168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA Forum
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:30 am
168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA
I have a 3.2 GPA and a received a 168 on my LSATs. I graduated from SUNY Buffalo and am looking to head to law school fall of 2012. Does anyone have similar stats? I'm really set on Fordham but I'm also looking at New York Law, Buffalo, Villanova and Brooklyn. Any suggestions? Thank you!
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: 168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA
lawschoolpredictor.com
- blurbz
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:43 pm
Re: 168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA
Aim higher than you are. Take a look at my cycle for what might be possible. (But account for different geographic preferences.)
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:13 am
Re: 168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA
my first suggestion would be to remove New York Law from your list....add cardozo if you want to be in nyc...and maybe rutger for a bargain buy...you will get decent money from cardozo, brooklyn, and rutgers
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:20 pm
Re: 168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA
you will prob have a decent shot at FOrdham Part time.
Do not consider New York Law, Brooklyn Law or Cardozo. These are horrible horrible diploma mill law schools. Fordham is only average, but the other law schools on your list are just bad
Do not consider New York Law, Brooklyn Law or Cardozo. These are horrible horrible diploma mill law schools. Fordham is only average, but the other law schools on your list are just bad
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:32 pm
Re: 168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA
This person is right. But, even at Fordham, you must do really well to pay back your law school debt. The odds are stacked against you here.lawschool2014 wrote:you will prob have a decent shot at FOrdham Part time.
Do not consider New York Law, Brooklyn Law or Cardozo. These are horrible horrible diploma mill law schools. Fordham is only average, but the other law schools on your list are just bad
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: 168 LSAT and 3.2 GPA
Some of the advice advice so far has been horrible.
________________________
TCR is:
A retake may also be TCR, if you think you can do better. Another couple of points brings the bottom T14 into play.
LSP sucks, especially for splitters. I am getting really freakin' tired of people responding to "What are my chances?" threads with "LSP!!!!" LSP is not helpful for a 168/3.2, and it is nowhere near as helpful as LSN. OP, check out lawschoolnumbers.com to gauge your chances.CanadianWolf wrote:lawschoolpredictor.com
Do not go to Dozo, Brooklyn, or Rutgers. You have a 168 for Christ's sake.1Levening2013 wrote:my first suggestion would be to remove New York Law from your list....add cardozo if you want to be in nyc...and maybe rutger for a bargain buy...you will get decent money from cardozo, brooklyn, and rutgers
________________________
TCR is:
You have a shot at acceptances (and perhaps even money) from a number of ~T20 schools. Apply to UMN, UIUC, ND, GW, and WUSTL and you will likely get in with a little money from a few of these. Fordham FT is probably an uphill battle, but PT is possible. Dunno if the cost would be worth it though.blurbz wrote:Aim higher than you are.
A retake may also be TCR, if you think you can do better. Another couple of points brings the bottom T14 into play.