ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low? Forum
- Schfifty Five
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:17 pm
ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
3.0 UGPA
170 LSAT
Pretty good softs.
What does it look like for me if I ED to SMU in the next cycle? I am worried that I may be shooting a little low. My dream would be Vandy, but I realize the futility of applying. Perhaps W&L or Texas?
Thanks.
170 LSAT
Pretty good softs.
What does it look like for me if I ED to SMU in the next cycle? I am worried that I may be shooting a little low. My dream would be Vandy, but I realize the futility of applying. Perhaps W&L or Texas?
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:08 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
That's shooting low for an ED
Do you want to work in Texas? You oughta try shooting an ED to UTA
Do you want to work in Texas? You oughta try shooting an ED to UTA
-
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Here's an idea: don't ED, apply widely, negotiate up a scholarship at SMU, profit.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
SMU ED non-binding.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
bhan87 wrote:That's shooting low for an ED
Do you want to work in Texas? You oughta try shooting an ED to UTA
Won't happen, UT has about a 3.5 floor.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Bumi wrote:negotiate up a scholarship at SMU
They don't negotiate.
-
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Wow, everything I said was wrong.
-
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
If ED is nonbinding, what the hell are you asking us for? Is there any reason not to do it?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Bumi wrote:Wow, everything I said was wrong.
Nope, the apply widely was a good idea. OP can apply to SMU ED (highly recommended since they are slower than an arthritic turtle on Quaalude's), and not be bound to go. But he's likely to get good money from them as they favor LSAT.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Indiana might offer you $120,000 scholarship over 3 years. Iowa is another law school to consider for scholarship money.
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
As much as I would love to disagree with Kalvano, this seems pretty accurate: http://texas.lawschoolnumbers.com/statskalvano wrote:bhan87 wrote:That's shooting low for an ED
Do you want to work in Texas? You oughta try shooting an ED to UTA
Won't happen, UT has about a 3.5 floor.
I would say more of a 3.4 non-urm floor, but the point stands.
No reason not to do ED at SMU, but definitely apply to some of the splitter friendly schools. As mentioned, Indiana would likely give you money, and Northwestern would consider you. By all means, still apply to Texas as well... you never know.
OP, are you focusing on the South? If so, that makes a difference. I would think Emory might be a good option for in that scenario.
ALSO: Why not take a flier at Vandy? It looks like they're mostly waitlisting people in your range. Why not put in a flyer on the outside chance you get WL --> A.
http://vanderbilt.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1011/
Last edited by danquayle on Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Schfifty Five
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
I had no idea ED to SMU was non-binding. I didnt want to be a dick and W them.
I will be working in Texas, but do not want to go to Baylor or Houston.
Anyone know anything on Tulane for TX?
I will be working in Texas, but do not want to go to Baylor or Houston.
Anyone know anything on Tulane for TX?
- Schfifty Five
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
danquayle wrote:As much as I would love to disagree with Kalvano, this seems pretty accurate: http://texas.lawschoolnumbers.com/statskalvano wrote:bhan87 wrote:That's shooting low for an ED
Do you want to work in Texas? You oughta try shooting an ED to UTA
Won't happen, UT has about a 3.5 floor.
I would say more of a 3.4 non-urm floor, but the point stands.
No reason not to do ED at SMU, but definitely apply to some of the splitter friendly schools. As mentioned, Indiana would likely give you money, and Northwestern would consider you. By all means, still apply to Texas as well... you never know.
OP, are you focusing on the South? If so, that makes a difference. I would think Emory might be a good option for in that scenario.
Yes, most definitely staying in the South. I've thought about Emory and UGA...but didnt really know how that would carry to TX.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
It claims 12% for Southwest. I'm guessing the bulk of that is in Texas. Given the proximity of Louisiana to Texas, that makes sense.Schfifty Five wrote:I had no idea ED to SMU was non-binding. I didnt want to be a dick and W them.
I will be working in Texas, but do not want to go to Baylor or Houston.
Anyone know anything on Tulane for TX?
I'd still look at Emory, though it looks to have limited reach to Texas. (Though a portion of this could be self-selection).
http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/care ... -11-10.pdf
All that being said, Texas is a strange beast in a lot of ways. The legal market is no exception. Texas has exceptional preference for its local law schools, so if you're dead set on Texas, I'd take SMU over Tulane and Emory. Not sure about Vanderbilt, but probably even over Vanderbilt.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Schfifty Five wrote:I had no idea ED to SMU was non-binding. I didnt want to be a dick and W them.
I will be working in Texas, but do not want to go to Baylor or Houston.
Anyone know anything on Tulane for TX?
SMU > Tulane for Texas, unless you are talking bordering on Louisiana.
- Schfifty Five
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
danquayle wrote:It claims 12% for Southwest. I'm guessing the bulk of that is in Texas. Given the proximity of Louisiana to Texas, that makes sense.Schfifty Five wrote:I had no idea ED to SMU was non-binding. I didnt want to be a dick and W them.
I will be working in Texas, but do not want to go to Baylor or Houston.
Anyone know anything on Tulane for TX?
I'd still look at Emory, though it looks to have limited reach to Texas. (Though a portion of this could be self-selection).
http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/care ... -11-10.pdf
All that being said, Texas is a strange beast in a lot of ways. The legal market is no exception. Texas has exceptional preference for its local law schools, so if you're dead set on Texas, I'd take SMU over Tulane and Emory. Not sure about Vanderbilt, but probably even over Vanderbilt.
Thanks for the quick response.
Thats the thing, I will be working in Texas, and most likely in the DFW area.
Even though I could shoot higher, I'm not sure that it would pay dividends in the long run. (On the assumption that I wouldnt have a chance to get into the T14...)
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Schfifty Five wrote:DFW area
Then go to SMU unless a T14 or Vanderbilt offers you good money.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
Yeah, I'm good with that. You could probably snag a few T1 full rides, but I don't think it'd do you any good in Texas. Maybe send something Northwestern's way. Outside of that, I'd look exclusively at SMU, Texas and Vanderbilt. Maybe send apps to Tulane and a few other Texas schools as safeties.kalvano wrote:Schfifty Five wrote:DFW area
Then go to SMU unless a T14 or Vanderbilt offers you good money.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
SMU gives amazing scholarships to splitters.
Apply ED if it isn't binding. But also apply to Gtown, northwestern and michigan.
Apply ED if it isn't binding. But also apply to Gtown, northwestern and michigan.
- fathergoose
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: ED to SMU 3.0/170...shooting high or low?
ThisDesert Fox wrote:SMU gives amazing scholarships to splitters.
Apply ED if it isn't binding. But also apply to Gtown, northwestern and michigan.
At SMU now with similar numbers got pretty good $$.
Shoot for something better but SMU is a pretty nice place to end up
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login