i didn't say according to some employers/recruiters, i am pointing out the tier system by US News where American is tier 1, just a simple fact, why do u get all worked up because of it? it' s not like it's an unusual fact or observation, it is listed here on TLS website. Pepperdine is listed because it is a great school that finally getting what it deserves, a Tier 1 recognition this yearmr.hands wrote:Go call some employers/recruiters and ask if they think American is in the same tier as Harvard and NYU. (Also, why the fuck did you include Pepperdine in there?)Jah'rakal wrote:Scotchandsoda wrote:Jah'rakal wrote:
i don't think that's what i said, i was just pointing out of the fact that American University is a tier 1 school, the same tier as HYS, NYU and Pepperdine. Is it not a fact ? at least according to US News Rankings?
Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168) Forum
- Jah'rakal

- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:06 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
- Jah'rakal

- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:06 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
dude, my LSAT was 53 percentile and my GPA in my school was like bottom 10 , so i think it's a rather large splitWily wrote:Bro, with no offense intended, you're not a splitter. You need to get your LSAT up at least 10 more points to talk about being a high LSAT/ low GPA candidate.Jah'rakal wrote:i thought we are here to show some positives for splitters, and all u guys do is bash me...
- Wily

- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:35 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Splitters have high LSATS, period. As in, at least >160, and >165 or >170 to really have a chance at decent schools.Jah'rakal wrote:dude, my LSAT was 53 percentile and my GPA in my school was like bottom 10 , so i think it's a rather large splitWily wrote:Bro, with no offense intended, you're not a splitter. You need to get your LSAT up at least 10 more points to talk about being a high LSAT/ low GPA candidate.Jah'rakal wrote:i thought we are here to show some positives for splitters, and all u guys do is bash me...
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Thanks, Wily, for the awesome news!
2.7/171 checking in
2.7/171 checking in
- Wily

- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:35 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
You'll do better than me (likely in at a T14). Those 3 points make a big differencealwayssunnyinfl wrote:Thanks, Wily, for the awesome news!
2.7/171 checking in
- Jah'rakal

- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:06 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?Wily wrote:Splitters have high LSATS, period. As in, at least >160, and >165 or >170 to really have a chance at decent schools.Jah'rakal wrote:dude, my LSAT was 53 percentile and my GPA in my school was like bottom 10 , so i think it's a rather large splitWily wrote:Bro, with no offense intended, you're not a splitter. You need to get your LSAT up at least 10 more points to talk about being a high LSAT/ low GPA candidate.Jah'rakal wrote:i thought we are here to show some positives for splitters, and all u guys do is bash me...
- catholicgirl

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:34 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
You didn't get into schools where you have a decent employment outcome. End of story.
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
For a split second I thought this was directed at OP and was about to get really mad.catholicgirl wrote:You didn't get into schools where you have a decent employment outcome. End of story.
Would someone just ban the troll already?
- splitsplat

- Posts: 607
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:25 am
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Jah'rakal wrote:i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?

- catholicgirl

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:34 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Of course not! I love me some Wilyalwayssunnyinfl wrote:For a split second I thought this was directed at OP and was about to get really mad.catholicgirl wrote:You didn't get into schools where you have a decent employment outcome. End of story.
Would someone just ban the troll already?
- westinghouse60

- Posts: 403
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:27 am
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Lololsplitsplat wrote:Jah'rakal wrote:i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?
But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
- TheThriller

- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
PM with specific infowestinghouse60 wrote:Lololsplitsplat wrote:Jah'rakal wrote:i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?
But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Seriously, PLEASE!MillerTheThriller wrote:PM with specific infowestinghouse60 wrote:Lololsplitsplat wrote:Jah'rakal wrote:i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?
But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
- shifty_eyed

- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:MillerTheThriller wrote:Seriously, PLEASE!westinghouse60 wrote:PM with specific infosplitsplat wrote:
But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
-
tehwetbandit

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:45 am
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Please PM me as well!MillerTheThriller wrote:PM with specific infowestinghouse60 wrote:Lololsplitsplat wrote:Jah'rakal wrote:i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?
But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
- splitsplat

- Posts: 607
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:25 am
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
175/3.4 is pretty mild as a splitter, and a world of difference from OP and other 'extreme' splitters on this site, nonetheless, congrats on Duke!westinghouse60 wrote:But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
- Scotchandsoda

- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:09 am
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
Dude, thats awesome! Congrats!westinghouse60 wrote:Lololsplitsplat wrote:Jah'rakal wrote:i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?
But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
Giving all us splitters some hope.
- smaug_

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:06 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
I should second this. GPA floors are falling and schools seem to be making exceptions. It now isn't unusual for a splitter to be admitted with money at a school that they wouldn't have had a shot at a couple of years ago.westinghouse60 wrote:
But to get back to the topic of the thread, I got in off the WL to a splitter unfriendly T14 with a GPA below their floor. My advice to future splitters is don't avoid applying to a school where you're below their GPA floor, as these floors may no longer hold true with the decline in apps.
-
TheZoid

- Posts: 416
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
No, it's not decent. You're a URM and drastically outperformed your numbers, which are atrocious; like Cooley/Barry/Ave Maria bad. Also, only 50% of LSAT takers go to law school, so you're LSAT is closer to bottom 3%. Are you a high GPA splitter now?Jah'rakal wrote:
i mean, i got in tier 1 and tier 2 schools, is that not decent?
-
elcee1987

- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 2:40 am
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
is anyone else laughing at this? I hope you're not bragging about that 53 percentile bud, cause that's LOW. I think that's what we're all shocked about here, is that a 152 is considered low to anyone else but you, apparently. I scored a 156 on a practice lsat before I even started studying for it. low LSAT/low GPA=low stats, not splitter. Still though, I'm glad you're getting in places with the URM status, makes me feel better about my options as a URM.Jah'rakal wrote:dude, my LSAT was 53 percentile and my GPA in my school was like bottom 10 , so i think it's a rather large splitWily wrote:Bro, with no offense intended, you're not a splitter. You need to get your LSAT up at least 10 more points to talk about being a high LSAT/ low GPA candidate.Jah'rakal wrote:i thought we are here to show some positives for splitters, and all u guys do is bash me...
- TheThriller

- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
bump for that PM.
- Nova

- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
If yall havent run into this splitter thread, it is pretty good: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=188960
Looks like splitters who get serious typically do well
Looks like splitters who get serious typically do well
- Smumps

- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Some hope for splitters - my cycle (2.7/168)
This seemed to be a great year for splitters, no doubt due to falling law school applications. However, that doesn't mean you should just expect more acceptances. Submit a fantastic application, be diligent about LOCI's, and be ready to ride out waitlists, and you should do great.
I'm not a huge splitter (3.5/171), but I managed to snag one of CCN, three of MVPB, and all of DCNG (all with scholarship minus one). Initial LSN/LSP told me to expect one or two bites in the t-14.
Happy to help with anyone's upcoming cycle. Splitters are high stress!
I'm not a huge splitter (3.5/171), but I managed to snag one of CCN, three of MVPB, and all of DCNG (all with scholarship minus one). Initial LSN/LSP told me to expect one or two bites in the t-14.
Happy to help with anyone's upcoming cycle. Splitters are high stress!