169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA? Forum
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:29 pm
169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
I graduated from a lower ranked UC school with a 3.95. Wondering what my chance is at UCLA, Berkeley, similar schools.
Also, can anyone recommend a decent place where I might have a chance at a full-ride?
Oh, and I've got a disciplinary record from Freshmen year (marijuana twice, destruction of property once). My only soft is spending a year studying in Western Europe and speaking a foreign language.
So far I've only been accepted to Texas, but really, really want to go to UCLA/Berkeley.
Also, can anyone recommend a decent place where I might have a chance at a full-ride?
Oh, and I've got a disciplinary record from Freshmen year (marijuana twice, destruction of property once). My only soft is spending a year studying in Western Europe and speaking a foreign language.
So far I've only been accepted to Texas, but really, really want to go to UCLA/Berkeley.
Last edited by molomloch on Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:47 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:21 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA NON-URM - UCLA?
I have very similar numbers and have already received some offers. PM me for more info.
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
100% in at UCLA. Berk is probably a no go with weak softs.
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:29 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
I wish that were true Imblue, but I kinda doubt it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:54 am
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
I'd say In at UCLA with a shot at Boalt.
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
Why? You're almost certainly in at UCLA, likely with big $ too. Look how 3.85+/169 fared last year:molomloch wrote:I wish that were true Imblue, but I kinda doubt it.
http://ucla.lawschoolnumbers.com/applic ... ,8&type=jd
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:29 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?
Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through~

Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through~
- sophia.olive
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
shut up its fine.molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?![]()
Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through~
Put together a good app. U might be able to get full rides from the other UCs.
If you want a better shot at berk or stan join TFA or the peacecorp and retake the lsat at some time during.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:29 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
Nice leg-warmers.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
What posters?molomloch wrote:illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?
- DieAntwoord
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:17 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
Your criminal activity addendum sounds more like a good ps.
- DieAntwoord
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:17 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
Austin is great!molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?~![]()
Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through
And I know you were joking but I have never even seen a guy on a horse in texas.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
I suspect in at both UCLA and Boalt. Enjoy California.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:29 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
They weren't posters, they were like flyers related to the price of laundry detergent at the dormitory washroom...
I was drunk you see, but that wasn't part of my write-up. Just destruction of property / failure to identify myself. I didn't get any sanctions / etc for the incident as it was just stupid.
I was drunk you see, but that wasn't part of my write-up. Just destruction of property / failure to identify myself. I didn't get any sanctions / etc for the incident as it was just stupid.
- DieAntwoord
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:17 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
Isnt there a lot of restrictions on the type of detergent you can use in cali/ or is that dish soap. They pollute. Maybe you were just ahead of your time.molomloch wrote:They weren't posters, they were like flyers related to the price of laundry detergent at the dormitory washroom...
I was drunk you see, but that wasn't part of my write-up. Just destruction of property / failure to identify myself. I didn't get any sanctions / etc for the incident as it was just stupid.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:28 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
sophia.olive wrote:shut up its fine.molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?![]()
Still have no idea how i got into the U of T. While I'm stoked to have gotten into U of T, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to hang with the rodeo lovin', urban cowboy crowd over there in Texas. I'm a California boy through and through~
Put together a good app. U might be able to get full rides from the other UCs.
If you want a better shot at berk or stan join TFA or the peacecorp and retake the lsat at some time during.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
You're right. You're the first person to ever have to write an addendum explaining stupid things you did Freshman year. No one has ever had to do this before. Your very high GPA doesn't mean anything. Rethink law school.molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?![]()
- DieAntwoord
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:17 pm
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:29 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
Oh, I've rethought it many times. It's a rather foolish idea. What's your rock solid motivation / justification for applying to law school? "LSpleaseee", what a name..LSpleaseee wrote:You're right. You're the first person to ever have to write an addendum explaining stupid things you did Freshman year. No one has ever had to do this before. Your very high GPA doesn't mean anything. Rethink law school.molomloch wrote:Yeah, but how many of those kids had to write an addendum about smokin da herbals and illegally removing posters from an on-campus message board!?![]()
Or was that just an attempt to call me stupid? That's not very nice, now is it "LSpleaseee"?
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
It's called sarcasm dude.molomloch wrote: Oh, I've rethought it many times. It's a rather foolish idea. What's your rock solid motivation / justification for applying to law school? "LSpleaseee", what a name..
Or was that just an attempt to call me stupid? That's not very nice, now is it "LSpleaseee"?
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:29 pm
Re: 169/4.0 LSACGPA nonURM / Discip. Problems / No Softs - UCLA?
I got in at Georgetown.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login