looks like if you have a 3.6 or higher GPA, or a 167 or higher LSAT, we have a chance... then again it can be a mass waitlist so yea...ticklememauve wrote: Not me, I'm a reverse splitter (stats in profile) with a multitude of softs and strong LORs and PS. Third update on 3/23; no e-mail today.
For WUSTL Applicants Forum
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I am going to will my 2.7/170 all the way to an acceptance tomorrow. I think if I focus really hard on it, I can do it.finalaspects wrote:looks like if you have a 3.6 or higher GPA, or a 167 or higher LSAT, we have a chance... then again it can be a mass waitlist so yea...ticklememauve wrote: Not me, I'm a reverse splitter (stats in profile) with a multitude of softs and strong LORs and PS. Third update on 3/23; no e-mail today.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:34 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
And WTH is my status checker still saying "Application Complete 3/19" when I already got the ding email?
- chicoalto0649
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:34 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Also, anyone wanna wager on whether or not this will be the last round of rejections?
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I believe it is. The only question left is: is anybody else going to be accepted before April 1? I have a feeling the answer is no.chicoalto0649 wrote:Also, anyone wanna wager on whether or not this will be the last round of rejections?
Last edited by Andrew the Wolverine on Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:03 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I'm an optimist, so I'll say that it's the last one until they finish accepting people.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
or finish waitlisting people.Unknownsou wrote:I'm an optimist, so I'll say that it's the last one until they finish accepting people.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:47 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Next question: Are all the 3/23 completes that didn't receive a ding email also URMs?
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:37 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
How can this be the last round of rejections. i really doubt it.Andrew the Wolverine wrote:I believe it is. The only question left is: is anybody else going to be accepted before April 1? I have a feeling the answer is no.chicoalto0649 wrote:Also, anyone wanna wager on whether or not this will be the last round of rejections?
- ticklememauve
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:12 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Nope, I'm not a URM.wizoz wrote:Next question: Are all the 3/23 completes that didn't receive a ding email also URMs?
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I'm a 3/10er who's a URM who didn't receive the ding today, if that counts.wizoz wrote:Next question: Are all the 3/23 completes that didn't receive a ding email also URMs?
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:47 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Andrew will fret like mad otherwise...please let him be optimistic !itsmytime10 wrote:How can this be the last round of rejections. i really doubt it.Andrew the Wolverine wrote:I believe it is. The only question left is: is anybody else going to be accepted before April 1? I have a feeling the answer is no.chicoalto0649 wrote:Also, anyone wanna wager on whether or not this will be the last round of rejections?
I'm with ya Andrew...No more rejects!
-
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
non URM but M and no email today (thank god). 3/23 was my 3rd update.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Lol thanks. I meant I think it'll be the last round of rejects before April 1st (their stated deadline). Obviously some of the people on the WL will be rejected, but that won't be for a while. I'm trying to keep my hopes up. Positive thinking baby.wizoz wrote:Andrew will fret like mad otherwise...please let him be optimistic !itsmytime10 wrote:How can this be the last round of rejections. i really doubt it.Andrew the Wolverine wrote:I believe it is. The only question left is: is anybody else going to be accepted before April 1? I have a feeling the answer is no.chicoalto0649 wrote:Also, anyone wanna wager on whether or not this will be the last round of rejections?
I'm with ya Andrew...No more rejects!
- Llewellyn
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:07 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
So is that a selftar?ticklememauve wrote:Nope, I'm not a URM.wizoz wrote:Next question: Are all the 3/23 completes that didn't receive a ding email also URMs?
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
if it is... forget law school... go become a model!Llewellyn wrote:So is that a selftar?ticklememauve wrote:Nope, I'm not a URM.wizoz wrote:Next question: Are all the 3/23 completes that didn't receive a ding email also URMs?
- ticklememauve
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:12 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
No, I wish.Llewellyn wrote:So is that a selftar?ticklememauve wrote:Nope, I'm not a URM.wizoz wrote:Next question: Are all the 3/23 completes that didn't receive a ding email also URMs?
It's a most-clever-witch-of-her-age-tar . . . http://christinasoldan.files.wordpress. ... ranger.jpg
Let me preempt the laughter: haha hehe haha.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:49 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
3/19 status checker update. no email yet.
166, 3.78...so i'm not exactly a splitter. hmm
166, 3.78...so i'm not exactly a splitter. hmm
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
you're considered a reverse splitter to WUSTL, with your GPA being over 3.7. if your GPA was below a 3.6 you probably would have been rejected today, considering they rejected a few 166s.lshopeful3232 wrote:3/19 status checker update. no email yet.
166, 3.78...so i'm not exactly a splitter. hmm
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:57 pm
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:24 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
Same here. I just wish WUSTL would either shit or get off the pott.MissLucky wrote:non URM but M and no email today (thank god). 3/23 was my 3rd update.
Last edited by J-tow10 on Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
once again with a 3.6GPA you are still a splitter at median GPA. if you were lower than 3.6, even a 3.59 i would have agreed.emorystud2010 wrote:im 162, 3.6, non-urm who went to a 3rd update on 3/23 who hasn't heard back. If softs matter at all in law school admissions, this is the one that would prove it.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
I don't know that there is any reason to believe there will be no more acceptances. I know people are trying to lower their expectations as a safeguard, but even WUSTL has no idea whether there will need to be more acceptances or not. They still don't know exactly how many people will be sending in their $200 seat deposit, and they don't know how many of the people that do will be asking for their refundable deposit back.
Anyhow, people above median have fared pretty well off the waitlist. LSN shows that of the people that were WLed above median, few got WL-Rejected. The ones that didn't get admitted after being waitlisted eventually withdrew to go somewhere else instead of being rejected. If WUSTL is really your first choice, getting a WL and being above median might not be all that bad. Of course, this cycle is different from previous years. Applications are up slightly, and the prevalence of people with LSATs of 167+ has increased due to more people retaking the test. So who knows.
Anyhow, people above median have fared pretty well off the waitlist. LSN shows that of the people that were WLed above median, few got WL-Rejected. The ones that didn't get admitted after being waitlisted eventually withdrew to go somewhere else instead of being rejected. If WUSTL is really your first choice, getting a WL and being above median might not be all that bad. Of course, this cycle is different from previous years. Applications are up slightly, and the prevalence of people with LSATs of 167+ has increased due to more people retaking the test. So who knows.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
conclusion: no one knows.JCougar wrote:I don't know that there is any reason to believe there will be no more acceptances. I know people are trying to lower their expectations as a safeguard, but even WUSTL has no idea whether there will need to be more acceptances or not. They still don't know exactly how many people will be sending in their $200 seat deposit, and they don't know how many of the people that do will be asking for their refundable deposit back.
Anyhow, people above median have fared pretty well off the waitlist. LSN shows that of the people that were WLed above median, few got WL-Rejected. The ones that didn't get admitted after being waitlisted eventually withdrew to go somewhere else instead of being rejected. If WUSTL is really your first choice, getting a WL and being above median might not be all that bad. Of course, this cycle is different from previous years. Applications are up slightly, and the prevalence of people with LSATs of 167+ has increased due to more people retaking the test. So who knows.
i agree
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:49 pm
Re: For WUSTL Applicants
my lsat is only 1 pt below last year's median and well above the 25%....is that still considered reverse splitter? the people who got rejected with 166 had much lower gpas i thought.finalaspects wrote:you're considered a reverse splitter to WUSTL, with your GPA being over 3.7. if your GPA was below a 3.6 you probably would have been rejected today, considering they rejected a few 166s.lshopeful3232 wrote:3/19 status checker update. no email yet.
166, 3.78...so i'm not exactly a splitter. hmm
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login