3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here? Forum
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
So my stats are 3.27, 162 (had a sickness in the family a few weeks before I took the test so I had a lot of trouble focusing), retook and got a 167. Non-URM.
I have a consistent upward GPA trend and the 3.27 also includes courses I took at a prestigious university when I was in high school through a summer program, which brought down my GPA slightly. I also have pretty good softs, with a couple internships focused on my area of interest (sports law) and a Congressional Internship. I was also a teaching assistant for a few semesters for a course within my major, along with being an active member of a couple student organizations.
My letters came from:
- the person I TAed for (excellent letter)
- a teacher who took the time to ask me questions for an hour before writing the letter
- a staffer from the Congressman's office
The best school I got into so far was Washington and Lee. I also had a group interview at Georgetown last night but I'm pretty sure I'm going to be waitlisted at best. I also applied to WUSTL, Illinois, Emory, BU, BC, GW, William and Mary, Fordham, along with some other safeties. Got WLed at Illinois this morning.
My question is, am I shooting too high hoping to get into at least a couple of those schools I listed?
Thanks, guys!
I have a consistent upward GPA trend and the 3.27 also includes courses I took at a prestigious university when I was in high school through a summer program, which brought down my GPA slightly. I also have pretty good softs, with a couple internships focused on my area of interest (sports law) and a Congressional Internship. I was also a teaching assistant for a few semesters for a course within my major, along with being an active member of a couple student organizations.
My letters came from:
- the person I TAed for (excellent letter)
- a teacher who took the time to ask me questions for an hour before writing the letter
- a staffer from the Congressman's office
The best school I got into so far was Washington and Lee. I also had a group interview at Georgetown last night but I'm pretty sure I'm going to be waitlisted at best. I also applied to WUSTL, Illinois, Emory, BU, BC, GW, William and Mary, Fordham, along with some other safeties. Got WLed at Illinois this morning.
My question is, am I shooting too high hoping to get into at least a couple of those schools I listed?
Thanks, guys!
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Can anyone help me out here? Also have a quick question on Emory - LSP gives me a weak consider but that goes contrary to what LSN has for last year's data. Am I a pretty good shot for Emory or is it weak?
- Shooter

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Dude, Emory will do almost anything (probably not sexual, but maybe) to get your LSAT score. I'd say your chances are quite good (although not auto-admit).
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Good for Emory, WUSTL, UIUClaw4vus wrote:Can anyone help me out here? Also have a quick question on Emory - LSP gives me a weak consider but that goes contrary to what LSN has for last year's data. Am I a pretty good shot for Emory or is it weak?
No go on BC, BU, W&M, GW. GPA too low.
Fordham is a smaaaaaaaaallll shot.
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Haha, thanks for making me laugh. Really, though? It's at their 75th percentile, so I wouldn't think they'd be THAT crazy about it.Shooter wrote:Dude, Emory will do almost anything (probably not sexual, but maybe) to get your LSAT score. I'd say your chances are quite good (although not auto-admit).
-
2011Law

- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
BC and W&M you're in. Illinois I think you're in, and the rest are kinda a coin toss I think. Only have slightly higher stats (3.37/168) and I'm applying to the same schools as targets.
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Already got WL at UIUC. Not looking good.rad law wrote:Good for Emory, WUSTL, UIUClaw4vus wrote:Can anyone help me out here? Also have a quick question on Emory - LSP gives me a weak consider but that goes contrary to what LSN has for last year's data. Am I a pretty good shot for Emory or is it weak?
No go on BC, BU, W&M, GW. GPA too low.
Fordham is a smaaaaaaaaallll shot.
-
2011Law

- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
You really don't think he'd get into BC?rad law wrote:Good for Emory, WUSTL, UIUClaw4vus wrote:Can anyone help me out here? Also have a quick question on Emory - LSP gives me a weak consider but that goes contrary to what LSN has for last year's data. Am I a pretty good shot for Emory or is it weak?
No go on BC, BU, W&M, GW. GPA too low.
Fordham is a smaaaaaaaaallll shot.
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Yeah, it's really unclear to me right now. Someone got in with a 3.31 167 on LSN (which is my GPA if you don't include my high school summer program) but they also went to a top 10 private school. Mine isn't so good. Not bad, but not so good.2011Law wrote:You really don't think he'd get into BC?rad law wrote:Good for Emory, WUSTL, UIUClaw4vus wrote:Can anyone help me out here? Also have a quick question on Emory - LSP gives me a weak consider but that goes contrary to what LSN has for last year's data. Am I a pretty good shot for Emory or is it weak?
No go on BC, BU, W&M, GW. GPA too low.
Fordham is a smaaaaaaaaallll shot.
- Shooter

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
All I know is that LSN shows them going NUTS for people with 166+. I mean your GPA is low, but these schools usually have no problem finding high GPAs. I think if you are willing to ride the WL, all of the schools you listed are possible.law4vus wrote:Haha, thanks for making me laugh. Really, though? It's at their 75th percentile, so I wouldn't think they'd be THAT crazy about it.Shooter wrote:Dude, Emory will do almost anything (probably not sexual, but maybe) to get your LSAT score. I'd say your chances are quite good (although not auto-admit).
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Yeah, obviously WL isn't what I'd like but with the grades, I figured that's what would happen. Thanks for the help!Shooter wrote:All I know is that LSN shows them going NUTS for people with 166+. I mean your GPA is low, but these schools usually have no problem finding high GPAs. I think if you are willing to ride the WL, all of the schools you listed are possible.law4vus wrote:Haha, thanks for making me laugh. Really, though? It's at their 75th percentile, so I wouldn't think they'd be THAT crazy about it.Shooter wrote:Dude, Emory will do almost anything (probably not sexual, but maybe) to get your LSAT score. I'd say your chances are quite good (although not auto-admit).
- jwrash

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
anyone with a 166+ who can breathe is in at Emory
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Good to know, lol. I guess I'll be on the lookout for WUSTL and Emory. The others I'll prob be dinged/WL.jwrash wrote:anyone with a 166+ who can breathe is in at Emory
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Eh maybe. GPA is low.2011Law wrote:You really don't think he'd get into BC?rad law wrote:Good for Emory, WUSTL, UIUClaw4vus wrote:Can anyone help me out here? Also have a quick question on Emory - LSP gives me a weak consider but that goes contrary to what LSN has for last year's data. Am I a pretty good shot for Emory or is it weak?
No go on BC, BU, W&M, GW. GPA too low.
Fordham is a smaaaaaaaaallll shot.
- patrickd139

- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Does OP have a 167 (title) or 162 (OP)?
- Patriot1208

- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
It's misleading, but read the first sentence, the 167 is a retake of the 162.patrickd139 wrote:Does OP have a 167 (title) or 162 (OP)?
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Yes, the 167 is a retake of 162. Got the old score a couple weeks after my sister was diagnosed with leukemia.
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
Also, does anyone think I should apply anywhere else in the 20-40 range or have I covered it well enough? Already in at W and L and Maryland.
-
TyrodTaylor

- Posts: 224
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 4:06 pm
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
You are in at W&M with money. My LSAT is the same as yours and my GPA is a little lower and I ahve gotten some pretty strong advice from Current WM law students that I should expect money from them. I talked to a guy at admissions the other day and I first mentioned my GPA, and then I mentioned my LSAT and his tone changed very quickly, he was interested.
- snapdragon

- Posts: 766
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:34 am
Re: 3.27, 167 - Am I kidding myself here?
I have pretty close numbers to you so I figured I'd give you my results thus far - I think you may get into 1 or 2 of those schools but certainly not all. I was WLed at UIUC and Fordham (PT), rejected from BC, didn't even bother with BU. I'm pending at W&M but since I submitted ages ago, I'm thinking that's a WL/denial (someone with my exact numbers did get in + $, but they were in-state which may make a difference. Or I just may come off as dreadful and smelly in my app). W&M does NOT seem to be a lock for these numbers, not by a long shot. I'm pending PT at GULC and GW, expecting a denial from GULC and WL from GW. I'm also pending at WUSTL. No clue what to expect there.law4vus wrote:
The best school I got into so far was Washington and Lee. I also had a group interview at Georgetown last night but I'm pretty sure I'm going to be waitlisted at best. I also applied to WUSTL, Illinois, Emory, BU, BC, GW, William and Mary, Fordham, along with some other safeties. Got WLed at Illinois this morning.
My question is, am I shooting too high hoping to get into at least a couple of those schools I listed?
Thanks, guys!
I don't mean to sound grim, these are just my experiences. I'm also in at W&L and a handful of other schools at this point. I think you will get into 1-2 of those schools but I really wouldn't anticipate getting into a lot of them. I hope for your sake that I'm wrong, but this what the trend seems to be for me and others in the lower GPA / 167 range. Best of luck to you.