chances Forum
- JenDarby
- Posts: 17362
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am
chances
I went a little fee waiver crazy and applied to:
Cornell
UCLA
U Texas
USC
Washington U
U Illinois
BU
Notre Dame
U Iowa
BC
William & Mary
U Georgia
Fordham
George Mason
Lewis & Clark
Loyola LA
Should I throw in apps to anywhere else in hopes of $?
Cornell
UCLA
U Texas
USC
Washington U
U Illinois
BU
Notre Dame
U Iowa
BC
William & Mary
U Georgia
Fordham
George Mason
Lewis & Clark
Loyola LA
Should I throw in apps to anywhere else in hopes of $?
Last edited by JenDarby on Sun Apr 19, 2015 2:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
Last edited by im_blue on Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Cornell, UCLA, UT are hard to predict. Gut tells me UT is a ding since you're OOS. Maybe in at one of Cornell/UCLA and in at USC. Probably in everywhere else.
- PinkCow
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
You're applying to Lewis and Clark and NOT UW?
- JenDarby
- Posts: 17362
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
UW was one of the few schools from 14-50 not kind enough to give me a fee waiver, I suppose I could email them and request one. I'm currently living in the NW, and not extremely interested in staying here though, so Lewis & Clark was somewhat of a $12 whim.chip3341 wrote:You're applying to Lewis and Clark and NOT UW?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
- PinkCow
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
Yeah I'm not certain but I don't think UW gives fee waivers. Oh well, you've got a lot of other potential locks/good options on there.
- PinkCow
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
atresia wrote:Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
- JenDarby
- Posts: 17362
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
im_blue wrote:I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
Do you think I have any shot at money at GW?
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
No, but you'll definitely get in, and might be able to negotiate with possible $ offers from BU/BC/Fordham.JenDarby wrote:im_blue wrote:I would add:
GW
Minnesota
W&L
IUB
SMU
UGA
Cardozo
Do you think I have any shot at money at GW?
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
+1, Cardozo gives nearly full rides for those numbers.chip3341 wrote:atresia wrote:Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
- JenDarby
- Posts: 17362
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
She*chip3341 wrote:atresia wrote:Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

There is a lot of TLS hate for Cardozo it seems. I should probably throw this out there, I'm not biglaw or bust.
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: 3.58/168 and no geographic preferences
I'm sure you're legal job or bust, though.JenDarby wrote:She*chip3341 wrote:atresia wrote:Really? A 3.58/168 shouldn't apply there, IMO, under any conditions.im_blue wrote:I would add:
Cardozo
Why not?? Cardozo gives some great $$$$, and with his scores, he might get $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$![]()
There is a lot of TLS hate for Cardozo it seems. I should probably throw this out there, I'm not biglaw or bust.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login