Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
This. A Hamilton is quite literally the most difficult thing to get in the entire law school admissions process. Getting one means you're among the few dozen most qualified applicants in the whole process. In terms of selectivity, it's a bit like asking how to get a SCOTUS clerkship. It's good to have high aspirations--a Hamilton is, in my opinion, the best possible outcome an applicant can get absent significant need aid at Yale--but don't be disappointed to fall short of a ridiculously lofty standard.
This conversation has totally gone off on a tangent and people are debating options I don't even have lol, but I agree with the above. I do, however, think you can determine that, say, a 150 is not gonna cut it, and a 180/4/URM/olympic gold medalist with no disciplinary history makes it probable.
I won't be able to help being disappointed if I don't get it, because it's my ideal outcome, but I definitely wouldn't feel like a failure.
JamMasterJ wrote:people need to realize that Hamilton/Ruby and whatever are rare scholarships. There's no such thing as stats that would "secure" it. You would have a great shot with a 174, but that by no means that you could ever truly have it on lock
I agree that nothing would "secure" it, but I really just needed to decide if a 168 would make it possible, and it seems to me that it's pretty far-fetched at less than 172. I've already decided to retake.