3.7, 165 Forum
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:11 pm
3.7, 165
3.7 GPA, 165 on the LSAT, where should I apply?
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
Since you can't get into any truly national schools, where do you want to work?
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:00 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
How do you figure he cant get into any "truly national" schools? You are aware that his numbers are covered in Wash U's range, GW's range, Fordham, Emory, even a chance at Cornelle..
Why do people believe that LSAT is the only thing these schools look at? People get rejected with higher consistently.
Why do people believe that LSAT is the only thing these schools look at? People get rejected with higher consistently.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
He's looking at WL/rejects from all of those schools; look at LSN if you don't believe me. Plus none of those are national anyway. The question remains.Tullstone wrote:How do you figure he cant get into any "truly national" schools? You are aware that his numbers are covered in Wash U's range, GW's range, Fordham, Emory, even a chance at Cornelle..
Why do people believe that LSAT is the only thing these schools look at? People get rejected with higher consistently.
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: 3.7, 165
Cornell is the only, albeit just slightly, national school out of any of those. And OP has no chance at Cornell.Tullstone wrote:How do you figure he cant get into any "truly national" schools? You are aware that his numbers are covered in Wash U's range, GW's range, Fordham, Emory, even a chance at Cornelle..
Why do people believe that LSAT is the only thing these schools look at? People get rejected with higher consistently.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:00 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
I must be misunderstanding what a "national school" is... I dont see how a school in D.C. could be more "national", especially GW.
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: 3.7, 165
Well, it would seem the common understanding of what a "national school" is, would be a school that has good national reach. Meaning that from that school you have a good shot of getting a good job anywhere in the country. Outside of the t14 schools in the country, and arguably the t12, you are likely combined to the region that you went to school in. Therefore, when deciding on schools, someone with numbers like the OP should really be considering where he/she wants to work before deciding on what school to go to. Put it this way, WUSTL may have better job placement than Florida, but if you want to work in Florida you would be foolish to take WUSTL over Florida. But, if you can get into one of the top schools in the country, then it is usually worth taking the highest ranked school depending on the OP's career aspirations.Tullstone wrote:I must be misunderstanding what a "national school" is... I dont see how a school in D.C. could be more "national", especially GW.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
Hell, even T12 is regional to varying degrees.Patriot1208 wrote:Well, it would seem the common understanding of what a "national school" is, would be a school that has good national reach. Meaning that from that school you have a good shot of getting a good job anywhere in the country. Outside of the t14 schools in the country, and arguably the t12, you are likely combined to the region that you went to school in. Therefore, when deciding on schools, someone with numbers like the OP should really be considering where he/she wants to work before deciding on what school to go to. Put it this way, WUSTL may have better job placement than Florida, but if you want to work in Florida you would be foolish to take WUSTL over Florida.Tullstone wrote:I must be misunderstanding what a "national school" is... I dont see how a school in D.C. could be more "national", especially GW.
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:00 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: 3.7, 165
*facepalm*Tullstone wrote:This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:00 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
Im just saying...
If you're good, you're good. The school you go to is only part of the equation isn't it?
If you're good, you're good. The school you go to is only part of the equation isn't it?
Last edited by Tullstone on Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
You don't get it.Tullstone wrote:This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:00 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
You aren't convincing me.rad law wrote:You don't get it.Tullstone wrote:This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
National schools have enough prestige to trump regional schools. For example, Pitt is the top law school in SW PA. But a Harvard grad would have an easier time getting a good job in Pittsburgh than a Pitt grad. Make sense?Tullstone wrote:You aren't convincing me.rad law wrote:You don't get it.Tullstone wrote:This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: 3.7, 165
And to add on to that, it's not that you can't go to GW and get to cali. It's that it is unlikely. Even if you are a top grad you will find it hard to get an interview with a cali firm because there just aren't the sheer number of cali firms hiring from there because they have no reason to. Nothing is set in stone, but outside of the the top schools you have to be prepared to live where you went to school.HeavenWood wrote:National schools have enough prestige to trump regional schools. For example, Pitt is the top law school in SW PA. But a Harvard grad would have an easier time getting a good job in Pittsburgh than a Pitt grad. Make sense?Tullstone wrote:You aren't convincing me.rad law wrote:You don't get it.Tullstone wrote:This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
Here is a scenario.Tullstone wrote:You aren't convincing me.rad law wrote:You don't get it.Tullstone wrote:This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
Go to Yale - get a job basically anywhere in the country. Get prestigious jobs.
Go to GW - don't count on it being easy to get a job outside the eastern seaboard. Chances for prestigious jobs decidedly less than Yale.
Which one sounds better to you?
As to the bolded, by the time you are well established, you probably won't want to give up your clients by moving.
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:00 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
Thats more clear, thanks.rad law wrote:Here is a scenario.Tullstone wrote:You aren't convincing me.rad law wrote:You don't get it.Tullstone wrote:This is such an arbitrary category... everything is regional, and national to a certain extent. I don't see why someone would seek a "national school" and then move to a part of the country where they could have gone to "regional" school to get the same job. Why do people think that one is locked in to working at a certain place for the rest of their life simply because of where they go to school? Havent' you seen how many government officials who went to, for example, Oklahoma Law?
Go to Yale - get a job basically anywhere in the country. Get prestigious jobs.
Go to GW - don't count on it being easy to get a job outside the eastern seaboard. Chances for prestigious jobs decidedly less than Yale.
Which one sounds better to you?
As to the bolded, by the time you are well established, you probably won't want to give up your clients by moving.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
I had very similar numbers to you when I applied to law school. I had a 3.7/166. People with numbers like ours typically have very predictable cycles. We are usually out of the top 14, we have an outside chance at 15-18, we have a decent chance at 19-25, and are likely in everywhere else.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.7, 165
166 is way better that a 165. 165 is like a dead zone. Waaaay not as competitive for 15-18 and barely competitive for 19-25. 165 is barely better than the 164 that's needed to get into strong state schools like UGA/UNC.kams wrote:I had very similar numbers to you when I applied to law school. I had a 3.7/166. People with numbers like ours typically have very predictable cycles. We are usually out of the top 14, we have an outside chance at 15-18, we have a decent chance at 19-25, and are likely in everywhere else.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login