3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools? Forum
-
dcgbm

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:02 pm
3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
Hey TLS,
I took the LSAT and cancelled before, this time I got a 170. I have no real softs, only a few bland internships sprinkled in each summer. not a URM, attended a top 50 UG with a very typical pre-law major. Basically, on the sheer power of my numbers, at what point do you think I can confidently say "yeah, I'll probably still get an acceptance here"? I understand its a holistic approach, two applicants with the same numbers get different results at the same school, etc, but I got to think at some point a 3.6x/170 is a lock barring horrid rec letters (which won't happen) or serious character issues (not the case either). I took a look at LSP and it has USC as admit; do you think this accurate? USC is a higher ranked school than I thought. I'm safe at UC Davis, right? What about GW?
Also, What do you think my chances are at the top 7-14 range?
I took the LSAT and cancelled before, this time I got a 170. I have no real softs, only a few bland internships sprinkled in each summer. not a URM, attended a top 50 UG with a very typical pre-law major. Basically, on the sheer power of my numbers, at what point do you think I can confidently say "yeah, I'll probably still get an acceptance here"? I understand its a holistic approach, two applicants with the same numbers get different results at the same school, etc, but I got to think at some point a 3.6x/170 is a lock barring horrid rec letters (which won't happen) or serious character issues (not the case either). I took a look at LSP and it has USC as admit; do you think this accurate? USC is a higher ranked school than I thought. I'm safe at UC Davis, right? What about GW?
Also, What do you think my chances are at the top 7-14 range?
- JWicker10

- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:35 am
Re: 3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
I think you're pretty much safe completely outside t14. Within t14 it is going to make a little difference what your GPA actually is, a 3.60 isn't equal to a 3.69...and at a competitive school it can certainly make a difference in your results.
I think if you EDed to one MVP you'd have a pretty good shot. Granted I think your chances at MVP are decent without ED as well though. I also think you're golden at Cornell.
With your numbers I'd apply to basically CCN on down and just see what happens, granted CCN is a major stretch for you.
I think if you EDed to one MVP you'd have a pretty good shot. Granted I think your chances at MVP are decent without ED as well though. I also think you're golden at Cornell.
With your numbers I'd apply to basically CCN on down and just see what happens, granted CCN is a major stretch for you.
Last edited by JWicker10 on Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jks289

- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:42 pm
Re: 3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
There is no such thing as no softs. It is all in the phrasing. Reality: You interned at a company where they assigned you to pick up sandwiches, sort mail, and one time let you book restaurant reservations for a client? Resume: You interned at a XXX firm, coordinating office communications and client relationships. There is always some way to spin it.
-
willyj

- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: 3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
Why is Cornell the least competitive of the t14 to get into, yet still ranked as high as it is?JWicker10 wrote:I think you're pretty much safe completely outside t14. Within t14 it is going to make a little difference what your GPA actually is, a 3.60 isn't equal to a 3.69...and at a competitive school it can certainly make a difference in your results.
I think if you EDed to one MVP you'd have a pretty good shot. Granted I think your chances at MVP are decent without ED as well though. I also think you're golden at Cornell.
With your numbers I'd apply to basically CCN on down and just see what happens, granted CCN is a major stretch for you.
- JWicker10

- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:35 am
Re: 3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
Well of the t14 it is ranked at the bottom end at 13. As for rankings, there's a lot USNWR takes into account besides the competition for admissions. While how selective a school might be is obviously significant there are still other factors. You can google USNWR methodology to figure out how they weight rankings.willyj wrote:Why is Cornell the least competitive of the t14 to get into, yet still ranked as high as it is?JWicker10 wrote:I think you're pretty much safe completely outside t14. Within t14 it is going to make a little difference what your GPA actually is, a 3.60 isn't equal to a 3.69...and at a competitive school it can certainly make a difference in your results.
I think if you EDed to one MVP you'd have a pretty good shot. Granted I think your chances at MVP are decent without ED as well though. I also think you're golden at Cornell.
With your numbers I'd apply to basically CCN on down and just see what happens, granted CCN is a major stretch for you.
For Cornell imparticular, I would guess they're the least competitive largely because of their location. Although, Cornell did have the highest spike in apps received within the t14 I believe this past cycle.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: 3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
There is no universal "easiest" t14. For someone with a 3.0/170, UVA is. For someone with a 2.8/173 NU is, for someone with a 3.5/168 Cornell is etc etc.
-
dcgbm

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:02 pm
Re: 3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
thanks for the replies. so UCLA looks pretty good?
-
thechee

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:42 am
Re: 3.6x/170 no softs - what do you think about these schools?
With approximately the same numbers as you (plus a cancel and a 164 on my LSAC record), I ED'd at Chicago and was waitlisted. I was admitted everywhere else I applied, except for UVA, which also WL'd me. Within the T14 I was got into Penn ($40k), Berkeley, Michigan ($30k), Cornell, and Duke (55k).
Don't underestimate the power of a carefully crafted application, and applying early. I spent tons of time on my essays, and sent out my apps in late November (doing so earlier might have resulted in a UVA acceptance).
Don't underestimate the power of a carefully crafted application, and applying early. I spent tons of time on my essays, and sent out my apps in late November (doing so earlier might have resulted in a UVA acceptance).