3.48/180 Forum

[bk1]

What gave you the impression that I don't understand it?

Oh, I don't know...misspelling the phrase initially set me off. Then you're lack of coherent argument as to what the problem with the term is. Maybe you should spend less time telling people who have better numbers than you which schools they won't get into and more time reading law books. Good luck!

QFirony

[paratactical]

Man, you are just hell bent on being a jerk, aren't you?

Aw, you can make fun of people with graphic art but your feelings get hurt when someone points out that you're not very clever? I know, put me on one your lists that you make for people who hurt your feelings.

Yeah, I'm totally butthurt that you don't like me.

It wasn't in the econ or the philosophy class I took.

That could explain why you can't put together a coherent argument--you were doing graphic design during those classes!

Yes, memes clearly require graphic design practice.

[NDPhil]

Yes, memes clearly require graphic design practice.

Great rebuttal. But...where's the graphic???

[romothesavior]

Yes, memes clearly require graphic design practice.

--ImageRemoved--

[paratactical]

Yes, memes clearly require graphic design practice.

--ImageRemoved--

[NDPhil]

QFirony

This only works when there's irony, my friend. Have you done your Google search yet?

[NDPhil]

Yes, memes clearly require graphic design practice.

--ImageRemoved--

Brilliant! You've clearly given the more persuasive argument!

[beachbum]

It's not like getting a high GPA or LSAT requires enjoying outside philosophical reading all that much.

Then you confirm the suspicion that high GPA's and LSAT's really don't say much about intelligence.

You're right, knowledge of a single Latin term completely overshadows the quantitative value of a 170+ LSAT and a 3.5+ GPA. Yup, seems legit to me.

[d34d9823]

Dude, what the hell? We were having a pointless but amusing argument about douchiness, so you decided to ruin it by illustrating the concept?

[NDPhil]

You're right, knowledge of a single Latin term completely overshadows the quantitative value of a 170+ LSAT and a 3.5+ GPA. Yup, seems legit to me.

Yes! That clearly follows from what I said! You are a tribute to legal thinking.

[paratactical]

Dude, what the hell? We were having a pointless but amusing argument about douchiness, so you decided to ruin it by illustrating the concept?

Dude, we're clearly too dumb for him. He's getting a PhD.

[bk1]

QFirony

This only works when there's irony, my friend. Have you done your Google search yet?

Thanks for the suggestion!

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=your+vs+you're

[bk1]

Dude, what the hell? We were having a pointless but amusing argument about douchiness, so you decided to ruin it by illustrating the concept?

He's helping the visual learners out there.

[romothesavior]

I think it is hilarious that anyone would use one's knowledge of Latin terminology as a proxy for ANYTHING, much less intelligence. Hell, most lawyers don't even use Latin all that often.

[d34d9823]

I think it is hilarious that anyone would use one's knowledge of Latin terminology as a proxy for ANYTHING, much less intelligence. Hell, most lawyers don't even use Latin all that often.

An appropriate place for this: Rome, ~250 BC.

[beachbum]

You're right, knowledge of a single Latin term completely overshadows the quantitative value of a 170+ LSAT and a 3.5+ GPA. Yup, seems legit to me.

Yes! That clearly follows from what I said! You are a tribute to legal thinking.

Have you read your argument? Yes, it does follow from what you said.

[Grizz]

You're right, knowledge of a single Latin term completely overshadows the quantitative value of a 170+ LSAT and a 3.5+ GPA. Yup, seems legit to me.

Yes! That clearly follows from what I said! You are a tribute to legal thinking.

--ImageRemoved--

[d34d9823]

--ImageRemoved--