3.44 / 167 Forum
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
3.44 / 167
What should I shoot for?
I want to apply to some reaches and some 50/50 schools
Would Pitt be a sufficient "safety" school (any way they reject me?)
Some background... my 2nd semester I got a 0.00 and ever since I've gotten all 4.0's, so I have about as much of an upward trend as possible
I also am currently graduating from a HORRIBLE undergrad (local shitty college step up from community college)
My extras aren't that impressive (couple clubs, in a fraternity, etc...)
Reaches:
Northwestern
Texas
Vandy
50/50's
Washington-Miss
George Washington
ND
UNC
Ohio State
Safety
Pitt
Good list?
Are my reaches completely unrealistic (I'm a K-JD with minimal WE so is NorthWestern a waste?
I want to apply to some reaches and some 50/50 schools
Would Pitt be a sufficient "safety" school (any way they reject me?)
Some background... my 2nd semester I got a 0.00 and ever since I've gotten all 4.0's, so I have about as much of an upward trend as possible
I also am currently graduating from a HORRIBLE undergrad (local shitty college step up from community college)
My extras aren't that impressive (couple clubs, in a fraternity, etc...)
Reaches:
Northwestern
Texas
Vandy
50/50's
Washington-Miss
George Washington
ND
UNC
Ohio State
Safety
Pitt
Good list?
Are my reaches completely unrealistic (I'm a K-JD with minimal WE so is NorthWestern a waste?
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: 3.44 / 167
I've checked out LSN and law school predictor among others and is how I derived my list, but some offer some conflicting information... why I posted on here to try to get some human perspective on if that is a reasonable list / if I could expect a decent cycle if those are my goalsGrizz wrote:http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com
No one will care about your 0.00 or upward trend really.
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:23 pm
Re: 3.44 / 167
Grizz is helpful, right?
They will care about that 0.00. Send in an addendum and it will downplay it's importance.
You'll definitely get into Pitt. Anything over a 160 will get money. I had a friend with a similar GPA and a 162 and he got 14k or 17k, I can't remember. Your school won't play that big of a role, as the 167 is the great equalizer.
I would say you have a solid shot (with respect to reaches and targets) for each one. Maybe GW would fall under reach though.
Best of Luck!!
They will care about that 0.00. Send in an addendum and it will downplay it's importance.
You'll definitely get into Pitt. Anything over a 160 will get money. I had a friend with a similar GPA and a 162 and he got 14k or 17k, I can't remember. Your school won't play that big of a role, as the 167 is the great equalizer.
I would say you have a solid shot (with respect to reaches and targets) for each one. Maybe GW would fall under reach though.
Best of Luck!!
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.44 / 167
Always go with LSN over LSP. LSP and everyone here gets their info from LSN.ThreeRivers wrote:I've checked out LSN and law school predictor among others and is how I derived my list, but some offer some conflicting information... why I posted on here to try to get some human perspective on if that is a reasonable list / if I could expect a decent cycle if those are my goalsGrizz wrote:http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com
No one will care about your 0.00 or upward trend really.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: 3.44 / 167
So you guys view the 0.00 as a negative soft? (I was kind of hoping it would be a more positive aspect since it happened in 07 / my gpa woudl be 3.9 + without it), so they would view my GPA in better termsIncubateus wrote:Grizz is helpful, right?
They will care about that 0.00. Send in an addendum and it will downplay it's importance.
You'll definitely get into Pitt. Anything over a 160 will get money. I had a friend with a similar GPA and a 162 and he got 14k or 17k, I can't remember. Your school won't play that big of a role, as the 167 is the great equalizer.
I would say you have a solid shot (with respect to reaches and targets) for each one. Maybe GW would fall under reach though.
Best of Luck!!

-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:23 pm
Re: 3.44 / 167
I guess it depends on how you view it. It certainly doesn't help that you had one entirely bad semester but, for purposes of you addendum, you could absolutely use it in a positive light. It would definitely provide support that the reason for the poor grades was an isolated and intense incident.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.44 / 167
They'll view you as a 3.44. Everyone and their mother has an upward trend.ThreeRivers wrote: So you guys view the 0.00 as a negative soft? (I was kind of hoping it would be a more positive aspect since it happened in 07 / my gpa woudl be 3.9 + without it), so they would view my GPA in better terms
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: 3.44 / 167
Should I have the balls to ask my reaches (which will probably reject me) for fee waivers? lol... this is going to get really expensive, it can't hurt you (by them being insulted) if you ask such a school right?
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.44 / 167
Worst they can say is no.ThreeRivers wrote:Should I have the balls to ask my reaches (which will probably reject me) for fee waivers? lol... this is going to get really expensive, it can't hurt you (by them being insulted) if you ask such a school right?
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: 3.44 / 167
Well just sent fee waiver requests to all 9 of those schools lol
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: 3.44 / 167
Does anyone think I'm setting goals too high / is there a chance I get rejected at every school but Pitt?
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.44 / 167
ThreeRivers wrote:Does anyone think I'm setting goals too high / is there a chance I get rejected at every school but Pitt?
Grizz wrote:http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: 3.44 / 167
Lol yea its kind of hard when there is 1 or 2 with my numbers for some of themGrizz wrote:ThreeRivers wrote:Does anyone think I'm setting goals too high / is there a chance I get rejected at every school but Pitt?Grizz wrote:http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: 3.44 / 167
Pitt / Washington - Miss said yes to fee-waivers already (took a couple of hours)!
Vandy said they only send them through lsac.org / keep an eye out (probably a nice way to say no)
Vandy said they only send them through lsac.org / keep an eye out (probably a nice way to say no)
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.44 / 167
You're doing it wrong.ThreeRivers wrote:Lol yea its kind of hard when there is 1 or 2 with my numbers for some of themGrizz wrote:ThreeRivers wrote:Does anyone think I'm setting goals too high / is there a chance I get rejected at every school but Pitt?Grizz wrote:http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login