3.65/ 169/174 Forum
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 2:50 am
3.65/ 169/174
I have strong softs (Thesis, independent legal research, legal clinic experience) at a T-20 ugrad. Non-URM, taking at least a year off to work before I send in my apps. HYS pretty much a pipe dream, but I REALLY like Michigan and Berkeley. Thoughts?
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 3.65/ 169/174
You will get into Michigan with some decent money too: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 9&t=142335
You will not get into Berkeley with that GPA, but thats okay because the Michigan option is better anyways.
You can have any of CCN with an ED i would imagine, and maybe NYU without it (i dont know how they view multiple LSAT's)
HYS dont look so good, but i would apply anyways lol
You will not get into Berkeley with that GPA, but thats okay because the Michigan option is better anyways.
You can have any of CCN with an ED i would imagine, and maybe NYU without it (i dont know how they view multiple LSAT's)
HYS dont look so good, but i would apply anyways lol
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 2:50 am
Re: 3.65/ 169/174
Thanks!
Also, would it mitigate my lower GPA if I transferred after Freshman year and have had a positive grade trend (with one minor exception) since then?
Also, would it mitigate my lower GPA if I transferred after Freshman year and have had a positive grade trend (with one minor exception) since then?
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: 3.65/ 169/174
Please don't quote this, I might be deleting this info soon.
I had similar numbers last year: 3.56 / 163, 166, 174. Not really any strong softs. Undergrad that no one has heard of and an MA.
My results:
Columbia- wl'd
Chicago- wl'd
NYU- wl'd
Berkeley- rejected
M-wl'd
V- accepted w/ 20k/yr
P- held, no why P written-->rejected
N- accepted
D- wl'd
MVP is always hard to predict, but if you get accepted you should have a good shot at some good money. You also should have a good shot at Chicago (esp with good undergrad and softs), NYU (depending on how they treat the 2 scores), and a decent shot at Columbia.
Good luck.
I had similar numbers last year: 3.56 / 163, 166, 174. Not really any strong softs. Undergrad that no one has heard of and an MA.
My results:
Columbia- wl'd
Chicago- wl'd
NYU- wl'd
Berkeley- rejected
M-wl'd
V- accepted w/ 20k/yr
P- held, no why P written-->rejected
N- accepted
D- wl'd
MVP is always hard to predict, but if you get accepted you should have a good shot at some good money. You also should have a good shot at Chicago (esp with good undergrad and softs), NYU (depending on how they treat the 2 scores), and a decent shot at Columbia.
Good luck.
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: 3.65/ 169/174
Not really. It's better than a stagnant GPA or a declining one, but upward trends are a marginal soft at best. I had a pretty drastic one from my second semester of sophomore year on and I don't think it had too much of an effect.xtacle01 wrote:Thanks!
Also, would it mitigate my lower GPA if I transferred after Freshman year and have had a positive grade trend (with one minor exception) since then?
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 3.65/ 169/174
They dont care, they care about what they can reportxtacle01 wrote:Thanks!
Also, would it mitigate my lower GPA if I transferred after Freshman year and have had a positive grade trend (with one minor exception) since then?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login