3.45, 164, 174 Forum

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
trudat15

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:57 pm

3.45, 164, 174

Post by trudat15 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:24 am

Got a 164 in Dec, 174 in June. 3.45 from Georgetown undergrad.

Shooting for t14. Thoughts?

Thanks

User avatar
IAFG

Platinum
Posts: 6641
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by IAFG » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:25 am

ED at your favorite CCN

User avatar
KibblesAndVick

Silver
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:29 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by KibblesAndVick » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:28 am

You should write an LSAT addendum explaining how [generic and unverifiable excuse X] resulted in your sub par performance on the first LSAT.

trudat15

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:57 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by trudat15 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:29 am

Relatively new here. CCN I assume you mean - Cornell, Chicago, Northwestern? So far I've only figured out HYS.

THanks

trudat15

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:57 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by trudat15 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:29 am

KibblesAndVick wrote:You should write an LSAT addendum explaining how [generic and unverifiable excuse X] resulted in your sub par performance on the first LSAT.
Definitely plan on doing that since the 164 is so low.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
IAFG

Platinum
Posts: 6641
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by IAFG » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:31 am

trudat15 wrote:Relatively new here. CCN I assume you mean - Cornell, Chicago, Northwestern? So far I've only figured out HYS.

THanks
lololol i wish

chicago nyu columbia

oppotomus

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:55 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by oppotomus » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:32 am

.
Last edited by oppotomus on Wed May 29, 2013 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

trudat15

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:57 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by trudat15 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:35 am

oppotomus wrote:CCN - Columbia, Chicago, NYU

Ahh, gotcha. Thanks. Would LOVE to attend any of those so def plan on ED to Columbia and applying to Chicago and NYU

lawls

Bronze
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:52 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by lawls » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:46 am

trudat15 wrote:
oppotomus wrote:CCN - Columbia, Chicago, NYU

Ahh, gotcha. Thanks. Would LOVE to attend any of those so def plan on ED to Columbia and applying to Chicago and NYU
You'll get at least one with that LSAT.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
IAFG

Platinum
Posts: 6641
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by IAFG » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:51 am

lawls wrote:
trudat15 wrote:
oppotomus wrote:CCN - Columbia, Chicago, NYU

Ahh, gotcha. Thanks. Would LOVE to attend any of those so def plan on ED to Columbia and applying to Chicago and NYU
You'll get at least one with that LSAT.
ehhh not necessarily. chicago and columbia are both fickle and NYU doesn't like retakes. i would ED chicago if i were him, or just apply broadly for $

trudat15

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:57 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by trudat15 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:06 pm

IAFG wrote:
lawls wrote:
trudat15 wrote:
oppotomus wrote:CCN - Columbia, Chicago, NYU

Ahh, gotcha. Thanks. Would LOVE to attend any of those so def plan on ED to Columbia and applying to Chicago and NYU
You'll get at least one with that LSAT.
ehhh not necessarily. chicago and columbia are both fickle and NYU doesn't like retakes. i would ED chicago if i were him, or just apply broadly for $
Do you think applying broadly RD would allow me to get $ from any of these schools? I thought I barely had a chance at them as it is (hence the ED).
I've heard NYU doesnt like retakes, which is why I was leaning towards Columbia, but do I have a better shot at Chicago (the reason you would ED Chicago if you were me?)
Thanks for any and all advice.

sven

Bronze
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:11 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by sven » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:15 pm

what? why doesn't nyu like retakes? i've never heard that before.

lawls

Bronze
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:52 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by lawls » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:18 pm

IAFG wrote:
lawls wrote:
trudat15 wrote:
oppotomus wrote:CCN - Columbia, Chicago, NYU

Ahh, gotcha. Thanks. Would LOVE to attend any of those so def plan on ED to Columbia and applying to Chicago and NYU
You'll get at least one with that LSAT.
ehhh not necessarily. chicago and columbia are both fickle and NYU doesn't like retakes. i would ED chicago if i were him, or just apply broadly for $
Yah you're right I looked at LSN and it isn't a lock that one will accept. A good chance, though, especially with an ED.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


trudat15

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:57 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by trudat15 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:46 pm

sven wrote:what? why doesn't nyu like retakes? i've never heard that before.
Just what people on here have been saying (plus they avg LSAT scores anyways)

User avatar
rx3r

Bronze
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by rx3r » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:54 pm

trudat15 wrote:
sven wrote:what? why doesn't nyu like retakes? i've never heard that before.
Just what people on here have been saying (plus they avg LSAT scores anyways)
NYU wrote:If I take the LSAT more than once, does the Committee see the higher score?

Yes, but they evaluate based on the average score in most cases. The Committee may take special circumstances into account. If a candidate can point out specific reasons why the Committee should consider an LSAT score aberrant, they should detail those reasons in an addendum to the personal statement.
http://www.law.nyu.edu/admissions/jdadm ... ndex.htm#7

sven

Bronze
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:11 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by sven » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:01 pm

I don't see how this means that they 'don't like retakes.' They simply average them unless given a reason not to. How is this any different from something like Columbia or Harvard? Do people with multiple scores do worse than their average would suggest at NYU?

User avatar
Stanford4Me

Platinum
Posts: 6240
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:23 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by Stanford4Me » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:03 pm

sven wrote:I don't see how this means that they 'don't like retakes.' They simply average them unless given a reason not to. How is this any different from something like Columbia or Harvard? Do people with multiple scores do worse than their average would suggest at NYU?
It's kind of a trend many people have seen over application cycles.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
rx3r

Bronze
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by rx3r » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:07 pm

Here are three retaker examples from the graph on LSN (http://nyu.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats):

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wjnahill/jd

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/chutzpah/jd

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/LieutKaffee/jd

They are little red dots in an otherwise green field.

sven

Bronze
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:11 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by sven » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:36 pm

rx3r wrote:Here are three retaker examples from the graph on LSN (http://nyu.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats):

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wjnahill/jd

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/chutzpah/jd

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/LieutKaffee/jd

They are little red dots in an otherwise green field.
chutzpah was already rejected by the time s/he retook the LSAT. NYU agreed to reconsider the rejection, but this was already in March.. LieutKaffee doesn't say anything about retaking the LSAT and his/her scores aren't exactly stellar for NYU anyway. The only one that seems shocking is wjnahill, but I'm sure there are plenty of examples of people getting in with 2 scores that would outweigh whatever doubts this would give a retaker.

User avatar
Richie Tenenbaum

Gold
Posts: 2118
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by Richie Tenenbaum » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:49 pm

GPA is a little low for Columbia. Decent shot at NYU and Chicago (by no means a lock though). Decent shot at money from MVP (mich, Virginia, Penn).

I had 3 takes this past cycle with one a 174 and a 3.55 and I was shutout of CCN (wl'd at all), wl at mich, held-->rejected at Penn and 20k/yr at UVA.

User avatar
holybartender

Bronze
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by holybartender » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:54 pm

I had a 3.42 and a 166 -> 175 and uh, it didn't go so well haha.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
rx3r

Bronze
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by rx3r » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:03 pm

sven wrote:
rx3r wrote:Here are three retaker examples from the graph on LSN (http://nyu.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats):

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wjnahill/jd

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/chutzpah/jd

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/LieutKaffee/jd

They are little red dots in an otherwise green field.
chutzpah was already rejected by the time s/he retook the LSAT. NYU agreed to reconsider the rejection, but this was already in March.. LieutKaffee doesn't say anything about retaking the LSAT and his/her scores aren't exactly stellar for NYU anyway. The only one that seems shocking is wjnahill, but I'm sure there are plenty of examples of people getting in with 2 scores that would outweigh whatever doubts this would give a retaker.
Look LieutKaffee up on TLS; he retook (I know him from our shared admission cycle).

I'm just trying to help you see a pattern. You can choose to ignore it. However, I feel like the majority of retakers that apply to NYU will have their scores averages from anecdotal evidence on LSN and TLS. Apply if you want, but I wouldn't waste an ED application w/ a retake. Btw, LieutKaffee was something like a 152 --> 172.

User avatar
IAFG

Platinum
Posts: 6641
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by IAFG » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:04 pm

rx3r wrote:
Look LieutKaffee up on TLS; he retook (I know him from our shared admission cycle).
LTK had an unusually shitty cycle

User avatar
rx3r

Bronze
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by rx3r » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:05 pm

IAFG wrote:
rx3r wrote:
Look LieutKaffee up on TLS; he retook (I know him from our shared admission cycle).
LTK had an unusually shitty cycle
Agreed.

User avatar
rx3r

Bronze
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: 3.45, 164, 174

Post by rx3r » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:09 pm

OK: here's a person w/ stats that seem similar to yours.

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/kap36

(It doesn't say retake in the profile, but it comes up when you search for retakes only on LSN)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “What are my chances?”