3.3 169 URM Forum
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
- LSATneurotic
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: 3.3 169 URM
you get the boost, man. don't look too much into this one result.canadianbrother wrote:Guess I'm not getting the boost. Applied duke PT and got priority reserved.
I probably got the PT because I checked the black/aa box and my numbers, but when they actually look at my app maybe the international part fucked me over. That or it's cause I didn't write a why duke.
- LSATneurotic
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: 3.3 169 URM
ETA: if you check mylsn, you will see that Duke is one of the anomalies as far as t-14 admissions go for AA males: they tend to waitlist quite a few of the higher scoring AA males. Like I said, don't sweat it, bro.LSATneurotic wrote:you get the boost, man. don't look too much into this one result.canadianbrother wrote:Guess I'm not getting the boost. Applied duke PT and got priority reserved.
I probably got the PT because I checked the black/aa box and my numbers, but when they actually look at my app maybe the international part fucked me over. That or it's cause I didn't write a why duke.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
Re: 3.3 169 URM
^ come on, no way duke is gonna yp me lol
- LSATneurotic
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: 3.3 169 URM
once again, check mylsn.info and plug in your numbers. You will see that they YP a large number of black applicants with numbers in our range. I am done consoling you.canadianbrother wrote:^ come on, no way duke is gonna yp me lol
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:45 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
Throw an app at Hahhvard.
So number twins can see how you do
So number twins can see how you do
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
Why would internationals get a URM boost??
Don't you have to be a underrepresented minority of the US (ie African American, Mexican American)
Don't you have to be a underrepresented minority of the US (ie African American, Mexican American)
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
I don't know if this is a serious question or notjames.bungles wrote:Why would internationals get a URM boost??
Don't you have to be a underrepresented minority of the US (ie African American, Mexican American)
but if you think really hard
you can probably figure out the answer yourself
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
I'm not saying they're not "underrepresented" in reality, I'm saying for law school admissions wouldn't they be just counted as international students and not as part of the AA/MA/NA quota?runinthefront wrote:I don't know if this is a serious question or notjames.bungles wrote:Why would internationals get a URM boost??
Don't you have to be a underrepresented minority of the US (ie African American, Mexican American)
but if you think really hard
you can probably figure out the answer yourself
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
I'm re-reading my post and I was kind of a jerk anyway, so my bad.james.bungles wrote:I'm not saying they're not "underrepresented" in reality, I'm saying for law school admissions wouldn't they be just counted as international students and not as part of the AA/MA/NA quota?runinthefront wrote:I don't know if this is a serious question or notjames.bungles wrote:Why would internationals get a URM boost??
Don't you have to be a underrepresented minority of the US (ie African American, Mexican American)
but if you think really hard
you can probably figure out the answer yourself
There are no racial quotas per se.
The legal justification for schools giving boosts to minority applicants is to increase diversity. International URM students bring 2x the purported diversity than that of ORM intenational students (hypothetically).
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
In theory yes, but I was under the impression that there were still de facto quotas, which is why only African Americans, Mexican Americans, Native Americans, and PR Americans get a boost for being URM. Being international in and of itself definitely does not give any sort of boost because of diversity (in fact it is usually a negative because they have no GPA to contribute),
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
The only boost I think you would get is from writing a compelling PS/DS, not from being international or international URMcanadianbrother wrote:Yes, but on ABA reports, I wouldn't even fall under Black, I'd fall under Non-resident alien. I should receive some boost atleast just because Im still brining diversity.
From mylsn, my numbers would get me in Mich, Cornell, GULC without any boost since im at or above their 75ths and my LSAT is still at least median at all the other lower t14s.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
Why do you think law schools really provide de facto quotas (without divulging into an affirmative action thread). If it's because of the lack of racial diversity in the legal workplace, I don't think that the national origin of the black or mexican student matters.james.bungles wrote:In theory yes, but I was under the impression that there were still de facto quotas, which is why only African Americans, Mexican Americans, Native Americans, and PR Americans get a boost for being URM. Being international in and of itself definitely does not give any sort of boost because of diversity (in fact it is usually a negative because they have no GPA to contribute),
I feel like you understand why schools give boosts to international URMs, but you're just uncomfortable with it
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: 3.3 169 URM
Don't let Duke mess with your head. Duke is weird with URM admissions; Ive seen so much weird shit on LSN with them. With that being said, it's hard to know if international blacks still get the same boost.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
I thought from the data (LSN and TLS applicants) internationals urms didn't get a boostruninthefront wrote:Why do you think law schools really provide de facto quotas (without divulging into an affirmative action thread). If it's because of the lack of racial diversity in the legal workplace, I don't think that the national origin of the black or mexican student matters.james.bungles wrote:In theory yes, but I was under the impression that there were still de facto quotas, which is why only African Americans, Mexican Americans, Native Americans, and PR Americans get a boost for being URM. Being international in and of itself definitely does not give any sort of boost because of diversity (in fact it is usually a negative because they have no GPA to contribute),
I feel like you understand why schools give boosts to international URMs, but you're just uncomfortable with it
I don't give a shit why they do what they do I'm just trying to establish the facts
Last edited by Mack.Hambleton on Sat Nov 08, 2014 2:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
nah you're definitely wrongjames.bungles wrote:I thought from the data (LSN and TLS applicants) internationals urms didn't get a boostruninthefront wrote:Why do you think law schools really provide de facto quotas (without divulging into an affirmative action thread). If it's because of the lack of racial diversity in the legal workplace, I don't think that the national origin of the black or mexican student matters.james.bungles wrote:In theory yes, but I was under the impression that there were still de facto quotas, which is why only African Americans, Mexican Americans, Native Americans, and PR Americans get a boost for being URM. Being international in and of itself definitely does not give any sort of boost because of diversity (in fact it is usually a negative because they have no GPA to contribute),
I feel like you understand why schools give boosts to international URMs, but you're just uncomfortable with it
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
This is from the stickied "Am I a URM thread"
You need to be either a US citizen or a permanent resident to receive URM boost. International students are not considered a part of US population for AA purposes (or for tax or many other purposes, for that matter).
You need to be either a US citizen or a permanent resident to receive URM boost. International students are not considered a part of US population for AA purposes (or for tax or many other purposes, for that matter).
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
unless that links to some relevant case law im missingjames.bungles wrote:This is from the stickied "Am I a URM thread"
You need to be either a US citizen or a permanent resident to receive URM boost. International students are not considered a part of US population for AA purposes (or for tax or many other purposes, for that matter).
i unequivocally disagree
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: 3.3 169 URM
wtf are u talking about case lawruninthefront wrote:unless that links to some relevant case law im missingjames.bungles wrote:This is from the stickied "Am I a URM thread"
You need to be either a US citizen or a permanent resident to receive URM boost. International students are not considered a part of US population for AA purposes (or for tax or many other purposes, for that matter).
i unequivocally disagree
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login