. Forum
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
If you know you want to be in Minneapolis, Minnesota wouldn't be a bad option.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
Best chance at top ten would be to ED at Michigan. I don't recommend it, though.
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: 3.8x 168
Last edited by rebexness on Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Malcolm8X
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:56 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
This. What are your goals?ndirish2010 wrote:If you know you want to be in Minneapolis, Minnesota wouldn't be a bad option.
- buckilaw
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:27 am
Re: 3.8x 168
An ED to Mich would be your best shot. However, an extra point or two on your LSAT would do wonders for your prospects.
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:18 am
Re: 3.8x 168
If it ends up being free tuition, yes. Though I must qualify: do you have a burning passion to be somewhere else, even if you think you'd be happy in the twin cities?handlesthetruth wrote: ...
would I be a fool to pay sticker at a top ten instead of going to Minnesota (which I presume will be free tuition based on lsn) if I think I'd be happy in the twin cities?
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
- BrianGriffintheDog
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:14 am
Re: 3.8x 168
I don't think you're GPA's the issue when it comes to Chicago...it's the LSAT. If it had been 2 points higher (i.e. 170), it sure would've increased your chances at Chicago significantly.
- Deuce
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:12 am
Re: 3.8x 168
This. I am pretty much your numbers twin and am retaking in fall. Sack up n do it. The worse that can happen is your highest LSAT is still a 168.BrianGriffintheDog wrote:I don't think you're GPA's the issue when it comes to Chicago...it's the LSAT. If it had been 2 points higher (i.e. 170), it sure would've increased your chances at Chicago significantly.
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
No.handlesthetruth wrote:Thanks everyone! Bumping with updated original post....
Any chance at uchi ed if I got my final gpa to 3.88?
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BrianGriffintheDog
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:14 am
Re: 3.8x 168
handlesthetruth wrote:Again, all input is appreciated guys.Deuce wrote:This. I am pretty much your numbers twin and am retaking in fall. Sack up n do it. The worse that can happen is your highest LSAT is still a 168.BrianGriffintheDog wrote:I don't think you're GPA's the issue when it comes to Chicago...it's the LSAT. If it had been 2 points higher (i.e. 170), it sure would've increased your chances at Chicago significantly.
As for the above:
This is kind of what I was thinking, that I should retake (I would do it in June) and worst case scenario my highest is still 168. This is probably sound advice given my PT average on my last 8 tests was about 171. (my last three were 175, 173, 175!haha) However, let's say I do drop and get like a 165. How much would this hurt, if at all?
Oh it will hurt alright. I don't want to sound penisy or anything, but if you drop to 165, you can say goodbye to t14. With that being said, however, if you got 168 on your first try and AND actually sit down and study, you shouldn't have any problem bringing it up 2 points. Did you have any legitimate excuses as to why you underperformed compared to your PT avg?
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
Lolwut no.BrianGriffintheDog wrote:handlesthetruth wrote:Again, all input is appreciated guys.Deuce wrote:This. I am pretty much your numbers twin and am retaking in fall. Sack up n do it. The worse that can happen is your highest LSAT is still a 168.BrianGriffintheDog wrote:I don't think you're GPA's the issue when it comes to Chicago...it's the LSAT. If it had been 2 points higher (i.e. 170), it sure would've increased your chances at Chicago significantly.
As for the above:
This is kind of what I was thinking, that I should retake (I would do it in June) and worst case scenario my highest is still 168. This is probably sound advice given my PT average on my last 8 tests was about 171. (my last three were 175, 173, 175!haha) However, let's say I do drop and get like a 165. How much would this hurt, if at all?
Oh it will hurt alright. I don't want to sound penisy or anything, but if you drop to 165, you can say goodbye to t14. With that being said, however, if you got 168 on your first try and AND actually sit down and study, you shouldn't have any problem bringing it up 2 points. Did you have any legitimate excuses as to why you underperformed compared to your PT avg?
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
It might hurt but it won't KILL your chances if you do lower.
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:36 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
Blanket T14. Please.
Your stats, more or less, similar to mine, and I've gotten into half of the T14's and waiting on five more.
Your stats, more or less, similar to mine, and I've gotten into half of the T14's and waiting on five more.
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
this might be the dumbest thing i've ever seen in the advice boards. dropping to 165 will have no effect. 168 will still be your highest score and will be the score that schools report/use to admit or deny you. if you want to you can always write some bullshit addendum that you were sick that day or something, if you REALLY do score lower, but there's a good chance you won't.BrianGriffintheDog wrote:handlesthetruth wrote:Again, all input is appreciated guys.Deuce wrote:This. I am pretty much your numbers twin and am retaking in fall. Sack up n do it. The worse that can happen is your highest LSAT is still a 168.BrianGriffintheDog wrote:I don't think you're GPA's the issue when it comes to Chicago...it's the LSAT. If it had been 2 points higher (i.e. 170), it sure would've increased your chances at Chicago significantly.
As for the above:
This is kind of what I was thinking, that I should retake (I would do it in June) and worst case scenario my highest is still 168. This is probably sound advice given my PT average on my last 8 tests was about 171. (my last three were 175, 173, 175!haha) However, let's say I do drop and get like a 165. How much would this hurt, if at all?
Oh it will hurt alright. I don't want to sound penisy or anything, but if you drop to 165, you can say goodbye to t14. With that being said, however, if you got 168 on your first try and AND actually sit down and study, you shouldn't have any problem bringing it up 2 points. Did you have any legitimate excuses as to why you underperformed compared to your PT avg?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:36 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
If Michigan is your clear first choice, ED. If not, consider other options.handlesthetruth wrote:paulinaporizkova wrote: this might be the dumbest thing i've ever seen in the advice boards. dropping to 165 will have no effect. 168 will still be your highest score and will be the score that schools report/use to admit or deny you. if you want to you can always write some bullshit addendum that you were sick that day or something, if you REALLY do score lower, but there's a good chance you won't.
Thanks for that..it really did scare me; i was leaning towards a retake but was momentarily scared out of it as a result of that post lol.
168 is about 2.5 points below my PT average but I would have the anomalous 164 during prep.
I think I am going to retake in June, though, and if it doesn't feel good just cancel. I really, really want to go to UMich.
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: 3.8x 168
Michigan is definitely possible for you with your 168 if you ED and put together a great application (research the school a lot before you apply and make your app as Michigan- centric as possible), but it would be more of a lock with a higher LSAT. People with your #s and lower get in ED on a regular basis.handlesthetruth wrote:paulinaporizkova wrote: this might be the dumbest thing i've ever seen in the advice boards. dropping to 165 will have no effect. 168 will still be your highest score and will be the score that schools report/use to admit or deny you. if you want to you can always write some bullshit addendum that you were sick that day or something, if you REALLY do score lower, but there's a good chance you won't.
Thanks for that..it really did scare me; i was leaning towards a retake but was momentarily scared out of it as a result of that post lol.
168 is about 2.5 points below my PT average but I would have the anomalous 164 during prep.
I think I am going to retake in June, though, and if it doesn't feel good just cancel. I really, really want to go to UMich.
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login