* Forum

daesonesb · Post by **daesonesb** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:31 pm

Fine I'll try.

ndirish2010 · Post by **ndirish2010** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:40 pm

UIUC you can get...WUSTL probably not anymore if they are raising their median to 168. I would also try GW, W&L, W&M, maybe Fordham...BC/BU like higher GPAs usually.

Mizz · Post by **Mizz** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:49 pm

ndirish2010 · Post by **ndirish2010** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:09 pm

Mizz wrote:Thanks for the feedback. Fordham or GW would be my preference, but it seems like I may be 50/50 there or get WL and maybe get in.

Would there be any benefit to trying to applying at either of these places for PT instead?

I wouldn't pay sticker at either of those places. GW PT recently got a lot harder to get into. Not sure about Fordham.

snapdragon · Post by **snapdragon** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:51 pm

Mizz wrote:Thanks for the feedback. Fordham or GW would be my preference, but it seems like I may be 50/50 there or get WL and maybe get in.

Would there be any benefit to trying to applying at either of these places for PT instead?

I don't have a hard science background, but I got into GW PT this cycle with a 3.1 / 167 and into Fordham PT off the waitlist.

Just so you know, WUSTL and UIUC were mostly not taking 167 splitters this year. 168+ was necessary (I got rejected at WUSTL, WLed at UIUC.)

PM me if you have any specific questions.. my LSN is the same as my username here.

* Forum

*

Re: 167/3.19 Science background Non-traditional Chances

Re: 167/3.19 sci background Non-trad best chances for BigLaw?

*

Re: 167/3.19 sci background Non-trad best chances for BigLaw?

Re: 167/3.19 sci background Non-trad best chances for BigLaw?

Register now to search topics and post comments!