If I had a 3.5 after 1L and a 170 on my 3rd LSAT, 160 on the Forum

krad · Post by **krad** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:16 pm

chip3341 wrote:
jblev2 wrote:no urm and i havent started law school yet, was starting in fall then thinking of transferring, going to start somewhere mediocre, or maybe at a decent tier 2 school

I sense trouble on your horizons.

kkklick · Post by **kkklick** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:02 pm

megaTTTron wrote:in before the storm.

gambelda · Post by **gambelda** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:24 pm

kkklick wrote:
megaTTTron wrote:in before the storm.

Are we still pre-storm? If so, count me in.

James Bond · Post by **James Bond** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:26 pm

There is no storm approaching. BrownBears09 is just a massive tool.

northwood · Post by **northwood** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:17 pm

then we shall re name him Kobalt

If I had a 3.5 after 1L and a 170 on my 3rd LSAT, 160 on the Forum

Re: If I had a 3.5 after 1L and a 170 on my 3rd LSAT, 160 on the

Re: If I had a 3.5 after 1L and a 170 on my 3rd LSAT, 160 on the

Re: If I had a 3.5 after 1L and a 170 on my 3rd LSAT, 160 on the

Re: If I had a 3.5 after 1L and a 170 on my 3rd LSAT, 160 on the

Re: If I had a 3.5 after 1L and a 170 on my 3rd LSAT, 160 on the

Register now to search topics and post comments!