Horrible undergrad track record Forum

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
twobrain

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:07 am

Horrible undergrad track record

Post by twobrain » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:11 am

What are my chances of getting into a decent school (Fordham, most likely parttime) with a 2.4 ungrad GPA? I did go to grad school where I ended up with a 3.6 GPA (CS undergrad, IS graduate).
What kind of score would I need to even have a shot at a decent school?

User avatar
FeelTheHeat

Platinum
Posts: 5178
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by FeelTheHeat » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:13 am

Unfortunately, its going to be REALLY tough. You would have to score a 170+ and spam the entire T1 and pray that you get accepted, let alone with $$$$.

User avatar
Flips88

Diamond
Posts: 15246
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by Flips88 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:14 am

FeelTheHeat wrote:Unfortunately, its going to be REALLY tough. You would have to score a 170+ and spam the entire T1 and pray that you get accepted, let alone with $$$$.
+1

or work for a significant enough amount of time to distance yourself from the grades and display maturity about taking work more seriously. But yeah, you're going to need a super high LSAT.

twobrain

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:07 am

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by twobrain » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:22 am

Flips88 wrote:
FeelTheHeat wrote:Unfortunately, its going to be REALLY tough. You would have to score a 170+ and spam the entire T1 and pray that you get accepted, let alone with $$$$.
+1

or work for a significant enough amount of time to distance yourself from the grades and display maturity about taking work more seriously. But yeah, you're going to need a super high LSAT.
Oops forgot to mention that I have been working for the past 5 years now.

User avatar
FeelTheHeat

Platinum
Posts: 5178
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by FeelTheHeat » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:23 am

172+, ED to NW.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Ty Webb

Silver
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by Ty Webb » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:23 am

FWIW, I got into a school ranked in the 50s with a 2.33/166.

User avatar
Justathought

Silver
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:16 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by Justathought » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:50 am

2.4/164/URM/non-trad with great work experience here. I got into most of the T2s I applied to, plus American and SMU. I'm also on a few t30 wait lists. I think it will be very difficult, even with urm status, to get into Fordham. I don't know if a 175 would cut it, but it probably would, since you have some distance from your GPA.

Your best bet would be to get at least a 168. That would probably do the trick for select splitter friendly schools like Indiana. 169 would probably net you a good chance at WUSTL. 172 and your best chance would be NW. None of these are a sure thing, but its possible if you put together a very good application.

User avatar
mountaintime

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:38 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by mountaintime » Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:57 am

172+: northwestern
168+: wustl
167+: illinois / minnesota
166+: emory / w&l
164+: gmu, indiana, maybe wake forest

some might be off by a point, and some may no longer be quite as splitter friendly as they were the past two cycles, but you get the idea

edit: I don't know if fordham is very splitter friendly

User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by red_alertz » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:27 pm

take testmasters

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


HWS08

Bronze
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:32 am

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by HWS08 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:30 pm

You should double check the LSAC website, but I *think* they combine your UG and grad GPAs when calculating your LSDAS GPA, which is what schools will look at. Their are calculators online you can use to figure it out, but your LSDAS GPA will be higher than your UG GPA. That might help you a little.

User avatar
Ty Webb

Silver
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by Ty Webb » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:30 pm

HWS08 wrote:You should double check the LSAC website, but I *think* they combine your UG and grad GPAs when calculating your LSDAS GPA, which is what schools will look at. Their are calculators online you can use to figure it out, but your LSDAS GPA will be higher than your UG GPA. That might help you a little.
No.

User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by red_alertz » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:43 pm

HWS08 wrote:You should double check the LSAC website, but I *think* they combine your UG and grad GPAs when calculating your LSDAS GPA, which is what schools will look at. Their are calculators online you can use to figure it out, but your LSDAS GPA will be higher than your UG GPA. That might help you a little.
quit trolling

User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:30 pm

mountaintime wrote:172+: northwestern
168+: wustl
167+: illinois / minnesota
166+: emory / w&l
164+: gmu, indiana, maybe wake forest

some might be off by a point, and some may no longer be quite as splitter friendly as they were the past two cycles, but you get the idea

edit: I don't know if fordham is very splitter friendly
169+: wustl
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
emory I don't know about the others but these were too low and emory won't really take any sub 3.0s. IUB might be up to 167 next year as well.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Verity

Silver
Posts: 1253
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by Verity » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:37 pm

JamMasterJ wrote: 169+: wustl
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
emory I don't know about the others but these were too low and emory won't really take any sub 3.0s. IUB might be up to 167 next year as well.

+1. This is accurate. Try to get a 180, though, you might get T14.

09042014

Diamond
Posts: 18203
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by 09042014 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:40 pm

Rock that LSAT Brah.

Some T2's will give a full ride for a 170. A bunch of T1's will give some money. SMU is pretty good about that.


This year, Ill and WUSTL were a little more grad conscious.

User avatar
dpk711

Silver
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by dpk711 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:41 pm

Verity wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote: 169+: wustl
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
emory I don't know about the others but these were too low and emory won't really take any sub 3.0s. IUB might be up to 167 next year as well.

+1. This is accurate. Try to get a 180, though, you might get T14.
I'm not quite sure if any T14 other than NU ED would take OP. Even with NU ED w/ crazy work experience, OP would be far away from a guaranteed acceptance. To be fair, 2.4 is a horrible GPA.

09042014

Diamond
Posts: 18203
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by 09042014 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:42 pm

dpk711 wrote:
Verity wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote: 169+: wustl
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
emory I don't know about the others but these were too low and emory won't really take any sub 3.0s. IUB might be up to 167 next year as well.

+1. This is accurate. Try to get a 180, though, you might get T14.
I'm not quite sure if any T14 other than NU ED would take OP. Even with NU ED w/ crazy work experience, OP would be far away from a guaranteed acceptance. To be fair, 2.4 is a horrible GPA.
Doesn't have to be crazy w/e. But you gotta rock the LSAT.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by red_alertz » Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:44 pm

2.4 isn't that bad

User avatar
Flips88

Diamond
Posts: 15246
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by Flips88 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:09 pm

red_alertz wrote:2.4 isn't that bad
A majority of Cs in pretty bad.

User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by red_alertz » Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:13 am

what do you do then? what's the general lsat u need to get into a decent school?

reverendt

Bronze
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:56 am

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by reverendt » Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:18 am

How long ago were the bad grades?
I got accepted across T2 with a 2.74 (the bad stuff was from 13 years prior, and I'd finally finished undergrad 1 year prior with straight As) and a 164.
You want to stress how you've grown/changed, etc., in an addendum.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by red_alertz » Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:14 pm

write an addendum and 2.4 is just fine, good enough for most T1 schools

User avatar
Flips88

Diamond
Posts: 15246
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by Flips88 » Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:23 pm

red_alertz wrote:write an addendum and 2.4 is just fine, good enough for most T1 schools
Goddamnit. Quit trolling.

User avatar
vanwinkle

Platinum
Posts: 8953
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by vanwinkle » Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:25 pm

Flips88 wrote:
red_alertz wrote:2.4 isn't that bad
A majority of Cs in pretty bad.
You never know, it could be a mix of A/Bs and D/Fs.

Trust me, it's happened.

User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: Horrible undergrad track record

Post by red_alertz » Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:36 pm

vanwinkle wrote:
Flips88 wrote:
red_alertz wrote:2.4 isn't that bad
A majority of Cs in pretty bad.
You never know, it could be a mix of A/Bs and D/Fs.

Trust me, it's happened.
yeah, i had a bunch of A/Bs, and bunch of Fs, ended up LSAC 2.47

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “What are my chances?”