*deleted* Forum

nice-and-cool · Post by **nice-and-cool** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:49 am

Thank a lot, ppl.

casper13 · Post by **casper13** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:54 am

Take Illinois money and roll with it. You scores are too much up and down to predict success and plus a 4th LSAT will not be a good showing to schools.

03121202698008 · Post by **03121202698008** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:56 am

You can only take the LSAT 3 times in two years so retaking is probably out anyhow.

nice-and-cool · Post by **nice-and-cool** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:58 am

blowhard wrote:You can only take the LSAT 3 times in two years so retaking is probably out anyhow.

You can get a permission from a law school and take the test. One of my friends did it and took the fourth test.

sophia.olive · Post by **sophia.olive** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:03 am

they take the highest score only anyways.

03121202698008 · Post by **03121202698008** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:10 am

nice-and-cool wrote:
blowhard wrote:You can only take the LSAT 3 times in two years so retaking is probably out anyhow.
You can get a permission from a law school and take the test. One of my friends did it and took the fourth test.

Yes, but it looks terrible. Um, "Hello, I took the LSAT three times and my two highest score are nearly identical but I don't think it truly represents my ability." If anything, a much higher score would be taken as an outlier and non-representative.

Grizz · Post by **Grizz** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:35 am

Why didn't you apply to Vandy, Emory, WUSTL, etc.? The UVA, Cornell, Duke WLs are not surprising.

deleted Forum

deleted

Re: 167/161/166 and 3.8

Re: 167/161/166 and 3.8

Re: 167/161/166 and 3.8

Re: 167/161/166 and 3.8

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: 167/161/166 and 3.8

Re: 167/161/166 and 3.8

Register for access!