Unusual Lsat splitter Forum
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:37 am
- jmaan
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:15 pm
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
whats ur cum?law88 wrote:I am an unsual Lsat splitter my gpa from freshman year were very low because, I did not have the proper studying habit.
my grades were
Freshman: 2.3,2.6
So
Junior:3.1, 3.9
Senior: 3.9, 3.9
I havent taken the lsat yet because I am applying for spring semester, however I have been testing in the 170+.
So my question is if I do score 170+ what schools do i Have a chance to get accepted. My dream school is Stanford obviously my chances are extremely low because of my cumulative GPA, however considering I have had strong grades the last two years, and that my work experience is solid ( I was an RA for 2 years). Any ideas
and u just need to get a really high lsat...lsat can make up a lot for a gpa but this depends on the gpa....ur not gonna get HYS with anything lower than 3.6 id think
edit: also ur not an unusual splitter
- fathergoose
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
You actually sound like a very usual splitter. "But I have an upward trend" is the mantra of splitters everywhere (as one I should know). Depending on the weighting your gpa is in the lowish 3s so HYS is out and you would need a truly splitter worthy LSAT to have a shot anywhere inside the t14 except maybe UVA ED or NU with a year or two work experience. Study your ass off and hope for the best.
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
Did you take your entire sophomore year pass/fail?law88 wrote:I am an unsual Lsat splitter my gpa from freshman year were very low because, I did not have the proper studying habit.
my grades were
Freshman: 2.3,2.6
So
Junior:3.1, 3.9
Senior: 3.9, 3.9
I havent taken the lsat yet because I am applying for spring semester, however I have been testing in the 170+.
So my question is if I do score 170+ what schools do i Have a chance to get accepted. My dream school is Stanford obviously my chances are extremely low because of my cumulative GPA, however considering I have had strong grades the last two years, and that my work experience is solid ( I was an RA for 2 years). Any ideas
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:37 am
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
I c
Last edited by law88 on Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Thomas Jefferson
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:32 pm
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
I can't tell if this is a flame or not because: (1) this about as typical a splitter story as they come (between ex-pre-med students, people who took a year to get in shape, etc. etc. etc., as someone else said, the upward trend is incredibly cliche for splitters--speaking as a weak splitter myself); (2) what do you mean you're applying for the spring semester? I've never heard of a school that admits people for the spring; and (3) this was OP's first post (not that that is bad thing, just makes it more likely that this is a flame).law88 wrote:I consider myself an unusual splitter because most splitter constantly get the same gpa throughout college, whereas i got 3.8 average the last 2 years in 300-400 level classes, and 2.7 the first 2 years in 100-200 level classes.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:37 am
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
dude i cam here to get answers, not to get insulted by the likes of you so piss off.
- RickyRoe
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:53 pm
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
Wrong. Many splitters, myself included, partied/pledged/fucked around freshmen year and beyond then tried to make up for it. You are far from unusual. Also, you are not a splitter if you have never take the LSAT.law88 wrote:I consider myself an unusual splitter because most splitter constantly get the same gpa throughout college, whereas i got 3.8 average the last 2 years in 300-400 level classes, and 2.7 the first 2 years in 100-200 level classes.
Your chances are not "extremely low" at Stanford, they are zero. You are going to have a tough time getting into any SoCal schools with your GPA (I'm assuming 3.1-3.2), so you better hope you test as well as you think.
I do think this was a flame based on the comment "my work experience is solid - I was an RA for 2 years". So, you got this job with a 2.7 GPA? Must not have been as prestigious as you make it out to be. Unless by RA you are referring to you being a "resident advisor", in which case this is definitely a flame.
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
gonna go out on a limb here and say that if you wrote papers like this, it wasn't your study habits...law88 wrote:I am an unsual Lsat splitter my gpa from freshman year were very low because, I did not have the proper studying habit.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:32 pm
Re: Unusual Lsat splitter
My hypothesis is that it's a drunk TLS'er who created an alt. I don't know why this would be a particularly amusing flame worth creating an alt over though.Bedsole wrote:gonna go out on a limb here and say that if you wrote papers like this, it wasn't your study habits...law88 wrote:I am an unsual Lsat splitter my gpa from freshman year were very low because, I did not have the proper studying habit.