It makes a huge differenceak45 wrote:Thanks a ton for all the responses. I didn't know about iilj, seems like a very interesting opportunity. To clarify, I have zero interest in big law, and am currently torn between government and international law. Also, i grew up in both chicago and new york (though primarily chicago) and have ties in both places.
Now I thought this was the most prestige-obsessed profession around. Does being in the top 5 (or 6) really not make that much of a difference in terms of employment prospects, particularly in non-big law scenarios?
171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5 Forum
- landshoes
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:17 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
I disagree, especially once you're outside of HYS. Staying in the T-14 is a good idea, but the differences within the T-14 are pretty small.landshoes wrote:It makes a huge differenceak45 wrote:Thanks a ton for all the responses. I didn't know about iilj, seems like a very interesting opportunity. To clarify, I have zero interest in big law, and am currently torn between government and international law. Also, i grew up in both chicago and new york (though primarily chicago) and have ties in both places.
Now I thought this was the most prestige-obsessed profession around. Does being in the top 5 (or 6) really not make that much of a difference in terms of employment prospects, particularly in non-big law scenarios?
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:07 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
Differences within the T14 are substantial and important. Certain schools carry more prestige and are better at placing in particular markets.Tiago Splitter wrote:I disagree, especially once you're outside of HYS. Staying in the T-14 is a good idea, but the differences within the T-14 are pretty small.landshoes wrote:It makes a huge differenceak45 wrote:Thanks a ton for all the responses. I didn't know about iilj, seems like a very interesting opportunity. To clarify, I have zero interest in big law, and am currently torn between government and international law. Also, i grew up in both chicago and new york (though primarily chicago) and have ties in both places.
Now I thought this was the most prestige-obsessed profession around. Does being in the top 5 (or 6) really not make that much of a difference in terms of employment prospects, particularly in non-big law scenarios?
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
Sure, but the OP's career goals are "not big law, government and international." OP does not have the GPA for HYS. I was responding to a post that said being in the top 5 (or 6) makes a huge difference. In a vacuum it does not for those goals, again assuming that HYS is out. I'm certainly not convinced that Columbia is necessarily a better choice than UVA or GULC for someone who just wants to work in DC doing not-biglaw things.UpandDown97 wrote: Differences within the T14 are substantial and important. Certain schools carry more prestige and are better at placing in particular markets.
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:07 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
More or less agree with you. Geographic proximity and relative value of a degree in a particular market is what matters there- so Columbia might be better since its still relatively close (no plane needed to get to DC), but UVA and Gtown would probably be equivalent. But it'd be dumb to go to anywhere not on the east coast probably.Tiago Splitter wrote:Sure, but the OP's career goals are "not big law, government and international." OP does not have the GPA for HYS. I was responding to a post that said being in the top 5 (or 6) makes a huge difference. In a vacuum it does not for those goals, again assuming that HYS is out. I'm certainly not convinced that Columbia is necessarily a better choice than UVA or GULC for someone who just wants to work in DC doing not-biglaw things.UpandDown97 wrote: Differences within the T14 are substantial and important. Certain schools carry more prestige and are better at placing in particular markets.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- landshoes
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:17 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
Also TBH top 5 doesn't seem like a thing considering NYU is a good spot for PI
0L though
0L though
-
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
I know I'm just one data point but with a 171 and <3.4, I was accepted off the waitlist from Penn, NYU, and Chicago this cycle (did not submit LOCIs). Seems like you might have a similar shot.
ETA I did not apply to Columbia.
ETA I did not apply to Columbia.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
I'd say penn ED is your best bet. Second would be NYU
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2015 5:32 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
Interesting-did you have really strong softs and do you think that may have played a role?secadc11 wrote:I know I'm just one data point but with a 171 and <3.4, I was accepted off the waitlist from Penn, NYU, and Chicago this cycle (did not submit LOCIs). Seems like you might have a similar shot.
ETA I did not apply to Columbia.
- kevgogators
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 11:34 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
ak45 wrote:Thanks a ton for all the responses. I didn't know about iilj, seems like a very interesting opportunity. To clarify, I have zero interest in big law, and am currently torn between government and international law. Also, i grew up in both chicago and new york (though primarily chicago) and have ties in both places.
Now I thought this was the most prestige-obsessed profession around. Does being in the top 5 (or 6) really not make that much of a difference in terms of employment prospects, particularly in non-big law scenarios?
Pretty sure few people give a fuck between say CLS and Penn cause one is a "T5". Except the laypeople, maybe.
Check out law school transparency...Columbia & Cornell, for example, have similar employment scores rn
-
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
I'd say I have pretty strong softs, but not Olympic athlete strong. Feel free to PM if you want more info.ak45 wrote:Interesting-did you have really strong softs and do you think that may have played a role?secadc11 wrote:I know I'm just one data point but with a 171 and <3.4, I was accepted off the waitlist from Penn, NYU, and Chicago this cycle (did not submit LOCIs). Seems like you might have a similar shot.
ETA I did not apply to Columbia.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
Eh. If we're talking about employment, opportunity, risk, ect., there's a bigger gap between chicago/columbia and some T14s, or between yale and harvard, than there is between chicago ect. and harvard. If we're talking about an abstract "prestige" untied to outcomes and opportunity, well, I stopped caring.Tiago Splitter wrote:I disagree, especially once you're outside of HYS. Staying in the T-14 is a good idea, but the differences within the T-14 are pretty small.landshoes wrote:It makes a huge differenceak45 wrote:Thanks a ton for all the responses. I didn't know about iilj, seems like a very interesting opportunity. To clarify, I have zero interest in big law, and am currently torn between government and international law. Also, i grew up in both chicago and new york (though primarily chicago) and have ties in both places.
Now I thought this was the most prestige-obsessed profession around. Does being in the top 5 (or 6) really not make that much of a difference in terms of employment prospects, particularly in non-big law scenarios?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:57 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
jesus fucking christ. we get it. your parents went to harvard but you couldn't get in, so now you shit on HLS every fucking chance you get. check your inferiority complex and give it a rest would you.jbagelboy wrote:Eh. If we're talking about employment, opportunity, risk, ect., there's a bigger gap between chicago/columbia and some T14s, or between yale and harvard, than there is between chicago ect. and harvard. If we're talking about an abstract "prestige" untied to outcomes and opportunity, well, I stopped caring.Tiago Splitter wrote:I disagree, especially once you're outside of HYS. Staying in the T-14 is a good idea, but the differences within the T-14 are pretty small.landshoes wrote:It makes a huge differenceak45 wrote:Thanks a ton for all the responses. I didn't know about iilj, seems like a very interesting opportunity. To clarify, I have zero interest in big law, and am currently torn between government and international law. Also, i grew up in both chicago and new york (though primarily chicago) and have ties in both places.
Now I thought this was the most prestige-obsessed profession around. Does being in the top 5 (or 6) really not make that much of a difference in terms of employment prospects, particularly in non-big law scenarios?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
The fact that you created a new account to make a single post in a months old thread to contrive inaccurate personal information about a stranger on the internet suggests to me you're a very stable, happy person whose errant opinions should be given great weight.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:09 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
and how many months is that? less than one?jbagelboy wrote:months-old thread
you've mentioned multiple times that your parents went to grad school at harvard. you had a below median lsat, below 25% gpa, and shit softs. you realized that the application fee would be a waste of money, so you didn't bother applying. it doesn't take a detective to put two and two together.inaccurate personal information
yeah, one that fills up TLS with his bullshit. case in point: how you feel, after two years of law school, fully qualified to talk about relative "employment, opportunity, risk, ect." [sic] between schools ranging from lower T14s to chicago to yale to harvard.stranger on the internet
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:54 pm
Re: 171, 3.45 trying to sneak into top 5
Man, you need to chill out.tls2718 wrote:and how many months is that? less than one?jbagelboy wrote:months-old thread
you've mentioned multiple times that your parents went to grad school at harvard. you had a below median lsat, below 25% gpa, and shit softs. you realized that the application fee would be a waste of money, so you didn't bother applying. it doesn't take a detective to put two and two together.inaccurate personal information
yeah, one that fills up TLS with his bullshit. case in point: how you feel, after two years of law school, fully qualified to talk about relative "employment, opportunity, risk, ect." [sic] between schools ranging from lower T14s to chicago to yale to harvard.stranger on the internet
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login