I have a strong suspicion that you might not have adequately thought about what a career in law actually entails… All the same, best wishes!DaRascal wrote:Discovery and briefing sound boring. I just want to study an interesting kinda law.

I have a strong suspicion that you might not have adequately thought about what a career in law actually entails… All the same, best wishes!DaRascal wrote:Discovery and briefing sound boring. I just want to study an interesting kinda law.
Yes of course. It's your sixth administration of the LSAT that will make them think you're crazy. Not the fourth or fifth. Or your extensive C&F. Or the sociopathic reddit-stylized dribble that will inevitably lace your personal statement. No, you're totally right taking the test again would push an otherwise upstanding candidate over the edge.DaRascal wrote:bagelboy, I'm going to look like a psycho if I take the LSAT a 6th time. Schools will think I'm crazy.
Well looks like my safeties will be Iowa, Wake Forest, Indiana, and Illinois. If I strike out at the lower T14, which seems like it's going to happen, then I'll let you guys know where I end up going to!
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I just want to see what it's all about. I've invested too much time and money into it to go back now.pancakes3 wrote:I'm sure this has been asked many times, many places, and in many tongues but... why do you want to go to law school?
lolwut. I think you're thinking of that time when I joked about cursing in my writing sample of my LSAT and some people thought the word I used was a racial slur when it was really just a variant of the **bleep** word.PeanutsNJam wrote:the real question here is why does anybody believe a word DaRascal says. He could be the fucking Harvard dean of admissions, fucking with people here. He posted in the sept waiters thread once asking if it's okay to say overtly racist things in his PS or something. Y'all are gullible as fuck
I'm gonna stick with my fantasy that you're a YLS 3L, who just fucks with people on TLS out of boredom because classes are too easy for you. Otherwise, I may lose all faith in humanity.DaRascal wrote:lolwut. I think you're thinking of that time when I joked about cursing in my writing sample of my LSAT and some people thought the word I used was a racial slur when it was really just a variant of the **bleep** word.PeanutsNJam wrote:the real question here is why does anybody believe a word DaRascal says. He could be the fucking Harvard dean of admissions, fucking with people here. He posted in the sept waiters thread once asking if it's okay to say overtly racist things in his PS or something. Y'all are gullible as fuck
Nope. I'm 100% real! PM me for proof, baby!
I have some good news and some bad news.DaRascal wrote:Doesn't help that I burned that Notre Dame bridge because of that cocky e-mail I sent them when I was intoxicated a few weeks back. Think they'll remember me if I reapply there?
EricHosmer wrote: I have some good news and some bad news.
The good news is that Notre Dame viewed that email as an indication of your fieriness and determination.
The bad news is that they blacklisted you and contacted all T14 schools to tell them not to admit you.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
He's playing the long con then, because I remember him on TLS from when I took the LSAT in 2011.PeanutsNJam wrote:the real question here is why does anybody believe a word DaRascal says. He could be the fucking Harvard dean of admissions, fucking with people here. He posted in the sept waiters thread once asking if it's okay to say overtly racist things in his PS or something. Y'all are gullible as fuck
You go, girl.DaRascal wrote:I actually wasn't joking about that one haha. I was so confident that I had broken 165 this time that I got on the liquid courage train one night and sent an e-mail to them telling them that I wasn't a fan of their games and that I'd show them what they missed out on!
guinness1547 wrote: He's playing the long con then, because I remember him on TLS from when I took the LSAT in 2011.
Solid chance you'll be saying this again once you graduate law school.DaRascal wrote:I 'm in desperate need of a time machine. I seriously need a redo on these past 3 years.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Law school will be difffffffferent...Wingtip88 wrote:Solid chance you'll be saying this again once you graduate law school.DaRascal wrote:I 'm in desperate need of a time machine. I seriously need a redo on these past 3 years.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I estimated your GPA range. I was generous. As a URM, your Michigan ED chances aren't terrible. Don't interview at NW though I can only imagine that'd hurt you.DaRascal wrote:We definitely have to let this thread go, but, before we do, could you guys just give me a final chances outlook (In, WL/In, WL/Out, Out)? I just submitted my last app and this is my last time applying to law school and, I'm disappointed in myself, but I'd like to know where the TLS community thinks I stand in terms of admissions chances (refer back to the OP if you have to)
Michigan (ED)
Berkeley
Duke
Northwestern (will interview)
Cornell
Iowa
Indiana
Illinois
Colorado
Wake Forest
Seton Hall
Thanks, everyone for all the advice! Be well!
It's a function of TLS being so huge. There are always fresh cons who aren't familiar with the troll that can be drawn in.dabigchina wrote:i don't understand why people constantly feed this obvious troll
TheSpanishMain wrote:It's a function of TLS being so huge. There are always fresh cons who aren't familiar with the troll that can be drawn in.dabigchina wrote:i don't understand why people constantly feed this obvious troll
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login