3.97/169 Forum
-
OdiEtAmo

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:57 am
3.97/169
GPA 3.97 @ top non-ivy university
GPA 3.94 @ prestigious public policy master's program
One-year overseas research fellowship
4 years of work experience in think tank
LSAT: 169 (did not prepare as diligently as advocated on this forum, and so could prob score higher with more study; any advice on re-takes would be appreciated as well)
Mixed Russian/Asian heritage, so no URM status.
Applying during 2010/11 cycle to:
- Boalt
- Stanford
- USC
- UCLA
- Chicago
- Columbia
- NYU
- Harvard
- Duke
- UVA
- Georgetown
Ideally, I’d like to go to school on the West Coast so Sanford & Boalt are top choices.
Thanks in advance.
GPA 3.94 @ prestigious public policy master's program
One-year overseas research fellowship
4 years of work experience in think tank
LSAT: 169 (did not prepare as diligently as advocated on this forum, and so could prob score higher with more study; any advice on re-takes would be appreciated as well)
Mixed Russian/Asian heritage, so no URM status.
Applying during 2010/11 cycle to:
- Boalt
- Stanford
- USC
- UCLA
- Chicago
- Columbia
- NYU
- Harvard
- Duke
- UVA
- Georgetown
Ideally, I’d like to go to school on the West Coast so Sanford & Boalt are top choices.
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by OdiEtAmo on Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- GeePee

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: 3.97/169
Unless you want Harvard or maybe Columbia, I really like your chances at the other schools with your current credentials. 172 would probably leave you all set across the board.
- Sauer Grapes

- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am
Re: 3.97/169
- Boalt - in
- Stanford - w/l
- USC - in
- UCLA - in
- Chicago - w/l
- Columbia - w/l
- NYU - w/l
- Harvard - out
- Duke - in
- UVA - in
- Georgetown - in
retake and get a 170 and I feel more confident about being in at Duke and UVA. Get a 172 or higher and you are possible everywhere with that GPA.
- Stanford - w/l
- USC - in
- UCLA - in
- Chicago - w/l
- Columbia - w/l
- NYU - w/l
- Harvard - out
- Duke - in
- UVA - in
- Georgetown - in
retake and get a 170 and I feel more confident about being in at Duke and UVA. Get a 172 or higher and you are possible everywhere with that GPA.
- GeePee

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: 3.97/169
I think OP's chance of waitlist at U of C or NYU is near zero right now, to be honest.Sauer Grapes wrote:- Boalt - in
- Stanford - w/l
- USC - in
- UCLA - in
- Chicago - w/l
- Columbia - w/l
- NYU - w/l
- Harvard - out
- Duke - in
- UVA - in
- Georgetown - in
retake and get a 170 and I feel more confident about being in at Duke and UVA. Get a 172 or higher and you are possible everywhere with that GPA.
- Sauer Grapes

- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am
Re: 3.97/169
Meaning you think he is definitely in?GeePee wrote:I think OP's chance of waitlist at U of C or NYU is near zero right now, to be honest.Sauer Grapes wrote:- Boalt - in
- Stanford - w/l
- USC - in
- UCLA - in
- Chicago - w/l
- Columbia - w/l
- NYU - w/l
- Harvard - out
- Duke - in
- UVA - in
- Georgetown - in
retake and get a 170 and I feel more confident about being in at Duke and UVA. Get a 172 or higher and you are possible everywhere with that GPA.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
sven

- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:11 am
Re: 3.97/169
you're set at boalt and i'd put you at like 60 (in)- 40 (deny) at stanford. so honestly, unless you have time to study again, just apply and hope for the best. i have two friends that got into stanford with GPAs in the 3.9s and 169s on their LSATs. and their softs weren't any better than yours. oh, and one of those also applied to nyu got into that, too.
- GeePee

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: 3.97/169
Provided that OP is actually from a top UG (which Chicago weights fairly heavily) and knows how to write (which all schools weight heavily, yes.
- Sauer Grapes

- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am
Re: 3.97/169
Very well. I'd take your advice over mine, so I'll buy it.GeePee wrote:Provided that OP is actually from a top UG (which Chicago weights fairly heavily) and knows how to write (which all schools weight heavily, yes.
-
Kretzy

- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: 3.97/169
3.9+ and 168+ has been good for NYU provided you apply early; 3.9+, 169+ good for Chicago and (in a couple of cases) Columbia.
I'd say everything but Boalt, Stanford, Columbia and Harvard are better than 50%; and I'd be more surprised than not if you were shut out of all four of those with your current scores.
My numbers put us at almost identical percentages on lawschoolpredictor, and you can see how my cycle has gone on LSN. Get your apps in early.
I'd say everything but Boalt, Stanford, Columbia and Harvard are better than 50%; and I'd be more surprised than not if you were shut out of all four of those with your current scores.
My numbers put us at almost identical percentages on lawschoolpredictor, and you can see how my cycle has gone on LSN. Get your apps in early.
-
BenJ

- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: 3.97/169
I would strongly recommend a retake. Your numbers are great, but the difference between a 169/3.97 and a 170/3.97 is far larger than it should be in terms of admissions prospects. A 172 or 173 would make you as close to a lock at Harvard as is possible.
Otherwise, basically what others said.
Otherwise, basically what others said.
- theadw

- Posts: 128
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:05 pm
Re: 3.97/169
If you really want Stanford, it may be worth a retake. I applied with similar numbers (slightly lower GPA +170 LSAT), retook this February, scored significantly higher, and they let me in promptly after seeing the new score.
I was also flat-out rejected by Boalt (prior to receiving the second score), so be wary of thinking that you're an auto-admit there.
I was also flat-out rejected by Boalt (prior to receiving the second score), so be wary of thinking that you're an auto-admit there.
-
OdiEtAmo

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:57 am
Re: 3.97/169
Thanks everyone for the rapid responses. I suspected that a re-take might be needed for Stanford and form what i see here, I should prob sign up for the June or Oct test.
-
lakerfanimal

- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:22 am
Re: 3.97/169
Agree with everyone on the suggestion to re-take for Stanford.
- missvik218

- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am
Re: 3.97/169
Do it in June if there is nothing more pressing on your schedule. That way you can spend the summer writing essays, and like Kretzy said - get your apps out ASAP. You should be in good shape!OdiEtAmo wrote:Thanks everyone for the rapid responses. I suspected that a re-take might be needed for Stanford and form what i see here, I should prob sign up for the June or Oct test.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login