2.95/171 - Georgetown ED next cycle? Forum

[Dany]

i feel betrayed

[paulinaporizkova]

I'd do UVa ED then UMich ED then GULC FT/PT ED in succession. (Assuming no work experience.)

this. start with the better schools and work your way down - you can probably get UVA/Mich/NU with that LSAT, which all offer better job prospects than GULC

edit: NU with work experience. will you be taking at least a year off from UG? if so, i'd go with NU ED. amazing firm placement stats, badass big city.

You're being too generous. No chance I get Michigan or UVa OOS. I feel like GULC is my best bet...especially if I interview and tell the dean I'll attend if admitted (giving up all my leverage, I guess, but getting me into a t14).

actually no, i'm not. look at panda's example from above. also whoever else said that apps are somewhat holistic for #s around yours is right - for example, panda got into UVA with similar #s as fatduck, but fatduck did not (boo.) if you ask for advice and then turn around and say the advice is bad, don't ask for it in the first place.

edit: this is entirely conditional on a 170 score, so....why am i still posting in this thread?

[Marionberry]

FWIW, I'm in at GULC ED full time with a 171, 3.0. I do not know of any non-urms who have gotten in this cycle with less than a 3.0

And as others have pointed out I don't think any of these school accept imaginary LSAT scores, so this thread is pointless.

[ClaytonR]

i feel betrayed

Weird...no one seemed to have any problem giving "hypo" advice ITT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 9&t=146875

[fatduck]

i feel betrayed

Weird...no one seemed to have any problem giving "hypo" advice ITT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 9&t=146875

hypotheticals are frowned upon in general but they are 100x worse when you don't disclose up-front that they're hypothetical

[ClaytonR]

i feel betrayed

Weird...no one seemed to have any problem giving "hypo" advice ITT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 9&t=146875

hypotheticals are frowned upon in general but they are 100x worse when you don't disclose up-front that they're hypothetical

They're not worse at all, really. For some reason people feel "betrayed".

IMAGINE IF YOU NEVER EVEN KNEW.

[fatduck]

They're not worse at all, really. For some reason people feel "betrayed".

IMAGINE IF YOU NEVER EVEN KNEW.

yea good point i don't know anyone who dislikes being lied to