Horrible undergrad track record Forum
-
twobrain

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:07 am
Horrible undergrad track record
What are my chances of getting into a decent school (Fordham, most likely parttime) with a 2.4 ungrad GPA? I did go to grad school where I ended up with a 3.6 GPA (CS undergrad, IS graduate).
What kind of score would I need to even have a shot at a decent school?
What kind of score would I need to even have a shot at a decent school?
- FeelTheHeat

- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
Unfortunately, its going to be REALLY tough. You would have to score a 170+ and spam the entire T1 and pray that you get accepted, let alone with $$$$.
- Flips88

- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
+1FeelTheHeat wrote:Unfortunately, its going to be REALLY tough. You would have to score a 170+ and spam the entire T1 and pray that you get accepted, let alone with $$$$.
or work for a significant enough amount of time to distance yourself from the grades and display maturity about taking work more seriously. But yeah, you're going to need a super high LSAT.
-
twobrain

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:07 am
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
Oops forgot to mention that I have been working for the past 5 years now.Flips88 wrote:+1FeelTheHeat wrote:Unfortunately, its going to be REALLY tough. You would have to score a 170+ and spam the entire T1 and pray that you get accepted, let alone with $$$$.
or work for a significant enough amount of time to distance yourself from the grades and display maturity about taking work more seriously. But yeah, you're going to need a super high LSAT.
- FeelTheHeat

- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
172+, ED to NW.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ty Webb

- Posts: 520
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
FWIW, I got into a school ranked in the 50s with a 2.33/166.
- Justathought

- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:16 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
2.4/164/URM/non-trad with great work experience here. I got into most of the T2s I applied to, plus American and SMU. I'm also on a few t30 wait lists. I think it will be very difficult, even with urm status, to get into Fordham. I don't know if a 175 would cut it, but it probably would, since you have some distance from your GPA.
Your best bet would be to get at least a 168. That would probably do the trick for select splitter friendly schools like Indiana. 169 would probably net you a good chance at WUSTL. 172 and your best chance would be NW. None of these are a sure thing, but its possible if you put together a very good application.
Your best bet would be to get at least a 168. That would probably do the trick for select splitter friendly schools like Indiana. 169 would probably net you a good chance at WUSTL. 172 and your best chance would be NW. None of these are a sure thing, but its possible if you put together a very good application.
- mountaintime

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:38 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
172+: northwestern
168+: wustl
167+: illinois / minnesota
166+: emory / w&l
164+: gmu, indiana, maybe wake forest
some might be off by a point, and some may no longer be quite as splitter friendly as they were the past two cycles, but you get the idea
edit: I don't know if fordham is very splitter friendly
168+: wustl
167+: illinois / minnesota
166+: emory / w&l
164+: gmu, indiana, maybe wake forest
some might be off by a point, and some may no longer be quite as splitter friendly as they were the past two cycles, but you get the idea
edit: I don't know if fordham is very splitter friendly
- red_alertz

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
take testmasters
-
HWS08

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:32 am
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
You should double check the LSAC website, but I *think* they combine your UG and grad GPAs when calculating your LSDAS GPA, which is what schools will look at. Their are calculators online you can use to figure it out, but your LSDAS GPA will be higher than your UG GPA. That might help you a little.
- Ty Webb

- Posts: 520
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
No.HWS08 wrote:You should double check the LSAC website, but I *think* they combine your UG and grad GPAs when calculating your LSDAS GPA, which is what schools will look at. Their are calculators online you can use to figure it out, but your LSDAS GPA will be higher than your UG GPA. That might help you a little.
- red_alertz

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
quit trollingHWS08 wrote:You should double check the LSAC website, but I *think* they combine your UG and grad GPAs when calculating your LSDAS GPA, which is what schools will look at. Their are calculators online you can use to figure it out, but your LSDAS GPA will be higher than your UG GPA. That might help you a little.
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
169+: wustlmountaintime wrote:172+: northwestern
168+: wustl
167+: illinois / minnesota
166+: emory / w&l
164+: gmu, indiana, maybe wake forest
some might be off by a point, and some may no longer be quite as splitter friendly as they were the past two cycles, but you get the idea
edit: I don't know if fordham is very splitter friendly
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Verity

- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:26 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
JamMasterJ wrote: 169+: wustl
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
emoryI don't know about the others but these were too low and emory won't really take any sub 3.0s. IUB might be up to 167 next year as well.
+1. This is accurate. Try to get a 180, though, you might get T14.
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
Rock that LSAT Brah.
Some T2's will give a full ride for a 170. A bunch of T1's will give some money. SMU is pretty good about that.
This year, Ill and WUSTL were a little more grad conscious.
Some T2's will give a full ride for a 170. A bunch of T1's will give some money. SMU is pretty good about that.
This year, Ill and WUSTL were a little more grad conscious.
- dpk711

- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
I'm not quite sure if any T14 other than NU ED would take OP. Even with NU ED w/ crazy work experience, OP would be far away from a guaranteed acceptance. To be fair, 2.4 is a horrible GPA.Verity wrote:JamMasterJ wrote: 169+: wustl
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
emoryI don't know about the others but these were too low and emory won't really take any sub 3.0s. IUB might be up to 167 next year as well.
+1. This is accurate. Try to get a 180, though, you might get T14.
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
Doesn't have to be crazy w/e. But you gotta rock the LSAT.dpk711 wrote:I'm not quite sure if any T14 other than NU ED would take OP. Even with NU ED w/ crazy work experience, OP would be far away from a guaranteed acceptance. To be fair, 2.4 is a horrible GPA.Verity wrote:JamMasterJ wrote: 169+: wustl
168+: illinois / minnesota
166+: indiana
emoryI don't know about the others but these were too low and emory won't really take any sub 3.0s. IUB might be up to 167 next year as well.
+1. This is accurate. Try to get a 180, though, you might get T14.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- red_alertz

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
2.4 isn't that bad
- Flips88

- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
A majority of Cs in pretty bad.red_alertz wrote:2.4 isn't that bad
- red_alertz

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
what do you do then? what's the general lsat u need to get into a decent school?
-
reverendt

- Posts: 499
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:56 am
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
How long ago were the bad grades?
I got accepted across T2 with a 2.74 (the bad stuff was from 13 years prior, and I'd finally finished undergrad 1 year prior with straight As) and a 164.
You want to stress how you've grown/changed, etc., in an addendum.
I got accepted across T2 with a 2.74 (the bad stuff was from 13 years prior, and I'd finally finished undergrad 1 year prior with straight As) and a 164.
You want to stress how you've grown/changed, etc., in an addendum.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- red_alertz

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
write an addendum and 2.4 is just fine, good enough for most T1 schools
- Flips88

- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
Goddamnit. Quit trolling.red_alertz wrote:write an addendum and 2.4 is just fine, good enough for most T1 schools
- vanwinkle

- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
You never know, it could be a mix of A/Bs and D/Fs.Flips88 wrote:A majority of Cs in pretty bad.red_alertz wrote:2.4 isn't that bad
Trust me, it's happened.
- red_alertz

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Horrible undergrad track record
yeah, i had a bunch of A/Bs, and bunch of Fs, ended up LSAC 2.47vanwinkle wrote:You never know, it could be a mix of A/Bs and D/Fs.Flips88 wrote:A majority of Cs in pretty bad.red_alertz wrote:2.4 isn't that bad
Trust me, it's happened.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login