GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances) Forum
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:36 pm
GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
I know this is "top-law-schools" but what are the chances of attending any school with a GPA below 2.0?
Due to a serious health setback during undergrad I have a full year of Fs on my transcript, which bring my cumulative GPA below 1.9. Is there any chance a school will admit me with a well written addendum, and considering my reasonable LSAT score of 163? I'm not aiming for a top 100 school, but rather attending any school and potentially transferring within the top 100 would be my best bet. Is this even an option? I would rather not do another undergraduate degree, but would that be my only option?
I know its like asking for Skoda repair advice on a Bentley forum, but I appreciate the knowledge level of the forum when it comes to admission related advice. Thanks in advance.
Due to a serious health setback during undergrad I have a full year of Fs on my transcript, which bring my cumulative GPA below 1.9. Is there any chance a school will admit me with a well written addendum, and considering my reasonable LSAT score of 163? I'm not aiming for a top 100 school, but rather attending any school and potentially transferring within the top 100 would be my best bet. Is this even an option? I would rather not do another undergraduate degree, but would that be my only option?
I know its like asking for Skoda repair advice on a Bentley forum, but I appreciate the knowledge level of the forum when it comes to admission related advice. Thanks in advance.
- GoTribe1
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:58 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Your LSAT will definitely get you in somewhere. If schools had to report an averaged GPA of its students you might be SOL, but for all intents and purposes, your low GPA is hurting them only as much as somebody whose GPA is .01 below their 25%. So long as you have a good reason for it, which you do, and its not the result of complete incompetence, some school will bite.
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
I thought you couldn't graduate with below 2.0...
Anyways, your best bet is to apply to 20 or so schools and write an addendum explaining your situation. Your LSAT is definatly a big plus. You should be able to get in to some school for sure, it might not even have to be the worst school in the country.
Anyways, your best bet is to apply to 20 or so schools and write an addendum explaining your situation. Your LSAT is definatly a big plus. You should be able to get in to some school for sure, it might not even have to be the worst school in the country.
- reebtoor
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:14 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Do not count on transferring.
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
+1 Yes, thanks. I forgot to say that.reebtoor wrote:Do not count on transferring.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:36 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
That sounds promising.GoTribe1 wrote:Your LSAT will definitely get you in somewhere. If schools had to report an averaged GPA of its students you might be SOL, but for all intents and purposes, your low GPA is hurting them only as much as somebody whose GPA is .01 below their 25%. So long as you have a good reason for it, which you do, and its not the result of complete incompetence, some school will bite.
I wasn't initially allowed until I met with the dean. I explained my situation and after providing some medical documentation he approved my grad request. Would retaking to try and get a >170 be worth it?Ragged wrote:I thought you couldn't graduate with below 2.0...
Anyways, your best bet is to apply to 20 or so schools and write an addendum explaining your situation. Your LSAT is definatly a big plus. You should be able to get in to some school for sure, it might not even have to be the worst school in the country.
- Shot007
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:46 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Wow,
I think you should just apply to as much schools as possible, also look into which schools weigh the LSAT significantly more than the GPA
I think you should just apply to as much schools as possible, also look into which schools weigh the LSAT significantly more than the GPA
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Retaking for a 170+ is always worth it.bagosian wrote: Would retaking to try and get a >170 be worth it?
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:36 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
I'll see how the cycle goes. If nothing works out I'll retake in June to try and score a 170+.Ragged wrote:Retaking for a 170+ is always worth it.bagosian wrote: Would retaking to try and get a >170 be worth it?
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:56 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Try NYLS. Some Asst. Dean of Admissions made an ass of themselves by soliciting my 50yr stepfather to apply for one of the many still open spots in the class.

You might have to go prove yourself in the real world first.

You might have to go prove yourself in the real world first.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:36 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
How did that happen?erniesto wrote:Try NYLS. Some Asst. Dean of Admissions made an ass of themselves by soliciting my 50yr stepfather to apply for one of the many still open spots in the class.
You might have to go prove yourself in the real world first.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:07 am
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
LOL. Actually true?erniesto wrote:Try NYLS. Some Asst. Dean of Admissions made an ass of themselves by soliciting my 50yr stepfather to apply for one of the many still open spots in the class.
You might have to go prove yourself in the real world first.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:53 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Is it possible to do any sort of graduate level work to try to bump up your GPA? That > 2.0 will hurt you. Some school will bite, but if they do, there will be -0- money offered, and it will most probably be T3/T4 that may bite.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:36 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Would schools distinguish between the two? I was under the impression that schools focused on the cumulative UGPA for admission purposes.Miznitic wrote:Is it possible to do any sort of graduate level work to try to bump up your GPA? That > 2.0 will hurt you. Some school will bite, but if they do, there will be -0- money offered, and it will most probably be T3/T4 that may bite.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:07 am
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
don't almost all grad schools have a gpa requirement too?Miznitic wrote:Is it possible to do any sort of graduate level work to try to bump up your GPA? That > 2.0 will hurt you. Some school will bite, but if they do, there will be -0- money offered, and it will most probably be T3/T4 that may bite.
- rw2264
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:59 am
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
an addendum will help significantly, along with documentation of your illness. somewhere will take you. apply as early as possible. and maybe wait a few years and work first. anything to get yourself away from that GPA.
also, do not count on transferring.
also, do not count on transferring.
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:56 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
True story, happened on Monday at a "focus" aka sell-you-on-this-school admitted student event that I went to.roadkilllaw wrote:LOL. Actually true?erniesto wrote:Try NYLS. Some Asst. Dean of Admissions made an ass of themselves by soliciting my 50yr stepfather to apply for one of the many still open spots in the class.
You might have to go prove yourself in the real world first.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:07 am
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
if you retook the lsat, and got 170+ your cycle would be SO unpredictable as you'd be one of the most extreme splitters ever. I don't even think I could tell you where to start applying...
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Northwestern took a 2.1/171 ED this cycle...anything's possible.roadkilllaw wrote:if you retook the lsat, and got 170+ your cycle would be SO unpredictable as you'd be one of the most extreme splitters ever. I don't even think I could tell you where to start applying...
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
They do focus on cumulative UGPA for admissions. Only way a grad degree would help is by distancing yourself from the 1.9.bagosian wrote:Would schools distinguish between the two? I was under the impression that schools focused on the cumulative UGPA for admission purposes.Miznitic wrote:Is it possible to do any sort of graduate level work to try to bump up your GPA? That > 2.0 will hurt you. Some school will bite, but if they do, there will be -0- money offered, and it will most probably be T3/T4 that may bite.
I would say that if you think you can hit a 167+ on the LSAT then it is worth a retake. I think with a steller LSAT, addendum and early apps then you might have a shot at some schools that would be worth the $.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:36 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Which is more reliable in predicting admissions likelihood for extreme splitters, LSP or the official LSAC guide?
I have sent out 15 applications so far to a number of tier 3s, with absolutely no idea of who would even consider me or auto-ding me. LSP seems to have me as an automatic ding at pretty much every Top 100 school, so is it even worth sending out applications to lower top 100 schools that are within the region I would like to work in?
The official guide search is a bit more forgiving, with a number of schools I would love to attend showing an admissions likelihood range of (40-70%).
I have sent out 15 applications so far to a number of tier 3s, with absolutely no idea of who would even consider me or auto-ding me. LSP seems to have me as an automatic ding at pretty much every Top 100 school, so is it even worth sending out applications to lower top 100 schools that are within the region I would like to work in?
The official guide search is a bit more forgiving, with a number of schools I would love to attend showing an admissions likelihood range of (40-70%).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:07 am
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Apply to schools where you're well above their 75% LSAT. If you actually think you can get over 170 with a retake, this list of schools will be bigger and better schools will be included (T1). Look into schools with a low gpa median and high lsat median, these schools are more splitter friendly. Honestly, I don't think either LSP or LSAC is reliable for such extreme numbers, you'll just have to apply to as many schools as possible.bagosian wrote:Which is more reliable in predicting admissions likelihood for extreme splitters, LSP or the official LSAC guide?
I have sent out 15 applications so far to a number of tier 3s, with absolutely no idea of who would even consider me or auto-ding me. LSP seems to have me as an automatic ding at pretty much every Top 100 school, so is it even worth sending out applications to lower top 100 schools that are within the region I would like to work in?
The official guide search is a bit more forgiving, with a number of schools I would love to attend showing an admissions likelihood range of (40-70%).
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:47 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Community college courses count for LSAC GPA, too. If it bumps you up significantly, I might take a few (even if they're just online) to get the number up (though that's certainly more expensive than retaking the LSAT).
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:47 am
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
I thought once you graduate, any other undergrad classes don't count towards your LSAC gpa?
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:36 pm
Re: GPA below 2.0/LSAT 163 (extenuating circumstances)
Just to update, 2 rejections so far (one t4, one t100). Lots still pending. Unpredictable to say the least.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login