3.82 / 164 URM Forum
-
denise512

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:12 am
3.82 / 164 URM
Hello,
I sent in an early decision application to Columbia a while ago. What do you think my chances are?
3.82 from a Top 50 school, LSAT (taken once) 164, URM (female)
Good softs (10 or so internships with law firms/law enforcement agencies)
Great recommendations
But I'm not sure whether these are enough to because of my LSAT score...
Thanks!
I sent in an early decision application to Columbia a while ago. What do you think my chances are?
3.82 from a Top 50 school, LSAT (taken once) 164, URM (female)
Good softs (10 or so internships with law firms/law enforcement agencies)
Great recommendations
But I'm not sure whether these are enough to because of my LSAT score...
Thanks!
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
I'm confused...the nature of your post makes it look like you think being female makes you a URM.
What type of URM are you?
What type of URM are you?
- moneybagsphd

- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
What kind of URM?denise512 wrote: URM (female)
-
lutcf2021

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:26 pm
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
would a white female not be considered URM?
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
Uh, no. White females, IIRC, are actually the most represented applicants.lutcf2021 wrote:would a white female not be considered URM?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
denise512

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:12 am
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
hahahahahha sorry it actually seems like I wrote URM due to being female
I'm mexican.
thank you for your comments!
thank you for your comments!
- Yukos

- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
There is pretty much no info on URMs ED'ing to Columbia, but in 2009 someone with the same GPA and lower LSAT was accepted, as was someone with a lower GPA but higher LSAT. Looks good, but the sample size is tiny/old.
Source: http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... =3&type=jd
Source: http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... =3&type=jd
-
Transferthrowaway

- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 am
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
Electric type. Strong against water type, weak against ground type.moneybagsphd wrote:What kind of URM?denise512 wrote: URM (female)
- top30man

- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:11 pm
Re: 3.82 / 164 URM
180Transferthrowaway wrote:Electric type. Strong against water type, weak against ground type.moneybagsphd wrote:What kind of URM?denise512 wrote: URM (female)