into all of this but I think it would be pay of significantly to retake if you thought you were capable of 165+
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Dude, the logic you use to combat his logic is even more flawed. Just because the 25th percentile doesn't matter with regard to URMs doesn't mean that "the LSAT shouldn't matter at all."sach1282 wrote:What? This is not true at all. By that logic the LSAT shouldn't matter at all to URMs at reach schools.tennisking88 wrote:A 165 and a 159, both way below Yale's (and most t14's) 25%, are irrelevant.
OP, do what bdubs said. If you were able to score higher, you're looking at either A) substantial money or even a full ride to a school in the middle to upper T10, or B) acceptance to HYS, where obviously your financial aid would be more a product of your financial situation. Placement from USC doesn't hold a candle to your options with a T6 or T3 degree. Don't waste your strong credentials on a school that you can do better than (obviously your retake option is changed if the 159 was after months of study and was near the top of your PT range).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Pretty sure this is a troll based on that well-known UCLA athlete mentioned in the "law wives" thread.
- johansantana21
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Tbh, almost everyone assumes that URMs are there in a major part because of race. It's undeniable.cutecarmel wrote:If you want to get into Yale, a retake is your only option.
Coming from another African American female, PLEASE do not play the race card. You want to go to Yale if you know that you are kick ass and better than everyone that got rejected. You don't want to be at a school where everyone thinks that you are the token black kid who only go accepted because she was black. If you want Yale, retake and bust your ass to score in the high 160s or 170s. Its not worth it if its not earned.
If you can't retake, apply to a lower ranked school where your are more qualified and shine there.
That's not to say that people assume URMs are any less formidable.
But people do know you probably had a less qualified LSAT/GPA.
It's just fact.
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:27 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
It's not flawed, its just not (explicitly) stating a premise. If a "reach" is defined as being below 25th percentile, then saying the difference between two scores both below the 25th percentile is "irrelevant" is to say that the difference in LSAT doesn't matter at all for that "reach" subset.JamMasterJ wrote:Dude, the logic you use to combat his logic is even more flawed. Just because the 25th percentile doesn't matter with regard to URMs doesn't mean that "the LSAT shouldn't matter at all."sach1282 wrote:What? This is not true at all. By that logic the LSAT shouldn't matter at all to URMs at reach schools.tennisking88 wrote:A 165 and a 159, both way below Yale's (and most t14's) 25%, are irrelevant.
- JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: 3.962/159 AA Female
Look, I know how you feel. I've been there, but after months of thinking about it, I decided to retake and reapply.lsdream wrote:1st post. Submitted a number of apps. Reverse splitter - Strong GPA, weak LSAT - 3.962 GPA, 159 LSAT, AA Female. Thoughts regarding T14? Additionally, D1 Athlete and member of Honors College.
You are guaranteed a full ride at at least one T14 if you retake and reapply. Save yourself the debt. Retake, score 165+, go to Harvard.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login